Did Joe Biden use his office to leak damaging lies about Hillary Clinton’s e-mails to derail her Presidential campaign? Did Joe Biden tell Susan Rice to go on television and lie to the American people about Benghazi? Did Joe Biden use the office of the Vice President to overthrow the government in Ukraine? Did Joe Biden use his ties with Rupert Murdoch to disseminate misinformation about Hillary Clinton to advance his own interests to become President?
Joe Biden has used his dead family members to advance his career for decades and now he is using his dead son Beau to launch his presidential bid. From Time:
Beau Biden’s Dying Wish Was for His Dad to Run for President, Report Says
Vice President Joe Biden’s late son Beau told his father to run for president before he died, according to a report.
New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd, in her weekend column entitled “Joe Biden in 2016: What Would Beau Do?,” describes, in great detail, a conversation that Beau had with his father before dying, urging his father to run for president rather than letting the office fall to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Joseph “Beau” Biden III died of brain cancer at the end of May. Dowd’s source for the anecdote is not clear from the column…
A Presidential bid he’s launching due to Hillary’s faltering campaign after numerous leaks from his office questioning her “credibility, trustworthiness and lack of truthfulness.” Did Joe Biden have a hand in retroactively classifying information in Hillary’s e-mails? Is Joe Biden behind these Hillary Clinton polls that no other candidate seems to have conducted about them? From The Atlantic:
As Joe Biden edges closer to a presidential run, there’s no shortage of theories as to what he’s up to. Former secretary of state Hillary Clinton has built a commanding lead in the national polls, giving Biden little apparent space to gain traction. Perhaps he’s counting on the early-primary state of South Carolina to provide a critical boost.
He might be banking on appearing as a stronger general-election candidate than any of his potential rivals in the primary race. Maybe after spending the past 42 years of his life running for elective office, he just can’t stop.
But there’s one intriguing theory that has so far garnered little attention: What if Biden knows something about Democratic frontrunner Hillary Clinton that the rest of us don’t?...
Clinton, meanwhile, is battling a steady drip of negative headlines and revelations stemming from her use of a private email address and server during her term as secretary of state. Investigators have found that some emails contained information that was later classified, and media reports have suggested that some of this information may have been considered classified at the time it was shared, even if it hadn’t yet been labeled that way.
The emails that Clinton gave to the State Department are now being released in tranches every 30 days….. No one knows what the emails that have not yet been released may contain.
No one, that is, outside of the administration…. And the State Department has assigned a team to sort through the emails, reviewing them for classified information…
Biden forged many relationships during his long tenure in the Senate, and State is chock full of longtime friends and former aides. The current deputy secretary of state, to choose the most prominent example, is Antony Blinken. He was hired as the staff director of the Senate’s foreign relations committee in 2002, and senior adviser to its senior Democratic member: Joe Biden.
He stuck with Biden through the 2008 campaign, first becoming his national security adviser in the White House, then moving over to become Obama’s deputy national security adviser in 2013, and finally taking up his current role at the State Department in 2015.
There’s no reason to think that Blinken, or any of Biden’s other contacts within the White House or the national-security establishment, have shared with the vice president any information to which they’re privy.
Yes, according to The Atlantic “There’s no reason to think that Blinken, or any of Biden’s other contacts within the White House or the national-security establishment, have shared with the vice president any information to which they’re privy.”
Why aren’t the American people polled to see if they are aware that Joe Biden, on camera said “not all Jews are Zionists, not all Zionists are Jews, I am a Zionist.” Why aren’t the American voters polled and asked if they want a Zionist for president?
Why aren’t the American people polled and asked whether they voted to overthrow the Government in Ukraine and instigate a civil war?
From The Power of Prophecy:
Ukraine, the country now taken over by a coup d état of Israeli and the U.S. and ruled by brutal Jewish oligarchs, is set to receive billions of dollars in arms for its military from the Obama Administration. But the Ukrainians had to prove their loyalty to the Jews and to Zionism to get these armaments.
First, Ukraine’s corrupt new governors agreed to make U.S. Vice President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter, a board member of Burisma, Ukraine’s largest gas company. Hunter Biden will also be the chief legal officer of Burisma.
“This is totally based on merit,” said Burisma’s chairman, the Jew, Al Apker.
Another American, Devon Archer, was also promoted to the board. Who is Archer? Well Devon Archer and Hunter Biden are business cronies. Together with U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry’s stepson, Chris Heinz, they own a mysterious private equity firm called “Rosemart Seneca Partners.”
Two months before February’s coup d état, U.S. Vice President Joe Biden traveled to Ukraine. He met with the chief Rabbi and other top Jews and made arrangements with Burisma, aligning that gas enterprise with the American oil and gas industries. This means that Rockefeller and Rothschild and their energy pals are “in,” and Russia and Putin are “out.”
Of course, when Biden and Kerry’s sons go into Ukraine, where they don’t even know the language, and “assume supervision” of Burisma, you know that the fix is in….
American arms are pouring in, and NATO troops are in-country. Israel is training pro-Zionist Ukrainian Jews to do the dirty work of killing and destruction and sending them into the Ukraine.
At the U.S. State Department, Vicki Nuland, the powerful Jew who heads the Ukrainian desk, is dictating to the Ukraine which of the Jewish oligarchs are favored by the Jewish American and Israeli big-wigs. And, sleazy men like Hunter Biden, Devon Archer, and their U.S. sidekick, Chris Heinz, are raking in the big bucks as directors for a crooked Ukrainian energy firm. War really is a racket.
Raking in big bucks indeed, war is very lucrative, just ask Vicki Nuland, wife of neocon Robert Kagan and the whole PNAC (Project for a New American Century) crowd. From ConsortiumNews:
A Family Business of Perpetual War
Exclusive: Victoria Nuland and Robert Kagan have a great mom-and-pop business going. From the State Department, she generates wars and – from op-ed pages – he demands Congress buy more weapons. There’s a pay-off, too, as grateful military contractors kick in money to think tanks where other Kagans work, writes Robert Parry.
Neoconservative pundit Robert Kagan and his wife, Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland, run a remarkable family business: she has sparked a hot war in Ukraine and helped launch Cold War II with Russia – and he steps in to demand that Congress jack up military spending so America can meet these new security threats.
This extraordinary husband-and-wife duo makes quite a one-two punch for the Military-Industrial Complex, an inside-outside team that creates the need for more military spending, applies political pressure to ensure higher appropriations, and watches as thankful weapons manufacturers lavish grants on like-minded hawkish Washington think tanks.
Patty cake, patty cake banker’s man, Joe Biden is the choice to protect the Wall Street Banks. Joe Biden is sold as the everyman, just a regular Joe. That is, if everyman, regular Joe is a serial killer. When serial killers are caught neighbors say, he just seemed like a nice guy, no one you’d ever think would kill innocent people. Joe has been a reliable banker’s man and so have his sons.
That’s why Wall Street banks laundered three quarters of a billion dollars into the Obama Biden Campaign in prepaid, untraceable $200 or less credit card donations. Good old Joe Biden has been a real money maker for Wall Street banks his entire career. And what did Wall Street get for their money from Joe Biden? For one thing, a for profit prison system. From MSN.com:
WASHINGTON — When Joseph R. Biden Jr. became the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee in 1987, a few months ahead of his first and ultimately unsuccessful presidential campaign, he told aides his goal was to enact legislation that would take a comprehensive approach to reducing crime.
As the ranking minority member of the committee since 1981, Mr. Biden had helped pass two bills establishing mandatory minimums for drug offenses. But as chairman, facing high violent crime rates, a crack cocaine epidemic, and accusations by Republicans that his party was soft on crime, Mr. Biden wanted holistic reform.
The effort, which defined much of his time as committee chairman, culminated in the 1994 Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, a sweeping, bipartisan bill that touched nearly every aspect of American law enforcement that was signed into law by President Bill Clinton.
Yes, Joe Biden’s role in privatizing prisons for profit in 1987 as chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee was a great big caaching for Wall Street Banks. And how did that work out for the American people, particularly black Americans? From the Sentencing Project:
Private sector involvement in prisons is not new — federal and state governments have had a long history of contracting out specific services to private firms, including medical services, food preparation, vocational training, and inmate transportation.
The 1980s, though, ushered in a new era of prison privatization. With a burgeoning prison population resulting from the “war on drugs” and increased use of incarceration, prison overcrowding and rising costs became increasingly problematic for local, state, and federal governments.
In response to this expanding criminal justice system, private business interests saw an opportunity for expansion, and consequently, private-sector involvement in prisons moved from the simple contracting of services to contracting for the complete management and operation of entire prisons.
Today, the privatization of prisons refers both to the takeover of existing public facilities by private operators and to the building and operation of new and additional prisons by for-profit prison companies…
And that is just one of the lucrative deals Wall Street’s bag man Joe Biden delivered. Then there was old black-hearted Zionist Joe Biden’s one two punch to students and their families. First punch was the total privatization of Sallie Mae, the government backed student loan program and the second punch the Bankruptcy Protection for Predatory Lenders Bill.
Excerpted from Salon
The federal government’s efforts to help students pay for college have resulted in the accumulation of a trillion dollars of student loan debt and a constant political struggle over the proper role of the public and private sector. Sallie Mae — created by the government but now fully private — is at the heart of the struggle; a deep-pocketed corporation with powerful political connections and its fingers stuck deeply in every part of the student lending pie.
The class action suit claimed that in 2006-2007, as it prepared itself for a lucrative purchase by a consortium of banks and private equity investors, Sallie Mae lowered its lending standards to bolster its portfolio of high-interest-earning “subprime” private student loans. But, when the economy started to crash and default rates spiked, Sallie Mae attempted to hide the damage by changing its loan forbearance policy to punt defaults into the future. In the proposed settlement, the two parties agreed to the creation of a $35 million pool to “resolve investor claims.”
That may be good news for the investors and sounds like a relatively cheap price for Sallie Mae to pay to avoid a trial. But the settlement offers nothing to the targets of Sallie Mae’s reckless attempt to pump up its profits: the students who were lured into taking out the loans to pay for their education. Private sector loans typically come with much higher interest rates than government-backed loans. It’s a toxic mix almost guaranteed to increase economic hardship: low-income students, high-interest loans and stratospheric default rates.
“While the shareholders look like they’re going to make out well, the real victims of Sallie Mae’s apparent scheme — the low-income and working-class students who should have never been steered to take out these high-cost, risky subprime private loans in the first place — will not get even a penny of relief from this settlement agreement,” said Steven Burd, a specialist in higher education at the New America Foundation. “Sallie Mae will essentially get off scot-free, while many of these borrowers will be stuck with this debt hanging over them for the rest of their lives….”
As it completed its journey to full privatization, Sallie Mae rapidly became the dominant force in student lending, with net profit approaching $2 billion a year, and a total portfolio of student debt near $100 billion — which in 2005, represented 45 percent of all federally backed student loans. From 1999-2004, Sallie Mae’s top two executives, Al Lord and Tom Fitzpatrick, received compensation worth $225 million and $245 million, respectively.
So from the time Sallie Mae was fully privatized, the tax payers paid their top two executives $225 million and $245 million respectively. Good old Joe Biden, looks like Wall Street Banks and Credit Card Companies got a real bargain with Joe Biden.
So Zionist Joe is thinking of throwing his hat in the ring due to Hillary Clinton’s vulnerability caused by constant leaks about her e-mails on her personal server. Much like the Watergate Scandal where President Richard Nixon used the power of his office to sabotage the Presidential candidacy of George McGovern, looks like ethically challenged, Joe the Wall Street bagman is using the power of his office to sabotage the Presidential candidacy of Hillary Clinton.
It’s quite a scandal, the State Department, under John Kerry has assigned a team to sort through Hillary’s emails and slowly releases them in tranches. Damaging lies are fed to Zionist Rupert Murdoch who floods the airwaves with misinformation about Hillary Clinton. Then Murdoch conducts polls showing Hillary Clinton is vulnerable due to all the leaks about her e-mails and clears the way for Joe Biden.
They even have enlisted Bob Woodward, the Republican Watergate era reporter who along with Carl Bernstein broke the Watergate story. From National Memo:
Clinton Emails: Is This Watergate? Or Just Another Whitewater?
Hillary Hysteria is raging everywhere, from the most disreputable websites to the most respected newspapers. Candidate Clinton’s polling numbers are down. Her email server is in the custody of the FBI. Her comments brushing aside the controversy have only infuriated the Washington press corps, which has virtually declared war on her.
But why is the political press so agitated? Is this Watergate, a shattering scandal with profound implications for national security and the Constitution? Or is it Whitewater, a meaningless squib of a failed real estate investment, absurdly inflated by the national media and partisan adversaries?
According to many journalists – along with the Republican Party and its favorite propagandists – the email uproar surrounding Clinton equals the worst political scandal in modern American history. On Fox News, eminent analyst Meghan McCain thrilled credulous viewers by telling them the Clinton emails “could be this generation’s Watergate.” On MSNBC, Bob Woodward of The Washington Post, excited his Morning Joe hosts with a similar comparison that echoed across the media.
“Follow the trail here,” intoned Woodward, who broke the Watergate story four decades ago with Carl Bernstein. “You’ve got a massive amount of data. It, in a way, reminds me of the Nixon tapes: thousands of hours of secretly recorded conversations that Nixon thought were exclusively his,” he said, adding: “Hillary Clinton initially took that position: ‘I’m not turning this over, there’s gonna be no cooperation.’ Now they’re cooperating.”
But like so much of the commentary about Clinton’s emails, that last remark by Woodward was entirely inaccurate — as he should know.
When the State Department first requested emails for its archives from all living former secretaries of state, Clinton was the only one to provide any files at all; both Condoleezza Rice and Colin Powell said they no longer possessed the emails they had sent on private servers. And when the FBI asked to examine Clinton’s server to determine whether her emails contained any information that was or ought to have been classified, her attorneys turned it over immediately.
Yes, all the hysteria over Hillary’s e-mails that John Kerry’s and Joe Biden’s State Department requested were turned over to them, unlike Colin Powel and Condoleezza Rice’s e-mails that potentially would show real criminal culpability for the lies fed to a terrified nation that led to the $2 trillion dollar war in Iraq.
Woodward swiftly amended his hyperbolic outburst, saying that his Nixon comparison referred to “the volume of emails” measured against the White House tapes, rather than any attack on the character of the Democratic frontrunner.
Perhaps Woodward suddenly remembered what actually occurred during Watergate – a series of gangster conspiracies based in the Nixon White House that included burglaries, warrantless wiretaps, illegal spying, campaign dirty tricks, election tampering, money laundering, and assorted thuggish schemes, growing into a cover-up that compounded those initial felonies with still more crimes committed by lawyers and bureaucrats who collected corporate bribes and then handed out hush money to the perpetrators.
But don’t forget what the e-mails are really about. Susan Rice went on national TV and lied to the American people about the attacks that took place in Benghazi, Libya on the anniversary of the 9-11 attacks in 2012 to protect Barack Obama who was in the middle of his presidential campaign.
The real questions is not, did Hillary send or receive classified e-mails on her private server, but who told Susan Rice, UN Ambassador to go on TV and lie. From Nick Gillespie at Reason .Com:
Thank Sid Blumenthal for Telling Hillary Clinton Benghazi Was a Planned Attack
What did she know and when did she know it? More important: WTF were we doing in Libya to begin with?
The worst thing about the endless investigations into the September 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya—an attack that killed four Americans, including Amb. Chris Stevens—is that they obscure the larger picture: WTF were we doing in Libya in the first place?
President Obama involved us in a war situation (called a "kinetic action" back then, if memory serves) not just without congressional approval but without any sort of consultation. For the entire 21st century, under both Reps and Dems, American foreign policy has been an #EPICFAIL, but current Republicans keep focusing in on small-ball questions about what did Hillary or Obama or Susan Rice know and when did she/he/she know it….
[Blumenthal's] memo said the attacks were by "demonstrators" who "were inspired by what many devout Libyan viewed as a sacrilegious internet video on the prophet Mohammed originating in America." Mrs. Clinton forwarded the memo to Mr. Sullivan, saying "More info." (Pages 193-195)...
The next day, Mr. Blumenthal sent Mrs. Clinton a more thorough account of what had occurred. Citing "sensitive sources" in Libya, the memo provided extensive detail about the episode, saying that the siege had been set off by members of Ansar al-Shariah, the Libyan terrorist group.
Those militants had ties to Al Qaeda, had planned the attacks for a month and had used a nearby protest as cover for the siege, the memo said. "We should get this around asap" Mrs. Clinton said in an email to Mr. Sullivan. "Will do," he responded.
That information contradicted the Obama administration's narrative at the time about what had spawned the attacks. Republicans have said the administration misled the country about the attacks because it did not want to undermine the notion that President Obama, who was up for re-election, was winning the war on terrorism. (Pages 200-203).
Score one for Sid Vicious. This exchange suggests that Clinton knew by September 13 that the attacks were not a spontaneous demonstration. Other accounts show that "within 15 minutes" of the attack "that it was terrorism."
National Security Advisor Susan Rice would hit five major talk shows on Sunday, September 16 (Clinton was not available, we were told) and gave variations on the theme that "it was a spontaneous—not a premeditated—response."
So is the whole Hillary Clinton e-mail hysteria really Joe Biden’s Watergate? Are government agencies being used to undermine a Clinton Presidency in order to continue the devastating foreign policy of the PNAC crowd? Did Zionist Joe Biden tell Susan Rice to lie to America about Benghazi to ensure the reelection of Barack Obama just like Nixon used government agencies to reelect Richard Nixon?
That is the real question. Is Joe Biden part of the secret society John Kennedy warned us about?
By Patricia Baeten