Oh how sweet it is. The sweet, sweet taste of revenge is so, so good. The ticking time bomb created by the confluence of the politicians, Supreme Court, media monopoly and banking cartels is ready to blow. Hillary and the Donald have beat them at their own game and the juggernaut is dismantling.
The howling and guttural
growling coming from the beast as it is being exorcised from the body politic
is reaching ear shattering decibels. The
carefully cultivated electoral process where the candidates are selected before
the first ballot is cast is over. The
New World Order is over, done, kaput.
Once installed in
office, Obama and his self-proclaimed Zionist Veep Biden put the Project for a
New American Century’s New World Order on steroids. For the next eight years the governments in
Ukraine, Greece, Burkina Faso, Egypt and on and on were overthrown, bankrupted
and natural resources sold off.
Now the neocons are
panic stricken begging the voters to flock to Marco Rubio, begging Democrats to
skip the Democratic primary and vote for Marco Rubio in the Republican
primary. The stench of desperation is emanating
from every source imaginable. From Peter
Beinart at The Atlantic:
Excerpt:
Why Liberals Should Vote
for Marco Rubio
Democrats must do everything they can to prevent
Donald Trump’s nomination—like supporting the one man with a chance to beat
him..
Ha, ha. Fat chance Peter, you have no idea how many
Democrats support Trump, but go on, make your case. This should be good:
Marco Rubio would be a terrible president. His
tax proposals make George W. Bush look fiscally prudent. He acts as if America
can use sanctions, war, or the threat of war to bludgeon its adversaries into
submission despite the devastating failure of that approach since 9/11. He has
been dishonest and gutless on immigration. He has flirted with climate-change
denial even though his hometown now regularly floods.
Still, if I lived in any of the nine Super
Tuesday states that allow non-Republicans to vote in their GOP presidential
primary, I would cross over—forfeiting my chance to cast a ballot for Hillary
Clinton or Bernie Sanders—and vote for Rubio….
Just imagine what might happen if were Trump
nominated or, God forbid, elected. In myriad ways, America would become an
uglier, scarier place.
If Rubio won, by contrast, the Republican Party
might be stabilized. The terms of debate between the two parties would remain
roughly the same. Given how radical even “establishment” Republicans like Rubio
actually are, that’s a depressing prospect.
Nominating Trump would upend all that. American
politics would fundamentally change. But as conservatives have often reminded
liberals, change does not equal progress. Sometimes
even a morally corrupt status quo is better than what follows. A Trump
nomination would represent a leap into a terrifying political unknown.
Gee, that’s so
persuasive all that sweet talk about Marco Rubio. What a dumb ass. So whom else wants to sweet talk to voters to
back Rubio even if he is a tool for Vulture Capitalist Paul Singer? Why it’s none other than Vulture Capitalist
Larry Summers. From The Chicago Tribune:
Excerpt:
Commentary: Donald Trump
is a threat to American democracy
The possible election of Donald Trump as president is the greatest present threat to the
prosperity and security of the United States. I have had a strong point of
view on each of the last 10 presidential elections, but never before have I
feared that what I regarded as the wrong outcome would in the long sweep of
history risk grave damage to the
American project.
Now that’s rich, the architect
of the greatest global economic disaster in the history of the world is afraid
that President Trump is a threat to the prosperity and security that he and his
Zionist buddy Joe Biden helped create.
Larry you’re an even bigger dumb ass than Peter Beinart.
So let’s take a little
jaunt over to the Libertarian side and see it they can convince us to dump
Trump for the bankers’ choice Marco Rubio.
So what’s Ilia Somin at the Volokh Conspiracy have to say?
Excerpt:
Time to unite against
Trump
Donald Trump’s victories in New Hampshire, South
Carolina, and now Nevada should be a wakeup call to all who oppose him. The
time has come for us to unite – and to prioritize Trump’s defeat over other
electoral considerations.
If you are a conservative or libertarian who
cares about upholding the Constitution and limiting the power of government,
your main goal in this GOP nomination campaign must be to stop Trump.
I am not going to go over all the reasons why
Trump would be a horrible nominee in detail. That has been done already by
others, such as Peter Wehner, and the
participants in the National Review symposium on Trump…
At least in the short term, we cannot eliminate the ignorance and xenophobic bigotry that drives
much of Trump’s support. But we can work to ensure that all those who
oppose Trump within the GOP unite under the same flag…
Who should be the one? It’s pretty obvious that
Ben Carson’s campaign is hopeless, at this point. John Kasich is an admirable
candidate in a number of ways. But it’s also clear that he has very little if
any chance of winning….
Ted Cruz has better odds than Kasich, and even
managed to beat Trump in Iowa. I am far from being a big Cruz fan myself.
Still, I can understand why many conservatives – and even a few of my
libertarian friends – support him. But, whether you like him or not, he has only
a small chance of success….
That leaves Marco Rubio as the best choice.
Rubio is acceptable to a wide range of conservative and moderate Republicans,
and to both the Tea Party wing and the establishment…
There is a plausible argument that Cruz would
have a better chance in a one on one race with Trump than Rubio would.
Oh Ilya, you know I love
you but no matter how many times you and your pals at VC close your eyes and
click your heels together repeating “Cruz is natural born American” he is
not. An American woman’s uterus is not
an American territory.
The logic that anyone born
anywhere in the world, as long as your mother was an American you automatically
are a natural born citizen of the USA is bogus.
David Drucker from the Washington
Examiner was on C-Span this morning making the same bullshit case that Ted Cruz
is a natural born citizen. Some on the
right are comparing Donald Trump to Hitler, but truth be told it is Ted Cruz is
more comparable to Hitler. From Joseph Farah at WND:
Excerpt:
HITLER WAS INELIGIBLE FOR PRESIDENCY, TOO
Exclusive: Joseph Farah shows how Germans of
1932 also dumbed down their constitution
The American political and media elite have
determined, for whatever reason, that the Constitution’s eligibility
requirements for the presidency are not important….
It’s not unprecedented that failing republics
dumb down eligibility requirements for the presidency. It’s not unprecedented
that failing republics ignore or obscure eligibility requirements for the
presidency. It’s not unprecedented that failing republics make tragic mistakes
in permitting non-qualified candidates to serve in the presidency.
It happened in 1932 in Germany with a candidate
named Adolf Hitler.
In fact, this tragedy, which resulted in the
deaths of tens of millions of innocents and the utter destruction of the German
republic, is documented in the biography of Dietrich Bonhoeffer by Eric
Metaxas.
Of course when Mr. Farah
wrote that piece in 2011 he was referring to Barack Obama’s eligibility to be
President. Funny that many on the right
that felt that way about the constitutional requirement of being a “natural
born citizen” now have amnesia.
The neoliberals and
neoconservatives fear Trump the most, especially Rupert Murdoch and his media
empire. From Newsmax:
Excerpt:
Trump: I'll 'Open Up'
Libel Laws if Elected
Republican U.S. presidential front-runner Donald Trump said on
Friday that if elected he would "open up" libel laws to make suing
the media easier.
Speaking at a rally in Fort Worth, Texas, Trump said the change
was necessary to combat what he described as the "dishonesty" of
major American newspapers.
Trump routinely criticizes the press during campaign appearances,
complaining about coverage he says is unfair and at times singling out people
or news outlets for special insults. He often invites audiences at his rallies
to boo the journalists gathered in a special fenced-off part of the room. At a
Dec. 23 appearance in Grand Rapids, Michigan, he joked about killing journalists
as the crowd thundered applause.
"One of the things I'm going to do if I win," he said on
Friday, "I'm going to open up our libel law so when they write purposely
negative and horrible and false articles, we can sue them and win lots of
money."
If you really think
about it, what Trump is saying is that he will get rid of Citizens United, the
worst Supreme Court decision in our nation’s history. From Reclaim Democracy:
Excerpt:
What is Citizens United? | An Introduction
…Citizens United, the PAC, was founded in 1988 by Floyd Brown, a
longtime Washington political consultant, with major funding from the Koch
brothers (industrialists who own “the second largest privately owned company in
the United States”).
It gained fame in 2009 for suing the Federal Election Commission,
leading to a controversial Supreme Court case (now also commonly known as
Citizens United) eliminating some restrictions on how corporations can spend
money in elections…
In the 2008 election season, Citizens United the PAC sought to
broadcast TV ads for a video-on-demand film criticizing presidential candidate
Hilary Rodham Clinton, but doing so would violate the 2002 Bipartisan Campaign
Reform Act (known also as the McCain–Feingold Act), which barred corporations and unions from paying for media that
mentioned any candidate in periods immediately preceding elections…
In a 5-4 ruling, the
Justices declared unconstitutional the government restriction on “independent”
political spending by corporations and unions, and determined the
anti-Clinton broadcast should have been allowed. The decision overturned century-old precedent allowing the
government to regulate such spending….
One of the main
instruments of this influence is the legal concept of “corporate personhood,” wherein corporations receive the same
Constitutional protections as individuals. Corporations use these protections to claim
the “right” to lie to the public, for example, or to influence
elections in various ways.
Corporations have
lobbied for and received these protections for decades, despite our country’s
founders intending no such thing. The Citizens United decision is just the latest in a long line of
decisions granting Constitutional rights to corporations.
Yes, Citizens United was
launched to allow personal attacks and lies against Hillary Clinton during a
campaign. Joe Biden and his Republican
wing of the Democratic Party had big plans for this campaign season.
The plan was to
continually leak lies to a compliant press about Hillary to weaken her and then
have Biden and the super delegates step in and declare her unelectable.
Everything was moving right along according to plan until Donald J. Trump
announced his candidacy and wham.
There’s a real dilemma here,
if they knock Hillary out of the competition that leaves Trump. If they knock
Trump out that leaves Hillary. What to
do, oh what to do.
The Oh how sweet it
is. The sweet, sweet taste of revenge is
so, so good. The ticking time bomb created
by the confluence of the politicians, Supreme Court, media monopoly and banking
cartels is ready to blow. Hillary and
the Donald have beat them at their own game and the juggernaut is dismantling.
Sweet revenge, sweet
revenge will prevail without fail.
By Patricia Baeten
No comments:
Post a Comment