Syria has been ground zero in the CIA’s war of terror and
the “convenient” timing of the horrific attack on innocent civilians in Paris
have many who have intimate knowledge of CIA operations questioning if the Paris attacks were actually
false flag attacks. From Paul CraigRoberts.com:
Excerpt:
Another Paris False Flag Attack? — Paul Craig Roberts
At 7pm on Friday 13th we do not
have much information about the “terrorist attacks” in Paris other than that
Paris is closed down like Boston was after the “Boston Marathon Bombing,” also
a suspected false flag event.
Possibly believable evidence will
be presented that the Paris attacks were real terrorist attacks. However, what
do refugees have to gain from making themselves unwelcome with acts of violence
committed against the host country, and where
do refugees in France obtain automatic weapons and bombs? Indeed, where would the French themselves obtain
them?
The millions of refugees from Washington’s wars who are overrunning
Europe are bringing to the forefront of European politics the anti-EU nationalists parties, such
as Pegida in Germany, Nigel Farage’s UK Independence Party, and Marine Le Pen’s
National Front Party in France. These anti-EU political parties are also
anti-immigrant political parties.
The latest French poll shows that, as a result of the refugees from
Washington’s wars, Marine Le Pen has come out on top of the candidates for the
next French presidential election.
By supporting for 14 years Washington’s neoconservative wars for US
hegemony over the Middle East, establishment European governments eroded their electoral support.
European peoples want to be French, German, Dutch, Italian, Hungarian, Czech,
British. They do not want their countries to be a diverse Tower of Babel
created by millions of refugees from Washington’s war.
To remain a nationality unto
themselves is what Pegida, Farage, and Le Pen offer the voters.
Realizing its vulnerability, it is entirely possible that the French
Establishment made a decision to protect its hold on power with a false flag attack that would
allow the Establishment to close France’s borders and, thereby, deprive Marine Le Pen of her main political
issue…
So is Dr. Roberts correct, were the attacks in Paris on
Friday the Thirteenth a False Flag? From
Stephen Lendman at Paul Craig Roberts.org:
Excerpt:
Profile of a False Flag
by Stephen Lendman
Evidence known so far strongly
indicates false flag responsibility for Friday’s Paris attacks. They’re usually
identifiable the way fingerprints ID people.
They’re strategically timed, most often for what’s planned to
follow….
The 9/11 incident provided a
treasure trove of giveaways showing what happened was other than the official
narrative. The most obvious was how
could a handful of terrorists outwit America’s 16 intelligence agencies,
including sophisticated NSA eavesdropping on anyone or anything suspicious back
then?...
…Will Friday’s Paris attack unravel
the same way? Odds strongly suggest it.
Important clues already exist.
Again most important: How could a few
terrorists outwit French intelligence? The attacks were a carefully
orchestrated, well planned military operation requiring some degree of
sophistication…
Operatives were armed with
automatic weapons and explosive belts.
How could they have entered attack sites unnoticed? How was this possible –
dressed in black heavily armed?
They were well known to French
security agencies, likely kept under surveillance. Why was nothing done to
prevent the attacks or intervene straightaway once they began?
Syrian and Egyptian passports were
found at the Stade de France stadium, one of the attack sites, begging the
obvious question: Why would operatives
carry IDs? Clearly they were planted – the Mohamed Atta scheme redux….
French President Francois Hollande
straightaway blamed ISIS despite no evidence indicating its involvement. His
behavior was an automatic red flag….
Hollande’s low 12% approval rating needed something to boost it.
Following the January Charlie Hebdo/kosher market attacks, his popularity
increased by 21%.
On 9/10/01, George Bush’s approval
rating hovered around 50%. A day later, it shot up to 90%. Expect Hollande to
get a similar boost, especially after vowing “pitiless war” on ISIS.
Yes indeed, as Stephen Landman points out False Flag attacks
are “strategically timed, most often for what’s planned to follow” and
what was to follow? Why the G20 Summit
of course. Prior to the Paris terrorist attacks, the CIA war against Assad was
rapidly losing support. From New YorkTimes
Excerpt:
AL UDEID AIR
BASE, Qatar — As the United States
prepares to intensify airstrikes against the Islamic State in Syria, the
Arab allies who with great fanfare
sent warplanes on the initial missions there a year ago have largely vanished from the campaign.
The Obama
administration heralded the Arab air forces flying side by side with American
fighter jets in the campaign’s early days as an important show of solidarity
against the Islamic State….
But as the United States enters a critical
phase of the war in Syria, ordering Special Operations troops to support rebel
forces and sending two dozen attack planes to Turkey, the air campaign has
evolved into a largely American effort….
The engagement
of Western allies, like France and Australia, has also been limited. They have
conducted a smattering of strikes in Syria, but have reserved most of their
firepower for Islamic State targets in Iraq.
Canada’s new prime minister, Justin
Trudeau, has promised to fulfill his campaign pledge to end Ottawa’s role in
the air campaign altogether. And none of the Western allies appear eager to
join the United States in basing warplanes at Incirlik air base in Turkey, a
move that would make it easier to increase strikes against militants in northern
Syria and Iraq…
Defense Secretary Ashton B. Carter has
promised Congress that the air war in Syria will escalate “with a higher and
heavier rate of strikes,” including more
attacks against top Islamic State leaders and oil fields that remain one of the group’s main financial lifelines.
But the revamped effort is already facing challenges…
The recent election of the hard-left Jeremy
Corbyn as the leader of the Labour Party and Russia’s military intervention
in Syria have made it even less likely
that Mr. Cameron will call for a vote.
Yes, the
“recent election of the hard-left Jeremy Corbyn” made it less likely that
Cameron would call for a vote to escalate the war in Syria and demand the
removal of Bashar Assad, the elected Syrian president. But with the “terrorist attack” in Paris, the
opposition to the Syrian fiasco has been muted.
From BBC News:
Excerpt:
Jeremy
Corbyn has cancelled a speech in which he was set to defend his leadership of
Labour, in light of the Paris attacks…
He
had planned to talk about foreign policy, the economy and politics.
Mr Corbyn had been due to say that he would
take no lectures in patriotism from the Conservatives….
The
Labour leader was set to say: "For the past 14 years, Britain has been at
the centre of a succession of disastrous wars that have brought devastation to
large parts of the wider Middle East.
"They have increased, not diminished,
the threats to our own national security in the process".
He
would have added: "What's
pro-British about a government that slashes support for serving soldiers and
military veterans?
"How
is it patriotic to take money from the poorest, from working families, and hand
control of your country to a super-rich elite?"
The CIA has been overtly arming and training mercenaries to
fight in Syria and to remove the democratically elected Assad from power. From Wall Street Journal:
The U.S. and its regional allies agreed to increase shipments of
weapons and other supplies to help
moderate Syrian rebels hold their ground and challenge the intervention of
Russia and Iran on behalf of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, U.S.
officials and their counterparts in the region said.
The deliveries from the Central Intelligence Agency, Saudi Arabia
and other allied spy services deepen the
fight between the forces battling in Syria, despite President Barack
Obama’s public pledge to not let the conflict become a U.S.-Russia proxy war.
Saudi officials not only pushed for the White House to keep the
arms pipeline open, but also warned the
administration against backing away from a longstanding demand that Mr. Assad
must leave office.
In the past month of intensifying Russian airstrikes, the CIA and
its partners have increased the flow of
military supplies to rebels in northern Syria, including of U.S.-made TOW antitank missiles, these officials said.
Those supplies will continue to increase
in coming weeks, replenishing stocks
depleted by the regime’s expanded military offensive.
An Obama administration official said
the military pressure is needed to push Mr. Assad from power…
In addition to the arms the U.S. has agreed to provide, Saudi and
Turkish officials have renewed talks with their American counterparts about allowing limited supplies of shoulder-fire
man-portable air-defense systems, or Manpads, to select rebels.
Those weapons could help target
regime aircraft, in particular those responsible for dropping barrel bombs, and
could also help keep Russian air power
at bay, the officials said.
Mr. Obama has long rebuffed such
proposals, citing the risk to civilian aircraft and fears they could end up in
the hands of terrorists….
Why Obama capitulated to the CIA and allowed the agency to
supply unvetted enemies of the State of Syria with advanced weaponry is a
mystery given the CIA’s past history of failure. From Antiwar.com:
Excerpt:
US Weapons Drops Arming Unvetted Syrian Rebel Factions
Past US programs of smuggling arms
into Syria for “vetted” rebel factions have mostly failed, and left a lot of weapons in the hands of
Islamist factions like ISIS and al-Qaeda. Incredibly, with the return to
throwing arms at Syria’s Civil War, the US is moving away from the vetting
part.
Pentagon officials are conceding that this week’s airdrops of weapons
and ammunition to rebels in northeast Syria are going to wholly unvetted forces, saying it is a “moot point” since the
rebels are meant to be fighting ISIS, and not the Syrian government.
The problem here is pretty clear, because one of the big reasons
for vetting was to try to keep US weaponry out of the hands of factions that
might give them to terrorist groups. That the factions are in close proximity
to ISIS doesn’t “moot” the question of whether the groups are ultimately going to sell or give the arms to ISIS.
Pentagon officials are refusing to talk about the “restrictions” on
these arms drops, but did say that they
“ask” the factions to use them to fight ISIS, and apparently that’s
tantamount to a full-fledged vetting process these days.
The CIA’s war in Syria has been a
failure and Russia’s bombing campaign against the CIA backed rebels has been a
giant success. From Express U.K.:
Excerpt:
More than 800,000 refugees RETURNING to
Syria as Putin OBLITERATES Islamic State
MORE than
800,000 refugees are set to return to Syria thanks to Vladimir Putin's efforts
to smash the Islamic State
Last month
Moscow launched a bombing campaign against the twisted State terror group,
which controls vast swathes of Syria and has forced thousands of people to flee
the country.
Many desperate
asylum seekers have made their way to Europe via boats to Greece, with David
Cameron agreeing to let 20,000 in Britain over the next five years.
But Russia's bid
to wipe out ISIS has been so successful
that almost a million Syrians are elected to return to their homeland,
Russian politician Dmitry Sablin claimed.
The senator, who
recently visited Syria, said: "[Syrian
president Bashar al] Assad praised the actions of the Russian Aerospace Forces
in Syria.
"He said
thousands of terrorists are now fleeing Syria, and refugees are
returning."
Russian fighter jets have destroyed 285
ISIS and al-Nusra Front targets in the war-torn country over the past three
days, according to Russian media.
The al-Nusra
Front – the Syrian branch of Al-Qaeda – was formed in 2012 during the on-going
Syrian civil war.
Putin's military operation began on
September 30 after an official request
from Assad, his long-time ally…
"People in Syria are now discussing
their future. They want to rebuild their country.
"People are
now walking safely through the streets of Damascus. There are fountains and restaurants open.
"Before
Russia engaged it was terrifying to live there."
The Paris terrorist attacks have changed the focus of the
G20 Summit. From Reuters:
Excerpt:
Obama vows effort to eliminate Islamic State as G20 seeks common Syria
strategy
U.S. President Barack Obama vowed on Sunday to step up efforts to
eliminate Islamic State in Syria and prevent it from carrying out attacks
like those in Paris, while European leaders urged Russia to focus its military efforts on the radical Islamists.
Speaking at a G20 leaders summit in
Turkey, Obama described the killings in
Paris claimed by Islamic State as an attack on the civilized world and said
the United States would work with France to hunt down those responsible….
Washington already expects France to retaliate by taking on a
larger role in the U.S.-led coalition's
bombing campaign against Islamic State.
But European Council President Donald Tusk said Russia too should focus its military operations on
Islamic State, rather than on the
Syrian opposition battling President Bashar al-Assad, urging
cooperation between Washington and Moscow.
Meanwhile British Prime Minister David Cameron used the G20
Summit to attempt to persuade Russian President Vladimir Putin to stop bombing
the “moderate” terrorists who are armed and financed by the U.S. From The Guardian:
Excerpt:
David Cameron is to hold his first bilateral talks with Vladimir
Putin at the G20 summit in Turkey, where he will seek to persuade the Russian president that his country’s bombing
campaign in Syria is only going to prolong the conflict.
The prime minister, along with other western leaders, was taken
aback by Putin’s launch of a bombing
campaign in Syria designed to prop up the country’s president, Bashar
al-Assad, that has targeted moderate
opposition groups in addition to Islamic State. Cameron will attempt at the
summit to persuade the Russian president
that Assad is a barrier to long-term peace in Syria.
Syria, ground
zero in the CIA’s war of terror, will now be the launch pad of World War III as
any opposition to the illegal war against the Syrian government is
stifled. Remember the words of Herman
Goering at the Nuremberg trials:
"Of course the people don't want war.
But after all, it's the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and
it's always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it's a democracy,
a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or
no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That
is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce
the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater
danger."
By Patricia
Baeten
No comments:
Post a Comment