Statute:
Section 212(f) “Whenever
the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into
the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States,
he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend
the entry of all aliens or class of aliens as “immigrants or nonimmigrants, or
impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.”
When Donald Trump was on the campaign trail and the San
Bernardino terror attack took place Trump said he would place a temporary ban
on travel from countries known as havens for terrorists until the government
could figure out “what the hell was going on.”
Trump’s comments came after it was known that all of the terrorist attackers,
from the Tsarnaev brothers, to the Pulse Nightclub shooter to the San
Bernardino shooters were all well-known to the FBI before the attacks took
place. From the Activist:
Excerpt:
Was Orlando Shooting A False Flag?
Shooter Has Ties To FBI, Regular At Club, Did Not Act Alone?
As mainstream media organizations
continue to be afire with reports regarding the recent Orlando shooting, a
number of details are escaping the public consciousness that might point to an
even more sinister motivation for the killing of 50 innocent people at the
Pulse nightclub. Most notably, that the
attack could very well have been orchestrated by the FBI and other relevant
U.S. intelligence agencies in order to guide public opinion, galvanize the
American people, and for other “political” purposes.
Indeed, in my article “5 Reasons To
Question The Official Story Of The Orlando Shooting,” I listed a number of
questionable aspects regarding the shooting such as the fact that the FBI was well aware of Omar Mateen, his
ideology, and his potential violence years before the attack yet did nothing, as well as the fact
that his father is a Taliban-supporting TV host from Afghanistan. I also
pointed out that Mateen himself had
connections to a known ISIS recruiter and suicide bomber. In addition, I
discussed the FBI’s history in relation to creating terrorist attacks in order
to “bust” them and subsequently take the credit for stopping terrorist attacks…
According to CNN’s article, “50
Killed in Florida Nightclub, Shooter Pledged ISIS Allegiance,” two officials
tell CNN that the FBI had investigated Mateen at some point for possibly having
ties to or sympathizing with Islamic extremism…
One key aspect suggesting a false flag that should be looked for
soon after the attack is any possible
connection the suspect or group of suspects may have had with intelligence
agencies…
For instance, on 9/11, many of the alleged hijackers had
previously had close contact with the FBI, CIA, and other high-level
intelligence agencies (both home and abroad). Likewise, the Tsarnaev brothers who have been accused of masterminding and
carrying out the Boston Bombing had ties
to the FBI before the attack.
The FBI did much more than simply “investigate” Mateen – they introduced him to “informants” as well.
According to the New York Daily News in the article, “FBI spied on Orlando gay
club terrorist Omar Mateen for 10 months in 2013: FBI Director James Comey…” Mateen was not only connected to Mohammed Abu
Salha, he also maintained ties with
Marcus Dwayne Robertson, a notoriously violent radical Muslim/CIA Asset…
For some time Tony Cartalucci of
Land Destroyer has been painstakingly documenting instances of the FBI organized, arming, funding, and
directing domestic terror attacks only to foil those attacks later and
claim success in preventing terror attacks on American soil as well as the possibility that many of these attacks
simply do not get foiled but are allowed to take place for political purposes.
“If you don't read the newspaper,
you're uninformed. If you read the newspaper, you're misinformed.” ― Mark Twain
After the Boston bombing attacks and the Pulse Nightclub
attack, the San Bernardino attack had similar aspects, such as the shooters
were known to the FBI. From VeteransToday:
Excerpt:
LA Times suppresses truth on San Bernardino false flag
Mainstream media's fake news must
not be questioned
Today’s LA Times disinformation
piece, published on this, the first anniversary of the 12/2/15 shooting at the
Inland Regional Center, raises questions concerning the much-discussed problem
of “fake news…” The mainstream
media, backed by big internet companies like Google and Facebook, claim that
dissenting alternative media outlets are the prime source of “fake news”
stories. But what happens when the
mainstream media itself publishes fake news?
In reality, the mainstream media is almost nothing but fake news: The
vast majority of mainstream “news” stories begin as press releases, that is, lies or spin generated for
profit by a private, interested party… The people who blew up the World Trade Center
on 9/11/2001, and have since then massacred thousands in such follow-up operations as Bali, Madrid,
London, Mumbai, Boston, Paris, San
Bernardino, and Orlando, are powerful players…
…The false flag terror perps chose
this strategy as an attempt to blow smoke over the real questions about the
attack raised by real journalists (the alternative media)…
Why did multiple eyewitnesses report that the shooters were “three
large white paramilitaries” – a shooter team that could not possibly be
mistaken for a bearded brown-skinned Muslim guy and his diminutive female
alleged accomplice?
Why did police (or intelligence agents/organized crime assets whose
cover job is police work) handcuff and
execute the two Muslim patsies in a police car, then dump the bodies on the
sidewalk?
Why was the most important alleged crime scene (the patsies’
apartment) not preserved according
to normal police procedure, but instead immediately opened for a media
propaganda stunt so that any evidence there would be ransacked, contaminated or
destroyed?
The LA Times refuses to even acknowledge the existence of false flag
interpretations of the shooting, and ruthlessly suppresses any such mention
from its comments section. Instead, the official “radical Muslims did it” myth is taken for granted, and the
“questions” that the FBI is supposedly “struggling to answer” involve whether
any MORE “radical Muslims” might have known something was up.
It appears to me that the outrage over Donald Trump’s
Executive Order for a temporary ban on immigrants from countries where the CIA
has been funding and arming terrorists to overthrow the elected governments
and/or providing bombs and logistics to Saudi Arabia and Turkey to destroy
their nations, has more to do with disrupting American intelligence
assets/patsies. These war-torn nations, Iraq,
Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen are unable to properly vet who is
leaving their country to enter the United States, brewing a perfect storm.
President Barack Obama used his
veto power on Friday to protect the Islamic kingdom of Saudi Arabia from
lawsuits by families of the victims of the 9/11 Islamic atrocity — Breitbart
Saudi Arabia, who aided and abetted the 9-11 terrorists was
not happy when Donald Trump, on the campaign trail called for a temporary ban
on Muslims from countries that the Obama Administration designated “hotbeds of
terrorism.” From the Express Tribune:
Excerpt:
Trump hits back at 'dopey' Saudi billionaire
WASHINGTON: Donald Trump hit back
at a “dopey” Saudi Arabian fellow billionaire after the prince branded him a
disgrace and said he should pull out of the race for the White House. Prince
Alwaleed bin Talal had reacted to the Republican presidential frontrunner’s proposal earlier this week that all Muslims
should be temporarily barred from entering the United States. Saudi Prince Alwaleed calls Trump a
disgrace to US, asks him to quit presidential race.
“Dopey Prince Alwaleed Talal wants to control our US politicians with
daddy’s money. Can’t do it when I get elected,” Trump wrote on Twitter, in
the same typically confrontational fashion that has been the earmark of his
bombastic presidential campaign.
It came after Alwaleed, a devout
but moderate Muslim, took exception to what his office called Trump’s
“anti-Islam statement.” “You are a
disgrace not only to the GOP but to all America,” Alwaleed had tweeted to
Trump, referring to the Republican Party.
“Withdraw from the US
presidential race as you will never win.”
Alwaleed is an unusually outspoken member of the Saudi royal family who
chairs Kingdom Holding Co. The
diversified firm’s interests include US-banking giant Citigroup.
Trump has been lambasted both in
the US and abroad for his Muslim plan, which followed a shooting rampage by a Muslim couple in San Bernardino, California,
which left 14 dead.
Forget about investigating Russian interference with the
American presidential election, a known terrorist state has threatened Donald
Trump and ordered him to drop out of the presidential election. Investigate Saudi Arabia’s interference in
American elections.
The job of the Ninth Circuit Court was to interpret the law
and determine if Donald Trump was within his legal authority when he found that
“the entry of any aliens from seven war-torn nations overrun by CIA backed
terrorists was detrimental to the interests of the United States and therefore
proclaimed that for a period of 90 days, he suspended entry of all immigrants
or nonimmigrants until he could be assured that they were properly vetted, using
extreme vetting.”
CIA-armed militias are shooting
at Pentagon-armed ones in Syria - Chicago Tribune
The Ninth Circuit court decided to base their decision on
emotion rather than the law. In Syria,
where the CIA and Pentagon have trained and armed terrorists on both sides of
the US/NATO induced conflict, even Syria’s President Assad has stated the
obvious, terrorists are among the refugees.
From Real Clear Politics:
Excerpt:
Bashar al-Assad: Terrorists Are Definitely Hiding Among Syrian Refugees
In an interview with Yahoo News's
Michael Isikoff, the Syrian President
Bashar al-Assad said that terrorists were definitely hiding among the more than
4.8 million people who have been displaced by the Syrian Civil War. Asked if some of those who fled are
"aligned with terrorists," Assad quickly replied: "Definitely."
"You can find it on the
Net," Assad went on. "Those terrorists in Syria, holding the machine
gun or killing people, they [appear as] peaceful refugees in Europe or in the
West." "You don’t need a significant number to commit atrocities,"
he noted. He also said that the 9/11 attacks were pulled off by fewer than 20
terrorists, "out of maybe millions of immigrants in the United States. So
it’s not about the number, it’s about the quality, it’s about the
intentions."
Secret
Pentagon Report Reveals US "Created" ISIS As A "Tool" To
Overthrow Syria's President Assad – Zero hedge
And if you don’t want to believe Syria’s elected President
Assad, there’s this from IJR.com:
Excerpt:
Remember Those 'Moderate' Syrian Rebels That The U.S. Armed? ISIS Got
Some Of Those Weapons Too
As the Syrian Civil War has waged
on over the past few years, the United States, along with Arab states such as
Saudi Arabia and Qatar, decided to arm the Syrian rebels under the “Free Syrian
Army” umbrella. The shipments of former
Yugoslavian Army weapons held by the Croatians, along with newly manufactured
Croatian weapons, began in November 2012, according to The Telegraph UK. The weapons were flown out of Croatia on chartered
flights to Jordan and then smuggled into Syria.
Fast forward to the rise of ISIS
and their blitzkreig campaign across northern Iraq. An investigation by the arms control organization Conflict Armament
Research has found that various U.S.
supplied weapons have wound up in the hands of ISIS. The U.S.-made small arm in question is the
M16A4 assault rifle. It is the main service rifle of the U.S. Marine Corps and
sees limited use in the U.S. Army. More importantly, thousands of them were
supplied to the Iraqi Army. The source
of ISIS's M16s, along with other U.S. made weapons, is likely captured
Iraqi Army stocks.
As for the M79s, they were part of
the arms shipments from Croatia that were meant for the Free Syrian Army. The
weapons were either captured, or acquired by former FSA fighters as they
joined ISIS.
Forget about what our NATO “allies” think about President
Trump’s Executive Order, what do Europeans thinks of Trump’s temporary
ban? From Chatham House:
Excerpt:
What Do Europeans Think About Muslim Immigration?
President Donald Trump’s executive order to ban citizens of seven
Muslim-majority states from entering the US for 90 days, and temporarily
freeze all refugee arrivals (including Syrians indefinitely), has been interpreted widely as an attempt to curtail the inward
migration of Muslims, which Trump and his supporters argue pose a threat to
national security.
Trump’s policy has generated a backlash among some of Europe’s
leaders…
Amid these competing views, where do the public in European countries
stand on the specific issue of Muslim immigration? There is evidence to
suggest that both Trump and these radical right-wing parties reflect an underlying reservoir of public
support.
Drawing on a unique, new Chatham
House survey of more than 10,000 people
from 10 European states, we can throw new light on what people think about
migration from mainly Muslim countries. Our
results are striking and sobering…
In our survey, carried out before
President Trump’s executive order was announced, respondents were given
the following statement: ‘All further migration from mainly Muslim countries
should be stopped’. They were then asked to what extent did they agree or
disagree with this statement. Overall,
across all 10 of the European countries an average of 55% agreed that all
further migration from mainly Muslim countries should be stopped, 25% neither
agreed nor disagreed and 20% disagreed.
Majorities in all but two of the ten states agreed, ranging from 71% in
Poland, 65% in Austria, 53% in Germany and 51% in Italy to 47% in the
United Kingdom and 41% in Spain. In no country did the percentage that
disagreed surpass 32%.
It is
enough that the people know there was an election. The people who cast the
votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything. -
Joseph Stalin
Therein lies the problem, world leaders including in the
United States, do not care what the people want. The leaders, aided by a universally corrupt
media, worry not about re-election for they control the electoral process. For instance in France where Francois Fillon,
member of the conservative Les Republicans political party upended the election
with his surprise primary win has been savaged by the media. Fillon has been the victim of a vicious media
campaign to discredit him. From RussiaToday:
Excerpt:
French media brands presidential hopeful Fillon as ‘Putin’s friend’
French presidential hopeful
Francois Fillon is “Vladimir Putin’s friend” and intends to “work ardently”
with Russia, French media trumpeted after
the country was caught unawares by the Republican’s victory in the first
round of the center-right primary. During
the first primary on Sunday, Fillon, who served as prime minister in Nicolas
Sarkozy’s government from 2007 till 2012, not only beat his former boss, but
also came in first ahead of Alain Juppe, the 71-year-old ex-prime minister and
mayor of Bordeaux.
Contrary to the current French
establishment, Fillon advocates lifting the EU sanctions imposed on
Russia for what Brussels (NATO) insists was “undermining of Ukrainian
sovereignty” following the 2014 Euromaidan coup in Kiev.
“Vladimir Putin can rejoice. If
Francois Fillon enters the Elysee [Palace], he will count a new friend in the
circle of Western leaders. Indeed, like
Donald Trump, the former French Prime Minister intends to work ardently with
Russia,” Le Point wrote on Monday…
“With the victory of Donald Trump and the
possible duel [between] Fillon-Le Pen in the second round of the French
presidential election, Vladimir Putin
could end up with ‘friends’ in power in two of the major capitals of the West,
Washington and Paris,” according to the publication…
The French media’s take on Fillon “is not
surprising,” … saying that it mainly supports Paris’ alliance with the
US and French-German relations. “Yet
in reality there is a large part of public opinion in France that not often
speak out openly, but know that there
can be no balance in Europe without a renewed and consistent alliance with
Russia…
The media's the most powerful
entity on earth. They have the power to make the innocent guilty and to make
the guilty innocent, and that's power. Because they control the minds of the
masses. - Malcolm X
As if cordial relations with Russia is a bad thing. So the French media took it upon themselves
to destroy Fillon, serving their elite masters.
From the New York Times:
Excerpt:
Fillon Scandal Indicts, Foremost, France’s Political Elite
PARIS — The president of the National Assembly does it. The president of
the Senate defends it. Dozens of
rank-and-file parliamentarians do it, too. Hiring your spouse, son or sister in France’s Parliament is perfectly
legal.
So, with François Fillon,
until recently France’s leading presidential candidate, in deep trouble
for payments of nearly $1 million from the public payroll to his wife and
children, many French politicians are asking: What’s the big deal? The
answer has, belatedly, come roaring back from much of the country’s press and public: They
just don’t get it.
“Penelopegate,” a scandal named for
Mr. Fillon’s wife, now threatens to sink the ambitions of a man who little
more than a week ago seemed all but certain to become France’s next president.
But the scandal has done more than
add another volatile element to France’s presidential campaign. It has also
tapped a wellspring of anger in the French electorate and called into question
the standard operating procedures of the political class…
The uproar has similarly lifted
the hopes of Emmanuel Macron, the former Rothschild banker and economy minister in the
Socialist government, who is running an insurgent campaign atop his own newly
formed political movement.
But I digress, so let’s get back to the Ninth Circuit
court’s decision regarding whether or not President Trump had the legal
authority to temporarily ban immigrants that he believes pose a danger to
American citizens. From Breitbart:
Excerpt:
Turley: Trump Making Same Arguments as Obama in Defense of Immigration
Executive Order
Thursday on MSNBC’s “The 11th
Hour,” George Washington University Law
School professor Jonathan Turley reacted to the Ninth Circuit Court of
Appeals decision to uphold a stay by a lower to halt President Donald Trump’s
executive order restricting immigration to the United States from seven
predominantly Muslim nations.
Although the court ruled in the
opponents of the Trump order’s favor, the
law still was on Trump’s side and that the Trump administration was using
the “virtually the identical arguments” the Obama administration had used in
defense of its immigration policy.
“Well, it was a poorly crafted
executive order, and it was a terrible rollout,” Turley said. “But I still
think that the law favors the
administration once you get to the merits. I don’t agree with many of
those, some of those cases. But the
courts have been highly deferential to the president, and they generally don’t second-guess. I think
the people also have to acknowledge that the Trump administration here is
making virtually the identical argument to the Obama administration.”
“The Obama administration argued the president’s judgment on
administration was largely unreviewable,” he continued. “He argued that he
could even refuse or order the failure to enforce immigration laws. But the
arguments were very, very similar. And for all the Democrats objecting now, I didn’t hear a peep of objection from them
when just last year these arguments were being made by the same Justice
Department.”
I think a more pertinent question is not “was Trump’s order
legal” but “what hath America wrought?”
The American courts have been corrupted to an unbelievable degree by the
George W. Bush Administration. From the
Extreme Supreme Court to the lower and appellate courts, all are corrupt and
packed with zealots, both right and left.
It is not for the Ninth Circuit court to second guess the
order but to read the law and interpret it.
Is it any wonder that Americans have lost all confidence in American jurisprudence? Americans have nothing but contempt for the
governing elite, the corrupt media and the courts.
By Patricia Baeten
No comments:
Post a Comment