Wizard of Oz meets the Exorcist - look who is in charge of the American government it’s Satan

 

“The welfare of humanity is always the alibi of tyrants.”– Albert Camus

“Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.” – Voltaire

 The American government has become the Great Satan, spreading death, destruction and chaos at home and across the globe.  Since the government was overthrown by a bipartisan Zionist cabal in 2000 the American people have been existing in an open air prison.  The politicians are no longer elected by the people to serve the interests of the people, they are installed by the globalist bankers who own them. 

Many have dual citizenship and their slavish devotion to the government of Israel overrides any loyalty to America and therefore American lives and treasure serve Israel’s apartheid state.  The American people are treated as badly as the Palestinian people with American police being trained in Israel and equipped with weapons of war. It was in this atmosphere that Donald Trump emerged as the anti-establishment candidate and won the presidency in 2016.

The W. Bush/Obama cabal that has infested our government since 2000 unleashed the CIA/FBI/MI6/Mossad forces to destroy Trump’s presidency to no avail, therefore they had to ensure he was removed in an overtly rigged election.  Donald Trump, like Toto in the Wizard of Oz pulled back the curtain and revealed the true nature of our government.  Unlike the fumbling Wizard pulling levers, spewing fire and yelling don’t look at that man behind the curtain, those who looked saw something far more horrifying.

We saw the beast laid bare the same beast that was behind the atrocities of the Crusades, Hitler’s Nazi Germany, Idi Amin’s Uganda, the Rwanda massacre, Pol Pot’s Cambodia, W. Bush’s Afghanistan and Iraq, Obama’s Libya and Syria and Biden’s Ukraine. President Trump tried to end these endless occupations that have killed and maimed millions but the evil forces remain in power no matter who occupies the White House and continues their genocide in the shadows. 

We are constantly told that Israel is the only Democracy in the Middle East but since Benjamin Netanyahu was installed in office with the plan written up by the Project for a New American Century, Israel’s form of government is anything but Democratic.  Netanyahu’s Israel has no interest in peace.  From Juan Cole at Activist Post:

Excerpt:

Israel—the “Only Middle East Democracy”—Criminalizes Journalism, Arrests Al Jazeera Reporter for Covering East Jerusalem

The Israeli police took another step toward criminalizing journalism on Saturday when they arrested Al Jazeera Arabic correspondent Givara al-Budeiri while she was covering a demonstration in the Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood of East Jerusalem marking the anniversary of the Naksa, the Setback.

That term is how is how Palestinians refer to the 1967 Israeli military occupation of the Palestinian territories. She was clearly wearing a vest marked “Press” when Israeli police assaulted her, shoved her against a wall, kicked her, packed her into a squad car and kicked her some more, then jailed her for seven hours. She complained of pain in her right side.  The Israelis released her on condition that she stay away from the Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood for 15 days.

What? Why?

The Israeli authorities initially tried to accuse her of assaulting the police, but the Israeli police beating of the hapless journalist were caught on camera by the Al Jazeera cameraman, and they had to back away from that tactic. Then they said she hadn’t clearly identified herself as a journalist, but her vest is clearly visible.

The Israeli authorities are clearly trying to keep the international press away from Sheikh Jarrah. On June 10, Israeli squatter-settlers who are measuring Palestinians’ apartments for new drapes in hopes of displacing them and taking their apartments, will march provocatively through Sheikh Jarrah with Israeli flags, on “Flag Day…”

Sometime soon, as well, the Israeli courts will rule on the planned displacement of over dozens of Palestinian families from their homes in Sheikh Jarrah and Silwan.  Ms. al-Budeiri’s brutal treatment may have been intended to send a message to Al Jazeera journalists to stay away.

Note that these events happened in what Israel considers Israeli territory, not in the Occupied West Bank. Israel illegally annexed East Jerusalem to its district of Jerusalem, an act prohibited by the United Nations charter.

On Friday, Palestinian residents of Israel organized a charity run from Sheikh Jarrah to Silwan in East Jerusalem, in part to protest the upcoming displacement of families from their apartments in those two places by Israeli squatters. The Israeli security forces attacked the runners, injuring 23 of them…

So here again you have, on what the government says is Israeli soil, police beating up on people and violating the right to freely assemble, criminalizing peaceful protest.

Israel under outgoing right wing prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu has long since moved away from democratic norms…

The American government was overthrown just as Netanyahu came to power and George W. Bush was installed as president with a preordained agenda for world domination.  Bush was wildly unpopular with an approval rate of less than thirty percent, that is until the 911 false flag attack on American soil.  Within nine months what was sold as a Pearl Harbor type was launched to justify unending wars and financial destruction of America.  From a 2002 article by John Pilger in If Americans Knew:

Excerpt:

“A New Pearl Harbor”

Two years ago a project set up by the men who now surround George W Bush said what America needed was “a new Pearl Harbor.” Its published aims have, alarmingly, come true.  The threat posed by US terrorism to the security of nations and individuals was outlined in prophetic detail in a document written more than two years ago and disclosed only recently.

What was needed for America to dominate much of humanity and the world’s resources, it said, was “some catastrophic and catalysing event – like a new Pearl Harbor”. The attacks of 11 September 2001 provided the “new Pearl Harbor”, described as “the opportunity of ages”. The extremists who have since exploited 11 September come from the era of Ronald Reagan, when far-right groups and “think-tanks” were established to avenge the American “defeat” in Vietnam.

In the 1990s, there was an added agenda: to justify the denial of a “peace dividend” following the cold war. The Project for the New American Century was formed, along with the American Enterprise Institute, the Hudson Institute and others that have since merged the ambitions of the Reagan administration with those of the current Bush regime.

One of George W Bush’s “thinkers” is Richard Perle. I interviewed Perle when he was advising Reagan; and when he spoke about “total war”, I mistakenly dismissed him as mad. He recently used the term again in describing America’s “war on terror”. “No stages,” he said. “This is total war. We are fighting a variety of enemies.

There are lots of them out there. All this talk about first we are going to do Afghanistan, then we will do Iraq... this is entirely the wrong way to go about it. If we just let our vision of the world go forth, and we embrace it entirely and we don’t try to piece together clever diplomacy, but just wage a total war... our children will sing great songs about us years from now.”

Perle is one of the founders of the Project for the New American Century, the PNAC. Other founders include Dick Cheney, now vice-president, Donald Rumsfeld, defence secretary, Paul Wolfowitz, deputy defence secretary, I Lewis Libby, Cheney’s chief of staff, William J Bennett, Reagan’s education secretary, and Zalmay Khalilzad, Bush’s ambassador to Afghanistan.

These are the modern chartists of American terrorism. The PNAC’s seminal report, Rebuilding America’s Defences: strategy, forces and resources for a new century, was a blueprint of American aims in all but name. Two years ago it recommended an increase in arms-spending by $48bn so that Washington could “fight and win multiple, simultaneous major theatre wars”. This has happened. It said the United States should develop “bunker-buster” nuclear weapons and make “star wars” a national priority. This is happening. It said that, in the event of Bush taking power, Iraq should be a target. And so it is.

As for Iraq’s alleged “weapons of mass destruction”, these were dismissed, in so many words, as a convenient excuse, which it is. “While the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate justification,” it says, “the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein.”

How has this grand strategy been implemented? A series of articles in the Washington Post, co-authored by Bob Woodward of Watergate fame and based on long interviews with senior members of the Bush administration, reveals how 11 September was manipulated.

On the morning of 12 September 2001, without any evidence of who the hijackers were, Rumsfeld demanded that the US attack Iraq. According to Woodward, Rumsfeld told a cabinet meeting that Iraq should be “a principal target of the first round in the war against terrorism”.

Iraq was temporarily spared only because Colin Powell, the secretary of state, persuaded Bush that “public opinion has to be prepared before a move against Iraq is possible”. Afghanistan was chosen as the softer option. If Jonathan Steele’s estimate in the Guardian is correct, some 20,000 people in Afghanistan paid the price of this debate with their lives.

Time and again, 11 September is described as an “opportunity”. In last April’s New Yorker, the investigative reporter Nicholas Lemann wrote that Bush’s most senior adviser, Condoleezza Rice, told him she had called together senior members of the National Security Council and asked them “to think about ‘how do you capitalise on these opportunities’”, which she compared with those of “1945 to 1947”: the start of the cold war.

Since 11 September, America has established bases at the gateways to all the major sources of fossil fuels, especially central Asia. The Unocal oil company is to build a pipeline across Afghanistan. Bush has scrapped the Kyoto Protocol on greenhouse gas emissions, the war crimes provisions of the International Criminal Court and the anti-ballistic missile treaty.

He has said he will use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear states “if necessary”. Under cover of propaganda about Iraq’s alleged weapons of mass destruction, the Bush regime is developing new weapons of mass destruction that undermine international treaties on biological and chemical warfare.

In the Los Angeles Times, the military analyst William Arkin describes a secret army set up by Donald Rumsfeld, similar to those run by Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger and which Congress outlawed. This “super-intelligence support activity” will bring together the “CIA and military covert action, information warfare, and deception”.

According to a classified document prepared for Rumsfeld, the new organisation, known by its Orwellian moniker as the Proactive Pre-emptive Operations Group, or P2OG, will provoke terrorist attacks which would then require “counter-attack” by the United States on countries “harbouring the terrorists”.

In other words, innocent people will be killed by the United States. This is reminiscent of Operation Northwoods, the plan put to President Kennedy by his military chiefs for a phoney terrorist campaign - complete with bombings, hijackings, plane crashes and dead Americans - as justification for an invasion of Cuba. Kennedy rejected it.

He was assassinated a few months later. Now Rumsfeld has resurrected Northwoods, but with resources undreamt of in 1963 and with no global rival to invite caution. You have to keep reminding yourself this is not fantasy: that truly dangerous men, such as Perle and Rumsfeld and Cheney, have power. The thread running through their ruminations is the importance of the media: “THE PRIORITISED TASK OF BRINGING ON BOARD JOURNALISTS OF REPUTE TO ACCEPT OUR POSITION”.

“Our position” is code for lying. Certainly, as a journalist, I have never known official lying to be more pervasive than today. We may laugh at the vacuities in Tony Blair’s “Iraq dossier” and Jack Straw’s inept lie that Iraq has developed a nuclear bomb (which his minions rushed to “explain”). But the more insidious lies, justifying an unprovoked attack on Iraq and linking it to would-be terrorists who are said to lurk in every Tube station, are routinely channelled as news. They are not news; they are black propaganda.

This corruption makes journalists and broadcasters mere ventriloquists’ dummies. An attack on a nation of 22 million suffering people is discussed by liberal commentators as if it were a subject at an academic seminar, at which pieces can be pushed around a map, as the old imperialists used to do.

The issue for these humanitarians is not primarily the brutality of modern imperial domination, but how “bad” Saddam Hussein is. There is no admission that their decision to join the war party further seals the fate of perhaps thousands of innocent Iraqis condemned to wait on America’s international death row.

Their doublethink will not work. You cannot support murderous piracy in the name of humanitarianism. Moreover, the extremes of American fundamentalism that we now face have been staring at us for too long for those of good heart and sense not to recognise them.

If only John Pilger were right when he said “the extremes of American fundamentalism that we now face have been staring at us for too long for those of good heart and sense not to recognise them.” 

 But alas America’s media has been completely coopted by the intelligence agencies and the American people have been subjected to continuous terrorist attacks to keep them in a state subjugation.  All it takes to get the American people on board with this imperialist agenda is to tell them we are saving oppressed people from a vicious, murderous dictator.  From Consortium News:

Excerpt:

George W. Bush’s Shameful Legacy in Afghanistan

Former President George W. Bush is bewailing President Joe Biden’s plan to withdraw all U.S. troops from Afghanistan.  Bush told Fox News last week, “I’m also deeply concerned about the sacrifices of our soldiers, and our intelligence community, will be forgotten,” after the war ends. Unfortunately, the vast majority of the American media has already forgotten how Bush’s lies turned U.S. intervention in Afghanistan into a quagmire that pointlessly killed and maimed thousands of American soldiers.

After Al Qaeda hijacked four airplanes on Sept. 11, wreaking death and destruction in New York and Washington, it was inevitable that the U.S. military would respond. But rather than targeting Al Qaeda and Osama Bin Laden, Bush chose to conquer Afghanistan and seek to rebuild it as some type of female-friendly utopia. While the Bush White House boasted of liberating the downtrodden Afghan people, Bush’s military geniuses let Bin Laden and other Al Qaeda leaders escape at Tora Bora.

Brazen lies permeated Bush’s efforts from the start. In his State of the Union address on Jan. 29, 2002, Bush frightened Americans with a bogus nuclear threat: “Our discoveries in Afghanistan confirmed our worst fears. . . . We have found diagrams of American nuclear power plants and public water facilities” in caves used by Al Qaeda.

Senior CIA and FBI officials followed up with “background” briefings to the media, revving up the threat that Afghan-based Al Qaeda fighters were targeting U.S. nuclear power facilities. This made the terrorist threat far more ominous and spurred support for Bush’s preemptive war policy against Iraq.

Two years later, Bush administration officials admitted that the president’s statement was completely false and that no nuclear power plant diagrams had been discovered in Afghanistan…

Bush’s lies on a nuclear threat from Afghanistan paved the way to his far more destructive lies regarding Iraqi chemical and biological weapons in his 2003 State of the Union address…

Sanctifying War as Women’s Victory

Bush sanctified his Afghan war as the greatest triumph for women’s liberation in modern history. In his 2002 State of the Union address, Bush boasted, “The mothers and daughters of Afghanistan were captives in their own homes.… Today women are free.” But a United Nations report the following year on rural Afghanistan concluded that “the situation of women has not changed to any great extent since the removal of the Taliban.”

New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof, who visited Afghanistan in early 2004, reported that “many Afghan women are still captives in their homes…. The rise of banditry and rape has had a particularly devastating effect on women.

Because the roads are not safe even in daylight, girls do not dare go to schools or their mothers to health centers.” One international aid worker commented that during the Taliban era “if a woman went to market and showed an inch of flesh she would have been flogged — now she’s raped.”

In 2009, shortly after Bush’s presidency ended, THE U.S.-APPOINTED PRESIDENT OF AFGHANISTAN, HAMID KARZAI, APPROVED A LAW ENTITLING HUSBANDS TO STARVE THEIR WIVES TO DEATH IF THEY DENIED THEM SEX.

But at least the U.S. government was not systematically subsidizing the rape of women — unlike the brutal fate of Afghan boys. Since the start of Bush’s invasion of Afghanistan, the U.S. military has poured money into Afghan government operations guilty of Bacha bazi — turning young boys into sex slaves.

Boys in Sex Slavery

The Pentagon ignored the abuse until a 2015 New York Times exposé of American soldiers who were punished for protesting atrocities against young boys. The Times reported that U.S. troops were confounded that “instead of weeding out pedophiles, the American military was arming them in some cases and placing them as the commanders of villages — and doing little when they began abusing children.”

In 2017, the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) reported, “Afghan officials remain complicit, especially in the sexual exploitation … of children by Afghan security forces…”

During his 2004 reelection campaign, Bush boasted, “Thanks to the United States… Afghanistan is no longer a haven for terror. Afghanistan is a free country.” But the Bush administration did nothing to prevent the Afghan government it installed from tyrannizing the Afghan people. Even more damning, the U.S. military and CIA brazenly tortured Afghans, atrocities that President Bush perpetually denied even though it was reported as early as December 2002.

Torture Regime

In 2004, the Los Angeles Times reported allegations that Afghan soldiers detained by the U.S. government had suffered “repeated beatings, immersion in cold water, electric shocks, being hung upside down and toenails being torn off…”

Bush has never taken responsibility or shown any remorse for setting up an illegal worldwide torture regime. During his years in the White House, Bush perennially denied that he had approved torture. But in 2010, during an author tour to promote his new memoir, he bragged about approving waterboarding for terrorist suspects.

Dishonest from Start

Bush’s Afghan war was not good intentions gone awry: It was profoundly dishonest from the start. Afghanistan quickly became nothing more than a political boasting point for Bush.  In October 2002, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld was appalled when Bush did not even recognize the name of the U.S. general in charge of Afghanistan and had no interest in meeting him.

Christopher Kolenda, a U.S. Army colonel who repeatedly deployed to Afghanistan to advise top U.S. commanders, declared that the Afghan government had “self-organized into a kleptocracy,” a government of thieves, by 2006.  Ryan Crocker, Bush’s ambassador to Afghanistan, admitted, “Our biggest single project, sadly and inadvertently, of course, may have been the development of mass corruption.”

An investigation by SIGAR found that it was “common at military headquarters in Kabul — and at the White House — to distort statistics to make it appear the United States was winning the war when that was not the case.”  In 2019, SIGAR chief John Sopko summarized the U.S. intervention in Afghanistan: “The American people have constantly been lied to.”

Forgotten falsehoods almost guarantee new political treachery. George W. Bush now serves as a “useful idiot” for politicians who want to perpetuate America’s disastrous interventions abroad. But if there is any justice, the name of George W. Bush will live in infamy as a betrayer of American soldiers and the Afghan people as well as an enemy of decency and the U.S. Constitution.

Evil took over America in 2000 when the U.S. Supreme Court stopped the votes from being counted and declared George W. Bush President of the United States.  Bush packed the courts with extremists who do not believe in the constitution nor do they believe in the rule of law.  Those judges were confirmed by a Zionist majority in the Senate. 

 The 2021 election was a sham and now the Zionists have retaken control of the American government and are turning their attention to destroying the constitutional rights of the American people.  The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq with their torture regime laid the groundwork for the destruction of the court system in America.  From The Activist Post:

Excerpt:

Torture Enters the Courtroom

For the first time in American history, a federal judge last week authorized the government to admit as evidence in a criminal case in a public courtroom words uttered by the defendant that were obtained under torture.

The fruits of torture – which is any cruel or degrading or intentionally painful or disorienting behavior visited upon a person in captivity to induce compliance or to gratify the torturer – are not permitted in any court in the United States, and their inducement is criminal.

Here is the backstory.

Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, a low-level former member of the Taliban, is accused with others of plotting the suicide bombing of the USS Cole in October 2000 that killed 17 American sailors. He has been in U.S. custody since 2002 and at the US Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, since 2004. When he was first captured, he was turned over to the CIA for interrogation, not the Department of Justice for prosecution.

The practice of the federal government immediately following 9/11, when it captured anyone overseas from whom it believed it could extract national security information, was to hand the person over to the CIA for torture – the feds call it “enhanced interrogation” – at a “dark site” in a foreign country with which the US does not have an extradition treaty.

The reason for the location of the torture was the erroneous belief by DOJ and CIA officials that torture conducted or condoned by American personnel is not prosecutable if it occurs outside the U.S.  That has never been the law in the U.S., but it has been the practice of the DOJ and the CIA to shield their personnel with secrecy when they are caught engaging in torture in a foreign country.

However, because either the tortured person or someone connected to whatever the tortured person revealed was to be tried in a federal court, and because no federal court can admit evidence against a defendant that was obtained under torture, the feds devised a scheme around this. 

That scheme called for FBI “clean teams” to interrogate the tortured person after the torture was completed, using conventional and lawful interrogation techniques. These techniques often proved more successful than CIA torture. Because these techniques were lawful, and the person being interrogated was advised of his rights and treated humanely by the FBI, the information thus obtained from him was usable in federal court.

At trial, a defendant can always demonstrate that he had been tortured, not to obtain the jury’s sympathy but to enable his lawyers to argue to the jurors that they should disregard as unconstitutional, immoral, unlawful and un-American whatever evidence the torture produced.

Al-Nashiri’s lawyers told the court and the prosecutors at Guantanamo Bay that they intend to argue at trial to the jury that the government has the wrong man and that the true plotters have already been killed by US forces. The feds, in order to counter that argument, told the court that they have statements that al-Nashiri made during his torture that can arguably be used to question his defense...

If the trial judge had followed the law, he would have ordered the torturers into his court room and had them arrested on the spot.  But the trial judge in this case did not follow American law and rejected American values and all sense of human decency when he authorized the government to introduce at trial a partial transcript of the statements al-Nashiri allegedly made under torture.

He also broke with 230 years of precedent. He also gave judicial credibility to governmental barbarism and nihilism in the extreme, which holds that individual human beings are subject to the state and, since their rights come from the state, they and their rights exist at the pleasure of the state.

The government lies, cheats, steals and kills; and it has written laws that permit it to do so and make legal recourse against it nearly impossible.  But nothing it does is more damnable than torture.  Torture is the ultimate triumph of the state over a person and the ultimate degradation of personhood. It is a complete rejection of the values of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. And it doesn’t work…

Many appeals remain for al-Nashiri before his jury trial comes to pass; and torture – with all its sufferings by victim and perpetrators – is part of the history of his case. I trust that saner judicial heads in the appellate process will prevail and this precedent-shattering and monstrous decision will soon be overturned. But its damage is done.

The government of the United States engages in torture and will continue to do so until the torturers are punished. And the prosecutors for whom the torturers work will someday try again to get the fruits of their barbaric behavior legitimized in an American courtroom.

When will the government stop the use of torture? Whom will it torture next? Why does it swear to uphold the Constitution and then trash it?

The courts in America have been infested with judges who serve large corporations and have allowed predators like Chevron to torture and imprison American citizens in an extra-judicial unconstitutional system.

Now the Great Satan believes they cannot be stopped, they control all the levers of power and will not relinquish power if they have to destroy America to hold onto it.  This is the final solution as was laid out in the Project for a New American Century’s revival of Zionism and the lust for global domination.  This is the secret society that President John F. Kennedy spoke of before he was assassinated.  Will the world survive these nuclear armed lunatics?  We’ll see.  America is in need of an Exorcism.