Paul Manafort, Donald Trump’s ex-campaign manager, has been
indicted for colluding with Russia during the 2016 election. To understand the charges against Paul
Manafort, that incidentally have nothing to do with the Donald Trump campaign,
you must look at the CIA’s overthrow of the elected government of Ukraine.
According to Wikipedia “Viktor Fedorovych Yanukovych is a
Ukrainian politician who was elected as the fourth President of Ukraine on February 7, 2010 in an election that the
Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe called transparent and
honest.”
Well there’s nothing America’s “elected” government hates
more than transparent and honest elections.
We haven’t had one since 1996.
So, Viktor Yanukovych was overthrown in 2014 in a CIA and State
Department color revolution after he rejected a loan from the IMF for a more
favorable deal from Russia.
The Obama Administration was furious and Senators John
McCain, Lindsay Graham as well as Vice President Joe Biden and State
Department’s Victoria Nuland all played prominent roles to overthrow of the
democratically elected Yanukovych and the installation the billionaire
chocolate magnate, Petro Poroshenko as President. From Press TV:
Excerpt:
US ‘involved in criminal activities’ in Ukraine
The Obama administration is “involved in criminal activities” in
Ukraine and facilitated last year’s “coup d'état” in Kiev, a former US
Senate candidate says. “They did so in
conjunction with neo-Nazi elements in Kiev, they did so at the behest of Israel
and the European central banks and the International Monetary Fund (IMF),” said
Mark Dankof, who is also a broadcaster and pastor in San Antonio, Texas.
“And of course this whole situation in Ukraine permitted the United States to continue
the encirclement policy of Russia that has been going on since the end of
the Cold War ,” he told Press TV on Monday...
Dankof cited Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian
Affairs Victoria Nuland who revealed last year that Washington had invested about $5 billion to promote “democracy” in Ukraine.
“The worst aspect of this whole
situation is that this [US] government
continues to be involved in criminal activities in the eastern part of Ukraine,
specifically targeting ethnically Russian people in the major urban
areas of the eastern part of that country for genocidal activity,” he said.
Ties between Washington and Moscow
deteriorated last year after pro-Western forces ousted Ukraine’s President
Viktor Yanukovych in February 2014… The
United States and the European Union have imposed several rounds of sanctions
on Russia, including visa bans and asset freezes. According to US officials, Washington is considering providing
Ukrainian forces with lethal weapons.
Why did the U.S. Government provide lethal weapons to the
Neo-Nazi’s to be for genocide against Russian speaking Ukrainians? How is that promoting democracy? Oh, and that
$5 billion Washington spent “promoting democracy in Ukraine”, was recovered
when Ukraine’s gold was stolen and shipped in the dead of night to the Federal
Reserve Bank in New York. From 21stCentury Wire:
Excerpt:
The Latest Heist: US Quietly Snatches the Ukraine’s Gold Reserves
According to reports out of Kiev
(see links below), the US has quietly
transfers 33 tons of Ukrainian gold out of the country and back to vaults
in the US. Presumably, this sovereign wealth transfer would be counted as partial “collateral” for a fresh
round of IMF, US FED, and ECB paper debt that is currently being organised for
dumping into the Ukraine’s economic black hole.
Multiple inquiries to US Federal
Reserve administrators into the location of the Ukraine’s gold have been met
with the proverbial ‘pass the buck’, making tracking and tracking the final
resting place of these 33 tonnes very difficult indeed – but one can expect
that the NY Fed is probably the
institution who has masterminded this financial heist…
It’s worth pointing out here that when NATO sacked Libya in 2011, one
of the first items that came into question was the gold in Libya’s state-run
central bank. Prior to the NATO takeover of that country, Libya had one of the highest per capita gold reserves in the world,
alongside Lebanon, giving Libya a distinct advantage should it carry out former
Libyan leader Muammar Muhammad al-Gaddafi’s long-term financial transition to a
gold-backed Libyan Dinar. As you can imagine, this is no longer the case in
Tripoli.
Additionally, like Libya, both Syria and Iran are two of the
world’s last remaining nation states who both have state-run central banks
and gold reserves which fall outside of the world’s private
central banking syndicate.
The price of a Washington brutally forced “democracy” is
paid in gold. But I digress, so let’s
get back to the indictments against Paul Manafort. Mueller’s indictments which can be read here,
seem to be some thin gruel. According to
Fortune, Paul Manafort offered private briefings about the Trump campaign to a
Russian Billionaire close to Putin. Hmmm, here’s the official story:
Excerpt:
Paul Manafort Offered 'Private Briefings' About Trump Campaign to
Russian Billionaire
In the middle of Donald Trump’s
presidential run, then-campaign chairman Paul Manafort said he was willing to
provide “private briefings” about the campaign to a Russian billionaire the U.S. government considers close to
Russian President Vladimir Putin…
Manafort spokesman Jason Maloni
confirmed to The Associated Press that the email exchanges were legitimate but
said no briefings ever occurred. The
email involved an offer for Oleg
Deripaska, a wealthy Russian who made his money in the aluminum business. The July 7, 2016, email came a little over a week before the Republican
National Convention, while Manafort was leading the Trump campaign’s
day-to-day operations.
The Manafort email exchange
regarding Deripaska is one of thousands of pages of material turned over to
congressional committees by the Trump campaign… The email is the first to
indicate that Manafort was attempting to reach Deripaska while he was
working on the Trump campaign…
The Associated Press reported in March that before signing with
Trump’s campaign, Manafort secretly worked for Deripaska and proposed
plans… that he said could “greatly benefit the Putin Government…” Deripaska sued the AP for defamation over
the story in May in U.S. District Court in Washington, alleging the story was
inaccurate and hurt his career by falsely accusing him of criminal activity.
Hmmm, seems like a lot of bullshit and suppositions
regarding the relationship between Paul Manafort and this Deripaska guy. This part seems really goofy “before signing
with Trump’s campaign, Manafort secretly worked for Deripaska and
proposed plans”… that he said could “greatly benefit the Putin Government…” Really??
That just seems so crazy, so what is the story behind the Deripaska
guy? From The Telegraph:
Excerpt:
Vladimir Putin takes Oleg Deripaska to task
Vladimir Putin, the Russian prime
minister, publicly criticised his most faithful oligarch on Thursday in an
attempt to deflect growing social discontent on to the country’s unpopular
super-rich.
Mr Putin, who is a master at dispensing ritual humiliation, likened Oleg Deripaska to a cockroach and forced
him to accompany him on a tour of Pikalevo, a factory town that has
witnessed the most serious social unrest Russia has seen since the start of the
global economic crisis.
Last week Pikalevo’s residents vented their anger over job losses and unpaid wages at one of the oligarch’s local factories by
blocking a major road and causing a 250-mile traffic jam… The prime minister rounded on the hapless
tycoon as they toured a cement plant…
He then ordered the tycoon to pay all outstanding wages – £830,000 –
before the day was out. Mr Deripaska was Russia’s richest man until last
year. He has suffered a dramatic reversal of fortune as mounting debt has seen
his assets shrink from £17?billion to about £2?billion today.
Analysts believe the Kremlin has saved him from bankruptcy —
partly as a reward for his unquestioning loyalty and also to prevent his assets falling into the hands of Western banks…
Mr Deripaska’s factory is among
three upon which the town depends for survival. Mr Putin has floated the idea of renationalising the factories,
which were privatised after the fall of the Soviet Union.
Mr Deripaska is an unloved figure in Russia. He was among a number
of men who built their fortunes during the chaos of the 1990s. He faces a June 11 deadline to restructure billions of dollars in
debt owed to international banks.
Hmmm, Deripaska was billions of dollars in debt to
international banks in 2009 when Putin made him pay his workers their back
wages and then bailed him out. Putin did
so because it was in Russia’s best interests not to have foreign banks owning a
Russian factory. Now in 2017 Deripaska
is suddenly worth 6 billion and he is key to proving Russia collusion charges
against Trump?
Through marriage Deripaska was related to the Deep State’s
Russian puppet Yeltsin, maybe there’s a correlation. From Global Research:
Excerpt:
US Meddling in 1996 Russian Elections in Support of Boris Yeltsin
Americans are outraged by
allegations that Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an intelligence
service to hack email accounts of the Democratic National Committee… But does
the USA meddle in the presidential elections of other countries? The answer to the first question, of course,
is a resounding Yes…
Let us limit our discussion to one
single case. Readers will recall that in
the run-up to the 1996 presidential election in Russia, opinion polls put the pro-western incumbent, Boris Yeltsin, in
fifth place among the presidential candidates, with only 8% support. The same polls showed that the most popular
candidate in Russia by a wide margin was the Communist Party’s Gennady
Zyuganov.
Moved to desperation by the
numbers, well-connected Russian
oligarchs suggested just cancelling the election and supporting a military
takeover, rather than facing a defeat at the polls. Neocons
in the West embraced the idea–all in the name of Democracy, of course. In the end, though, Yeltsin and the oligarchs
decided to retain power by staging the election.
In keeping with Russian laws at the
time, Zyuganov spent less than three million dollars on his campaign. Estimates of Yeltsin’s spending, by contrast, range from $700 million to $2.5
billion… In February 1996, at the
urging of the United States, the
International Monetary Fund… supplied a $10.2 billion “emergency infusion”
to Russia. The money disappeared as
Yeltsin used it to shore up his reputation and to buy votes. He forced the Central Bank of Russia to
provide an additional $1 billion for his campaign, too. Meanwhile, a handful of Russian oligarchs,
notably several big contributors
residing in Israel, provided more billions for the Yeltsin campaign.
In the spring of 1996, Yeltsin and
his campaign manager, billionaire privatizer Anatoly Chubais, recruited a
team of financial and media oligarchs to bankroll the Yeltsin campaign
and guarantee favorable media coverage on national television and in leading
newspapers. In return, Chubais allowed
well-connected Russian business leaders to acquire majority stakes in some of
Russia’s most valuable state-owned assets.
Campaign strategists for the former Republican governor of California Pete
Wilson covertly made their way to the President Hotel in Moscow where, behind a
guard and locked doors, they served as Yeltsin’s “secret campaign weapon” to
save Russia for Democracy...
It is now public record that the Yeltsin campaign conducted extensive
“black operations,” including disrupting opposition rallies and press
conferences, spreading disinformation among Yeltsin supporters, and denying
media access to the opposition. Finally,
widespread bribery, voter fraud,
intimidation, and ballot stuffing assured Yeltsin’s victory in the runoff
election…
During Yeltsin’s second term, the
“non-ideological” IMF provided another
infusion of money, this time $40 billion. Once again, more billions disappeared without
a trace, much of it stolen by the President’s
chronies, who placed it in foreign banks…
Under Yeltsin’s tenure, the death rate in Russia reached wartime
levels. Accidents, food poisoning,
exposure, heart attacks, lack of access to basic healthcare, and an epidemic of
suicides—they all played a role… “Western
and Russian demographers now agree that between 1992 and 2000, the number of
‘surplus deaths’ in Russia–deaths that cannot be explained on the basis of
previous trends–was between five and six
million persons…”
By the time he left office, the American-approved President of the
Russian Federation had an approval
rating of 2%. But by that time it
didn’t matter: the kleptocrats were
safely installed in power, and American-imposed Democracy had achieved its aims
in Russia’s “transition.”
That’s right, by the time Yeltsin left office “it didn’t
matter because the kleptocrats like Oleg Deripaska were safely installed in
power.” And now Deripaska is the main
link between Putin and the Trump Campaign.
Paul Manafort is just a scapegoat.
Manafort has been indicted for interfering with the CIA’s overthrow of
the elected government of Ukraine.
This kangaroo court that will hear the charges against Paul
Manafort will be chosen very selectively.
If the Manafort case breaks wide open it will be the CIA, MI6 and the
neocons and their minions in Washington who have the most to lose. I don’t know about you, but I’m making popcorn
and pulling up a chair. This should be
interesting.
By Patricia Baeten
No comments:
Post a Comment