Sunday, February 12, 2017

What hath America wrought? Trump fights Ninth Circuit Court to protect Americans “See you in court”


Section 212(f) “Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or class of aliens as “immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.”

When Donald Trump was on the campaign trail and the San Bernardino terror attack took place Trump said he would place a temporary ban on travel from countries known as havens for terrorists until the government could figure out “what the hell was going on.”  Trump’s comments came after it was known that all of the terrorist attackers, from the Tsarnaev brothers, to the Pulse Nightclub shooter to the San Bernardino shooters were all well-known to the FBI before the attacks took place.  From the Activist:


Was Orlando Shooting A False Flag? Shooter Has Ties To FBI, Regular At Club, Did Not Act Alone?

As mainstream media organizations continue to be afire with reports regarding the recent Orlando shooting, a number of details are escaping the public consciousness that might point to an even more sinister motivation for the killing of 50 innocent people at the Pulse nightclub. Most notably, that the attack could very well have been orchestrated by the FBI and other relevant U.S. intelligence agencies in order to guide public opinion, galvanize the American people, and for other “political” purposes.

Indeed, in my article “5 Reasons To Question The Official Story Of The Orlando Shooting,” I listed a number of questionable aspects regarding the shooting such as the fact that the FBI was well aware of Omar Mateen, his ideology, and his potential violence years before the attack yet did nothing, as well as the fact that his father is a Taliban-supporting TV host from Afghanistan. I also pointed out that Mateen himself had connections to a known ISIS recruiter and suicide bomber. In addition, I discussed the FBI’s history in relation to creating terrorist attacks in order to “bust” them and subsequently take the credit for stopping terrorist attacks…

According to CNN’s article, “50 Killed in Florida Nightclub, Shooter Pledged ISIS Allegiance,” two officials tell CNN that the FBI had investigated Mateen at some point for possibly having ties to or sympathizing with Islamic extremism…    One key aspect suggesting a false flag that should be looked for soon after the attack is any possible connection the suspect or group of suspects may have had with intelligence agencies…

For instance, on 9/11, many of the alleged hijackers had previously had close contact with the FBI, CIA, and other high-level intelligence agencies (both home and abroad). Likewise, the Tsarnaev brothers who have been accused of masterminding and carrying out the Boston Bombing had ties to the FBI before the attack.

The FBI did much more than simply “investigate” Mateen – they introduced him to “informants” as well. According to the New York Daily News in the article, “FBI spied on Orlando gay club terrorist Omar Mateen for 10 months in 2013: FBI Director James Comey…”  Mateen was not only connected to Mohammed Abu Salha, he also maintained ties with Marcus Dwayne Robertson, a notoriously violent radical Muslim/CIA Asset…

For some time Tony Cartalucci of Land Destroyer has been painstakingly documenting instances of the FBI organized, arming, funding, and directing domestic terror attacks only to foil those attacks later and claim success in preventing terror attacks on American soil as well as the possibility that many of these attacks simply do not get foiled but are allowed to take place for political purposes.

“If you don't read the newspaper, you're uninformed. If you read the newspaper, you're misinformed.”  ― Mark Twain

After the Boston bombing attacks and the Pulse Nightclub attack, the San Bernardino attack had similar aspects, such as the shooters were known to the FBI.  From VeteransToday:


LA Times suppresses truth on San Bernardino false flag
Mainstream media's fake news must not be questioned

Today’s LA Times disinformation piece, published on this, the first anniversary of the 12/2/15 shooting at the Inland Regional Center, raises questions concerning the much-discussed problem of “fake news…” The mainstream media, backed by big internet companies like Google and Facebook, claim that dissenting alternative media outlets are the prime source of “fake news” stories. But what happens when the mainstream media itself publishes fake news?

In reality, the mainstream media is almost nothing but fake news: The vast majority of mainstream “news” stories begin as press releases, that is, lies or spin generated for profit by a private, interested party…  The people who blew up the World Trade Center on 9/11/2001, and have since then massacred thousands in such follow-up operations as Bali, Madrid, London, Mumbai, Boston, Paris, San Bernardino, and Orlando, are powerful players…

…The false flag terror perps chose this strategy as an attempt to blow smoke over the real questions about the attack raised by real journalists (the alternative media)… 

Why did multiple eyewitnesses report that the shooters were “three large white paramilitaries” – a shooter team that could not possibly be mistaken for a bearded brown-skinned Muslim guy and his diminutive female alleged accomplice?

Why did police (or intelligence agents/organized crime assets whose cover job is police work) handcuff and execute the two Muslim patsies in a police car, then dump the bodies on the sidewalk?

Why was the most important alleged crime scene (the patsies’ apartment) not preserved according to normal police procedure, but instead immediately opened for a media propaganda stunt so that any evidence there would be ransacked, contaminated or destroyed?

The LA Times refuses to even acknowledge the existence of false flag interpretations of the shooting, and ruthlessly suppresses any such mention from its comments section. Instead, the official “radical Muslims did it” myth is taken for granted, and the “questions” that the FBI is supposedly “struggling to answer” involve whether any MORE “radical Muslims” might have known something was up.

It appears to me that the outrage over Donald Trump’s Executive Order for a temporary ban on immigrants from countries where the CIA has been funding and arming terrorists to overthrow the elected governments and/or providing bombs and logistics to Saudi Arabia and Turkey to destroy their nations, has more to do with disrupting American intelligence assets/patsies.  These war-torn nations, Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen are unable to properly vet who is leaving their country to enter the United States, brewing a perfect storm.

President Barack Obama used his veto power on Friday to protect the Islamic kingdom of Saudi Arabia from lawsuits by families of the victims of the 9/11 Islamic atrocity — Breitbart

Saudi Arabia, who aided and abetted the 9-11 terrorists was not happy when Donald Trump, on the campaign trail called for a temporary ban on Muslims from countries that the Obama Administration designated “hotbeds of terrorism.”  From the Express Tribune:


Trump hits back at 'dopey' Saudi billionaire

WASHINGTON: Donald Trump hit back at a “dopey” Saudi Arabian fellow billionaire after the prince branded him a disgrace and said he should pull out of the race for the White House.  Prince Alwaleed bin Talal had reacted to the Republican presidential frontrunner’s proposal earlier this week that all Muslims should be temporarily barred from entering the United States.  Saudi Prince Alwaleed calls Trump a disgrace to US, asks him to quit presidential race.

“Dopey Prince Alwaleed Talal wants to control our US politicians with daddy’s money. Can’t do it when I get elected,” Trump wrote on Twitter, in the same typically confrontational fashion that has been the earmark of his bombastic presidential campaign.

It came after Alwaleed, a devout but moderate Muslim, took exception to what his office called Trump’s “anti-Islam statement.”  “You are a disgrace not only to the GOP but to all America,” Alwaleed had tweeted to Trump, referring to the Republican Party.  “Withdraw from the US presidential race as you will never win.”  Alwaleed is an unusually outspoken member of the Saudi royal family who chairs Kingdom Holding Co. The diversified firm’s interests include US-banking giant Citigroup.

Trump has been lambasted both in the US and abroad for his Muslim plan, which followed a shooting rampage by a Muslim couple in San Bernardino, California, which left 14 dead.

Forget about investigating Russian interference with the American presidential election, a known terrorist state has threatened Donald Trump and ordered him to drop out of the presidential election.  Investigate Saudi Arabia’s interference in American elections.

The job of the Ninth Circuit Court was to interpret the law and determine if Donald Trump was within his legal authority when he found that “the entry of any aliens from seven war-torn nations overrun by CIA backed terrorists was detrimental to the interests of the United States and therefore proclaimed that for a period of 90 days, he suspended entry of all immigrants or nonimmigrants until he could be assured that they were properly vetted, using extreme vetting.”

CIA-armed militias are shooting at Pentagon-armed ones in Syria - Chicago Tribune

The Ninth Circuit court decided to base their decision on emotion rather than the law.  In Syria, where the CIA and Pentagon have trained and armed terrorists on both sides of the US/NATO induced conflict, even Syria’s President Assad has stated the obvious, terrorists are among the refugees.  From Real Clear Politics:


Bashar al-Assad: Terrorists Are Definitely Hiding Among Syrian Refugees

In an interview with Yahoo News's Michael Isikoff, the Syrian President Bashar al-Assad said that terrorists were definitely hiding among the more than 4.8 million people who have been displaced by the Syrian Civil War.   Asked if some of those who fled are "aligned with terrorists," Assad quickly replied: "Definitely."

"You can find it on the Net," Assad went on. "Those terrorists in Syria, holding the machine gun or killing people, they [appear as] peaceful refugees in Europe or in the West."  "You don’t need a significant number to commit atrocities," he noted. He also said that the 9/11 attacks were pulled off by fewer than 20 terrorists, "out of maybe millions of immigrants in the United States. So it’s not about the number, it’s about the quality, it’s about the intentions."

Secret Pentagon Report Reveals US "Created" ISIS As A "Tool" To Overthrow Syria's President Assad – Zero hedge

And if you don’t want to believe Syria’s elected President Assad, there’s this from


Remember Those 'Moderate' Syrian Rebels That The U.S. Armed? ISIS Got Some Of Those Weapons Too

As the Syrian Civil War has waged on over the past few years, the United States, along with Arab states such as Saudi Arabia and Qatar, decided to arm the Syrian rebels under the “Free Syrian Army” umbrella.  The shipments of former Yugoslavian Army weapons held by the Croatians, along with newly manufactured Croatian weapons, began in November 2012, according to The Telegraph UK. The weapons were flown out of Croatia on chartered flights to Jordan and then smuggled into Syria.

Fast forward to the rise of ISIS and their blitzkreig campaign across northern Iraq. An investigation by the arms control organization Conflict Armament Research has found that various U.S. supplied weapons have wound up in the hands of ISIS.  The U.S.-made small arm in question is the M16A4 assault rifle. It is the main service rifle of the U.S. Marine Corps and sees limited use in the U.S. Army. More importantly, thousands of them were supplied to the Iraqi Army. The source of ISIS's M16s, along with other U.S. made weapons, is likely captured Iraqi Army stocks.

As for the M79s, they were part of the arms shipments from Croatia that were meant for the Free Syrian Army. The weapons were either captured, or acquired by former FSA fighters as they joined ISIS.

Forget about what our NATO “allies” think about President Trump’s Executive Order, what do Europeans thinks of Trump’s temporary ban?  From Chatham House:


What Do Europeans Think About Muslim Immigration?

President Donald Trump’s executive order to ban citizens of seven Muslim-majority states from entering the US for 90 days, and temporarily freeze all refugee arrivals (including Syrians indefinitely), has been interpreted widely as an attempt to curtail the inward migration of Muslims, which Trump and his supporters argue pose a threat to national security.

Trump’s policy has generated a backlash among some of Europe’s leaders

Amid these competing views, where do the public in European countries stand on the specific issue of Muslim immigration? There is evidence to suggest that both Trump and these radical right-wing parties reflect an underlying reservoir of public support.

Drawing on a unique, new Chatham House survey of more than 10,000 people from 10 European states, we can throw new light on what people think about migration from mainly Muslim countries. Our results are striking and sobering… 

In our survey, carried out before President Trump’s executive order was announced, respondents were given the following statement: ‘All further migration from mainly Muslim countries should be stopped’. They were then asked to what extent did they agree or disagree with this statement. Overall, across all 10 of the European countries an average of 55% agreed that all further migration from mainly Muslim countries should be stopped, 25% neither agreed nor disagreed and 20% disagreed.

Majorities in all but two of the ten states agreed, ranging from 71% in Poland, 65% in Austria, 53% in Germany and 51% in Italy to 47% in the United Kingdom and 41% in Spain. In no country did the percentage that disagreed surpass 32%.

It is enough that the people know there was an election. The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything. - Joseph Stalin

Therein lies the problem, world leaders including in the United States, do not care what the people want.  The leaders, aided by a universally corrupt media, worry not about re-election for they control the electoral process.  For instance in France where Francois Fillon, member of the conservative Les Republicans political party upended the election with his surprise primary win has been savaged by the media.  Fillon has been the victim of a vicious media campaign to discredit him.  From RussiaToday:


French media brands presidential hopeful Fillon as ‘Putin’s friend’

French presidential hopeful Francois Fillon is “Vladimir Putin’s friend” and intends to “work ardently” with Russia, French media trumpeted after the country was caught unawares by the Republican’s victory in the first round of the center-right primary.  During the first primary on Sunday, Fillon, who served as prime minister in Nicolas Sarkozy’s government from 2007 till 2012, not only beat his former boss, but also came in first ahead of Alain Juppe, the 71-year-old ex-prime minister and mayor of Bordeaux.

Contrary to the current French establishment, Fillon advocates lifting the EU sanctions imposed on Russia for what Brussels (NATO) insists was “undermining of Ukrainian sovereignty” following the 2014 Euromaidan coup in Kiev.

“Vladimir Putin can rejoice. If Francois Fillon enters the Elysee [Palace], he will count a new friend in the circle of Western leaders. Indeed, like Donald Trump, the former French Prime Minister intends to work ardently with Russia,” Le Point wrote on Monday…

 “With the victory of Donald Trump and the possible duel [between] Fillon-Le Pen in the second round of the French presidential election, Vladimir Putin could end up with ‘friends’ in power in two of the major capitals of the West, Washington and Paris,” according to the publication…

The French media’s take on Fillon “is not surprising,” saying that it mainly supports Paris’ alliance with the US and French-German relations. “Yet in reality there is a large part of public opinion in France that not often speak out openly, but know that there can be no balance in Europe without a renewed and consistent alliance with Russia…

The media's the most powerful entity on earth. They have the power to make the innocent guilty and to make the guilty innocent, and that's power. Because they control the minds of the masses. - Malcolm X

As if cordial relations with Russia is a bad thing.  So the French media took it upon themselves to destroy Fillon, serving their elite masters.  From the New York Times:


Fillon Scandal Indicts, Foremost, France’s Political Elite

PARIS — The president of the National Assembly does it. The president of the Senate defends it. Dozens of rank-and-file parliamentarians do it, too. Hiring your spouse, son or sister in France’s Parliament is perfectly legal.

So, with François Fillon, until recently France’s leading presidential candidate, in deep trouble for payments of nearly $1 million from the public payroll to his wife and children, many French politicians are asking: What’s the big deal?  The answer has, belatedly, come roaring back from much of the country’s press and public: They just don’t get it.

“Penelopegate,” a scandal named for Mr. Fillon’s wife, now threatens to sink the ambitions of a man who little more than a week ago seemed all but certain to become France’s next president.

But the scandal has done more than add another volatile element to France’s presidential campaign. It has also tapped a wellspring of anger in the French electorate and called into question the standard operating procedures of the political class… 

The uproar has similarly lifted the hopes of Emmanuel Macron, the former Rothschild banker and economy minister in the Socialist government, who is running an insurgent campaign atop his own newly formed political movement.

But I digress, so let’s get back to the Ninth Circuit court’s decision regarding whether or not President Trump had the legal authority to temporarily ban immigrants that he believes pose a danger to American citizens.  From Breitbart:


Turley: Trump Making Same Arguments as Obama in Defense of Immigration Executive Order

Thursday on MSNBC’s “The 11th Hour,” George Washington University Law School professor Jonathan Turley reacted to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision to uphold a stay by a lower to halt President Donald Trump’s executive order restricting immigration to the United States from seven predominantly Muslim nations.

Although the court ruled in the opponents of the Trump order’s favor, the law still was on Trump’s side and that the Trump administration was using the “virtually the identical arguments” the Obama administration had used in defense of its immigration policy.

“Well, it was a poorly crafted executive order, and it was a terrible rollout,” Turley said. “But I still think that the law favors the administration once you get to the merits. I don’t agree with many of those, some of those cases. But the courts have been highly deferential to the president, and they generally don’t second-guess. I think the people also have to acknowledge that the Trump administration here is making virtually the identical argument to the Obama administration.”

“The Obama administration argued the president’s judgment on administration was largely unreviewable,” he continued. “He argued that he could even refuse or order the failure to enforce immigration laws. But the arguments were very, very similar. And for all the Democrats objecting now, I didn’t hear a peep of objection from them when just last year these arguments were being made by the same Justice Department.”

I think a more pertinent question is not “was Trump’s order legal” but “what hath America wrought?”  The American courts have been corrupted to an unbelievable degree by the George W. Bush Administration.  From the Extreme Supreme Court to the lower and appellate courts, all are corrupt and packed with zealots, both right and left. 

It is not for the Ninth Circuit court to second guess the order but to read the law and interpret it.  Is it any wonder that Americans have lost all confidence in American jurisprudence?  Americans have nothing but contempt for the governing elite, the corrupt media and the courts.

By Patricia Baeten

No comments:

Post a Comment