It seems evangelical billionaire, Erik Prince rebranded his US funded Blackwater mercenary army, Academi and has sold the army to Monsanto.
Academi was created by Erik Prince in 1997, under the name Blackwater Worldwide. The company, of which some managers are linked to Evangelic churches financed by the Pentagon, played a role, in Afghanistan in Iraq, comparable to that which played the Order of Malta, during the Nicaragua War. It is presided by Billy Joe (Red), McCombs (347th US fortune), John Aschcroft (former US Attorney general) and the admiral Bobby R. Inman (former NSA director and deputy director of the CIA). Academi, which works mainly for the US government, participated in the Tripoli battle (Libya) and is currently recruiting combatants to do the Jihad in Syria.
Academi (ex-Blackwater), the world’s most powerful private army, reveals having been signed over, without indicating the name of the buyer, nor the amount for which it was bought.
Get that? Academi, the world’s most powerful private army, paid by the U.S. Pentagon, who participated in the Tripoli battle in Libya which deposed Gagdafi and has been recruiting combatants in Syria to overthrow Assad is now owned by Monsanto.
And, it seems Monsanto has a financial
interest in who will be governing Ukraine.
According to a 2013 article in Reuters:
May 24 (Reuters) - Monsanto Co, the world's
largest seed company, plans to launch a non-GM (genetically modified) corn seed
plant in Ukraine,
one of the world's leading producers of the grain, the company said on Friday.
"Monsanto is planning to build a seed
plant in Ukraine to
produce conventional corn seeds," Vitaliy Fedchuk, corporate affairs
specialist at Monsanto Ukraine, told Reuters in an email.
So, a year ago Monsanto announced
they were launching a seed plant in Ukraine, one of the largest corn producers
in the world, to produce conventional corn
seeds. Given their cash crops are
genetically modified Frankenstein seeds, why are they investing $100’s of
millions in a conventional corn seed production in Ukraine?
Ukrainian laws bar local farmers from
growing genetically modified crops. Asked whether Monsanto expected changes in
regulations, Fedchuk said:
"Indeed, in Ukraine only conventional
seeds are allowed for production and importation, thus we will be working with
conventional seeds only." (Reporting by Olzhas Auyezov; Editing by Michael
Roddy)
I bet with the new Evangelical
Prime Minister backed by Monsanto’s army those laws won’t be a problem. Imagine the damage to Russia if their close
neighbor started having GM plants blowing pollen all over contaminating Russia’s
food supply.
So anyway, Ukraine's elected governent rejected a
trade agreement with the European Union and that provoked the Ukranian people
to protest and remove an elected Prime Minister. According to the New York Times:
KIEV, Ukraine — Yuri V. Lutsenko, a onetime
field commander of Ukraine’s 2004 Orange
Revolution, looked out across the tens of thousands of people who
gathered on Sunday to protest the government’s decision to back away from a
far-reaching political and trade deal with the European Union…
At stake here is not just the fate of a
free-trade pact but whether the hardball tactics of Russia, willing to use
every bit of economic muscle — including trade threats and its stranglehold on
energy supplies — to exert blunt force in negotiations, will prevail over the
national aspirations of millions of people.
The
effort to draw in Ukraine and other ex-Soviet republics is also crucial to
Europe, which has invested heavily in it and can ill afford a humiliating
defeat at a time when its stature is already being called into doubt by the
continuing economic strains within the euro zone.
Yes, the deal the elected
government of Ukraine rejected was a humiliating defeat for the US and EU.
Who is Monsanto?
Monsanto was created in 1901 and
produced saccharine used by Coca-Cola. Sacchaine
was banned in the U.S. in 1981 due to being a carcinogen.
Banned in 1981, saccharin has long been
considered carcinogenic because it produced bladder tumours in rats. Saccharin
is now unbanned, with more than 100 countries worldwide legitimately allowing
saccharin as a food sweetening additive1,
a situation that warrants further comment.
Isn’t that odd? A known
carcinogen manufactured by Monsanto is now unbanned in more than 100 countries
worldwide.
Monsanto also supplied uranium
for the Manhattan project and agent orange, the carcinogen used to defoliate
the jungles of Vietnam.
What’s interesting, and I’m not
sure if there’s a connection between Monsanto’s take over of Ukraine, is a
lawsuit brought by injured veterans against companies that contaminated and
poisoned military personnel and their families.
From the 1950’s through the
1980’s military service personnel serving at Camp Lejeune were exposed to toxic
chemicals. From the U.S. Department ofVeterans Affairs:
Camp Lejeune: Past Water Contamination
From the 1950s through the 1980s, people
living or working at the U.S. Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, North Carolina,
were potentially exposed to drinking water contaminated with industrial
solvents, benzene, and other chemicals.
Veterans and family members who served on
active duty or resided at Camp Lejeune for 30 days or more between Jan. 1, 1957
and Dec. 31, 1987 may be eligible for medical care for 15 health conditions.
Seems our veterans and their families
are dying from rare cancers caused by chemical exposure. The lawsuit is currently winding its way through court.
Veterans injured by the drinking water at Camp Lejeune should know this information
Camp Lejeune is a U.S. Marine Corps base in
North Carolina, and has been a crucial component of USMC training activities
since 1942. The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR)
has concluded that from (at least) November 1957 to February 1987,
soldiers and their milies living on-base at Camp Lejeune were exposed to
contaminated drinking water.
Soldiers – and their families – that were stationed at Camp Lejeune are finding that they are getting sick at rates far higher than any national rates in the general population.
Soldiers – and their families – that were stationed at Camp Lejeune are finding that they are getting sick at rates far higher than any national rates in the general population.
What Happened at Camp Lejeune?
The water at Lejeune is known to have toxic concentrations in excess of 240 – 3400 times what the government considers a safe level. The following chemicals are known to have been used at Lejeune, with more and more discovered each year (the list now totals over 70 known toxins in the drinking water at Lejeune):
Tricholorethylene (TCE)
Perchloroethylene (PCE)
Benzene
Vinyl Chloride
The health impacts of this are
staggering: a statistically significant number of men stationed at
Lejeune have developed breast cancer at rates that far outpace the
national rate of breast cancer in men. Birth defects in children have
also resulted, including myoletic leukemia, non-Hodgkins lymphoma, and other
forms of cancer rare to children.
But there’s another lawsuit that
is before the U.S. Supreme Court that, if found in favor of the Corporation
against the people, will nullify the Camp Lejuene veterans’ case. In an article in USA Today by Richard Wolf
entitled “Government Straddles Both Sides in Toxic Water Cases”
WASHINGTON — President Obama signed a law in
2012 offering health benefits to thousands of former Marines and their families
who were exposed decades ago to contaminated water at Camp Lejeune in North
Carolina.
But in a related case headed to the Supreme
Court in April that could bolster or block their claims for damages, Obama's
Justice Department has argued that the clock has run out.
The little-noticed case could have profound
implications for victims of hidden contamination at Camp Lejeune and other
former industrial sites in states that set deadlines on damage claims.
Those lawsuits generally involve
"enormous financial stakes — typically in the millions of dollars,"
according to a petition filed by the electronics manufacturer at the center of
the high court case.
Yes, the lawsuits involve “enormous
financial stakes for companies like Monsanto, but the Obama Administration has
their backs.
The
fact that some plaintiffs will be unaware of their claims until after the
statute of repose expires is an inherent feature of statutes of repose," the
government argued. Exposing polluters to greater liability could discourage
voluntary disclosure and cleanup, it said, as well as pose a burden to
industry.
The appeals court wasn't convinced. It sided
with the 23 landowners seeking damages and remediation because their land had
been contaminated with toxic chemicals from 1959 to 1985, when CTS Corp. ran an
electronics manufacturing plant in Asheville. It wasn't until 2009 that landowners
learned their water could cause liver and kidney damage, heart ailments and
cancer.
Seems to me the argument that “exposing
polluters to greater liability could discourage disclosure and cleanup” is a
really lame argument good thing the court of appeals disagreed. But now, the case is scheduled before the United
States Supreme Court.
You know, it is starting to look
like Putin is looking out for the best interests of Russia and that’s what a
leader is supposed to do. So let Putin
handle his part of the world and let the people of other countries determine
their own destiny without US backed, private armies like Blackwater deciding
for them.
By Patricia Baeten
No comments:
Post a Comment