Saturday, August 31, 2013

WTC Building #7 Demolition, Zionism and Other Taboo Subjects on C-Span’s Washington Journal

During the open phones segment on C-Span’s Washington Journal the subject was “Military Decisions:  What Does Public Need to Know”.  First of all, I find it rather specious, but not surprising that Washington Journal would try to skew public opinion in the direction that the American Public should accept, without question Military action anywhere the government decides, without the consent of the American People. 

During the open phones a “Taboo Subject” came up again, “Zionism”.  As with callers questioning the government’s official stand on the cause of Building #7 of the World Trade Center collapsing into its own footprint on 9-11, any reference to Zionism is immediately dismissed. 


Being the contrarian that I am, I felt compelled to explore why the people are so concerned about the possibility of a Zionist takeover of the media in the United States.  As I listened to the caller, I felt like an amnesiac having a memory triggered by a word, or a sight, or a smell.  I remembered something I once saw on TV, but I didn’t remember where, so with the help of Google I found it. 

So what does it mean to be a “Zionist”?  Well to understand, I decided to research the “Project for a New American Century’s Clean Break Strategy”.

In 1997, a small group of potentially powerful people, just twenty five of them, announced the formation of a new organization dedicated to building up the power of the United States to unparalleled levels. They were clearly looking forward to the presidential election of 2000 and the beginning of a new millennium, because they called their organization "The Project for the New American Century" (PNAC).

Well, just twenty-five powerful individuals, doesn’t sound very ominous to me. 

Principles were Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, as well as a number of people whom they recruited to join them in the Bush administration, including Cheney's National Security Adviser, I. Lewis Libby, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, former Middle East envoy Zalmay Khalilzad, and new special Middle East envoy Elliot Abrams.

A few right-wing Republican politicians, Jeb Bush, Dan Quayle, and Steve Forbes signed on; two influential representatives of the Christian Right, William Bennett and Gary Bauer; and some influential neo-conservative intellectuals and writers, such as Francis Fukuyama, Norman Podhoretz, Midge Decter, and Eliot Cohen.

Now that’s a little more interesting, especially in light of the disputed 2000 Election when the vote counting in Florida was shut down due to staffers and persons connected to PNAC storming the hall where the votes were being counted and rioting and threatening the lives of those counting the votes.

A further investigation of PNAC and its influence in the U. S. Government, uncovered their manifesto “Clean Break Strategy, Securing the Realm”.

In an article called “Clean Break or Dirty War?” Israel’s Foreign Policy Directive to the United States published by Institute for Research:  Middle Eastern Policy breaks down the plan that was laid out by PNAC for the “New American Century”.   

The Clean Break Strategy outlines the plans by PNAC to systematically use the United States treasury, military, government and media to advance the interests of the militant Zionist faction of Israel for the unyielding power of Israel.  It must be noted that as Joe Biden has said “Not all Jews are Zionists, Not all Zionists are Jews, I am a Zionist”, it is true.  

There is a large segment of the Jewish population as well as a large segment of the World and American population that are not Zionists, but they do not control the levers of power that have been seized by the Neocon/Zionist regime.

The Executive Summary of the Clean Break Strategy states:

Great changes are seldom achieved without a plan. The Israeli policy paper “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm” (ACB) was authored by a group of policy advisors to Israel. Subsequently, nearly all members ascended to influential policy making positions within U.S. government, media, and academic circles. Many of the ACB policies such as toppling the government of Iraq are now in full implementation and present new challenges to the global community. Others, such as the reform of Israel’s economy have been abysmal failures, but generate little visibility or impact outside of Israel. (See Exhibit 1))

Exhibit #1 “Clean Break

Exhibit #1 states that many of the authors of ACB ascended to new heights of political power in the U.S.  It also outlines that “the ACB policies, are for the most part extremely damaging to U.S. interests”.  The goal of the “clean break” is a complete failure of U.S. interests in the Middle East.

Exhibit #2 “Securing the Realm”

This section contains pages of policy recommendations for Benjamin Netanyahu.  In 1996 the Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies’ Study Group on a New Israeli Strategy toward 2000” published a plan for the new American Century starting with the 2000 U.S. Presidential election.  The group included Richard Perle and Douglas Feith. 

If you will recall, in 2000 President Bill Clinton convened the 2000 Camp David Summit.  The Summit took place between July 11 and 25, 2000 between Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak and Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat.  Barak had conceded territory to the Palestinians and a peace agreement was close to being reached.  Ariel Sharon and Richard Perle sabotaged any peace agreement with their march on the Temple Mount

The recommendations pushed by the Study Group called for a “break” from the failed policies of the past such as “land for peace” and instead called for “peace for peace”, meaning Palestinians and future enemies must be content only with avoiding their own destruction by Israel. 

Imagine that, the only hope for peace is to accept genocide, land theft, assassination and maybe you will have peace.

A Clean Break called for a five-prong approach.

1.    Increase U.S. Congressional Support
2.    "Peace for Peace" Palestinian Strategy
3.    Contain, Destabilize, and Roll Back Regional Challengers
4.    Economic Reform
5.    Rejuvenation of Zionism

1. Increase Support in the U.S. Congress

It is political suicide for a member of the U.S. Congress to strongly oppose policy positions of Zionist lobbies operating in the United States. Former president George H. W. Bush put it best when he declared that opposing the Zionist lobby in favor of a Palestinian State was the right thing to do, but came “at a hell of price. “

The lobby converted its most powerful aid opponent by rallying massive campaign contributions to defeat North Carolina senator Jesse Helms. Pro-Israel political action committees poured an awe inspiring $222,342 into the campaign of Helms' opponent, North Carolina Governor James Hunt. Hunt's campaign secretary proclaimed that "Senator Helms has the worst anti-Israel record in the United States Senate and supporters of Israel throughout the country know it."

After the scare of almost losing reelection, Helms announced that he would exempt from cuts the more than one-third of total
U.S. foreign aid going to Israel since such aid was "in the strategic interest of the U.S." He also became an ardent and comical supporter of moving the U.S. embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem and worked diligently to increase the appropriations for Israel from the Defense Department, the State Department and half a dozen other different federal agency budgets. 

Makes a person wonder, why do these Senators hold on to their seat at any cost?  Why do they sell out the American People repeatedly?  Is the money that good?

Most of the legislation is costly to the United States in constraining American civil liberties and foreign policy initiatives in the Middle East while legitimizing even the most despicable Israeli actions much of the rest of the world community and U.N. consider to be crimes.

Well back to the Clean Break Strategy.

2. Peace for Peace Approach to the Palestinian Question
Israel has adopted all of the appearances of promoting a “peace for peace” strategy with the Palestinians. Under this policy, Palestinians have no land claims on territory within the borders of Israel or territory occupied by Israel. Palestinians and future enemies under this policy must be content only with avoiding their own destruction by Israel. 

One aggressive approach promoted by Richard Perle, former chairman of the U.S. Defense Policy Board labels Jordan as Palestine, implying relocation or “ethnic cleansing” of Palestinian peoples.

Whoa, now that’s really nuts.  Ethnic Cleansing of the Palestinian People in the name of Peace???

3. Contain, Destabilize and Roll Back Regional Challengers

The U.S. invasion of Iraq is such a singular success for Israel that pro-Israel leaders and pundits in the United States have had to restrain their glee that a long and arduous effort to topple Iraq’s government and neutralize the state has finally borne fruit.

Although Iraq is only one challenger to Israel, an accelerated Israeli effort to discredit, disrupt, and undermine other Arab governments, many in the midst of democratic reform, is moving forward rapidly.


TacticThreats of Invasion.  In secretary of State Colin Powell’s speech to a conference of AIPAC members, he spoke of the “critical choice” facing Damascus. “Syria can continue to direct support for terrorist groups and the dying regime of Saddam Hussein, or it can embark on a different and more hopeful course. Either way, Syria bears the responsibility for its choices, and the consequences,” he declared to loud applause.

Result:  The redirection of U.S. forces to Syria after toppling Saddam Hussein is a high priority for Israel An increase in allegations of Syrian transshipments of war material, and use as an entry point for regional Muslims answering a call for Jihad could quickly be aggrandized into support for use of force by the massive U.S. military force already in the region.


Tactic:  Simmering Conflict Violence in and around Golan Heights has flared. Hezbollah guerrillas on the border zone, who have been fighting to force the Israelis to withdraw, have killed seven Israeli soldiers.

Result:  Israel responded with air strikes that destroyed three Lebanese power stations and injured 20 civilians. Israel has continued its campaign to label all branches of Hezbollah as terrorists.


Tactic:  Linking Free-Lancers to Iran Defense Secretary Rumsfeld accused hundreds of Iraqi Shiite militia fighters based in Iran have crossed back into Iraq, complicating the military mission for the US-led coalition seeking to oust Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein.  He has rushed to classify them as “combatants” even though the forces could be channeled onto the American side.  Undersecretary of State John Bolton, a leading hawk, was quoted last month as telling Israeli officials that Iran would be "dealt with" after the war with Iraq.

Result:  By immediately rejecting the possibility of Shiite militia as allies and moving quickly implicate the government of Iran for what are probably freelance operatives, the Bush administration advances another step down the ACB regional challenger path.  Although the UK has rejected any support for Syrian and Iranian fronts, the mass of U.S. forces could be immediately redeployed to attack Iran.

Saudi Arabia:

Tactic:  Smear and Defame  Former Defense Policy board Chairman Richard Perle spearheaded an intense smear campaign against Saudi Arabia at the Pentagon, laying the foundations for future U.S. military action.

Result:  Perle contracted Rand Corporation analyst Laurent Muraweic on July 10, 2002. Rand’s briefing declared Saudi Arabia an “enemy of the United States” and advocated that the US invade the country, seize its oil fields and confiscate its financial assets unless the Saudis “stop supporting the anti-Western terror network.”


Tactic: Condition and Cut Foreign Aid  Condition aid to Egypt on increased support for Israel.

Result: Legislation to engage in social engineering in Egypt by tying U.S. foreign aid to rewriting curriculum to proselytize a better image of Israel Media watch campaigns and scoring are also conditions of aid.

I guess, now we can see why Secretary of State, Zionist John Kerry is making unsubstantiated claims against Syria for gassing their own people on their own land.  How stupid would that be?  So in retaliation for Assad allegedly using poison gas on his people, we will bomb his people to teach him a lesson.  How did that work out for the Iraqi people when you punished Saddam Hussein for allegedly gassing his people?

(The child was injured by U.S. bombs and the burns on his body are believed to be caused by White Phosphorus, a chemical banned by the United Nations and the World).

4. Economic Reform

Although ACB calls for increased economic independence from the U.S. which would allow freer reign for Israeli policies the U.S. directly opposes, efforts at reform have been too little, too late. Israel has mismanaged its economy and continues to export the negative consequences to the United States.

A look at this MSNBC article from April, 2013 says it all:

Israel’s booming economy puts billions in US aid under spotlight.

The boom may give a louder voice to calls for a reduction to the $3 billion worth of financial assistance Israel receives from the U.S. each year – especially in the Washington, where budget battles continue.

U.S. campaign groups such as Stop The Blank Check and the Council for the National Interest have long campaigned for the aid program to end, but Republican Sen. Rand Paul recently joined the debate by saying the U.S. could no longer afford to keep borrowing money and then handing it out to others.

"It will be harder to be a friend of Israel if we are out of money. It will be harder to defend Israel if we destroy our country in the process," Paul told the Jerusalem Institute for Market Studies, an Israeli think tank, in January.

'A political football'

That view is echoed by some in Israel, such as Naftali Bennett, a software tycoon and leader of the right-wing Jewish Home political party, who during the recent election campaign said the country needed to free itself from U.S. assistance.

“Our situation today is very different from what it was 20 and 30 years ago. Israel is much stronger, much wealthier, and we need to be independent,” he said.

In other words, “thanks suckers”. And then there’s this article from the Post Gazette:

Debt showdown: Another battle looms in Congress over red ink

The debt limit and the budget are critically important, and both problems must be worked out to keep the country functioning. The national debt will hit a horrifying $16.7 trillion in mid-October.

You know what that means folks, cuts to Social Security, Medicare, Unemployment Benefits, Veterans, Schools, Fire Fighters, Police, everything the U.S. Citizens need to live.  And forget about your 401K, it doesn’t exist, it’s been cleaned out by the Zionist World Bank.

Back to the Clean Break Strategy:  Last but not least:

5. Rejuvenation of Zionism
Supporting the rejuvenation of Zionism has had a polarizing effect within the United States and damaged the constitutionally protected freedoms of U.S. citizens.

A flow chart by the ACB shows the following game plan:

Defense Cabal:

Messaging:  Preemption/remaking the Middle East, Aid for Israel/Joint Weapons Development, New Homeland Security Business Opportunities and Legitimization of Israeli Occupation of Palestinian territories. 

Medium:  Think-Tanks, Defense Policy Board, Department of Defense Contractors, Talk Shows and Investment Banks. 

Members:  Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, Eliot Abrams and David Wurmser.

            Neocon Specialty Press:

Messaging:  Danger of Islam, Illegitimacy of all Arab Governments, Illegitimacy of “land for peace” initiatives, Primacy of the defense of Israel.   

Medium:  American Enterprise Institute, JINSA, Heritage Foundation, The Weekly Standard, The New Republic

Members:  David Brooks, Lawrence Kaplan, William Kristol and Norman Podhoretz, Jonah Goldberg


 Messaging:  Palestinian Militants as Terrorists, Linkage between 9/11 and all Arab governments, Israelis as “heroes”, Critics of Israel as “anti-Semites”

Medium:  Wall Street Journal, New York Times, Washington Post Editorial Pages. 

Members:  Robert Kagan, Charles Krauthammer, Max Boot and William Safire

So there you have it folks, the Neocon/Zionist plan laid out in 2003, embraced by Republicans and Democrats alike.  On Thursday, August 29th on an edition of “The Lead”, Congressman Alan Grayson spoke truth to power.

So "WAKE UP AMERICA"  you've been duped.  The biggest purveyor of death using chemical weapons is the United States of America.  Stop the madness!!.  Just say "No More War"!

by Patricia Baeten

No comments:

Post a Comment