In his Farewell Address, President Washington warned against a
“passionate attachment” to any foreign nation that might create the illusion of
some “common interest … where no common interest exists.”
Now that Mueller’s baseless witch hunt to tie the election
of President Donald Trump to “Russian collusion” is completed, we see the major
charges brought against onetime campaign manager Paul Manafort stem from
failing to register as a foreign agent under the FARA laws. How sad and actually laughable that Mueller
had to stoop to the depths of partisanship to fabricate this so called “crime”
that takes place on a daily basis in Washington.
AIPAC is an unregistered foreign agent that has complete
control over the incumbents in our government as they buy seats in our
government to promote the neocon Zionist agenda of Israel’s most corrupt leader,
Benjamin Netanyahu at the expense of the American people. These neocons think America’s treasury is
their mad money to be spent without restraint to spread hatred, death and destruction
across the globe in the name of “spreading American freedom and values”.
What Americans don’t realize is that to their “elected” officials
answer to these agents of Zion. Under
this un-American system “freedom is just another word for nothing left to
lose.” The only freedoms they have to
offer the American people are freedoms no one in their right mind would want. These are some of the freedoms that they are
forcing on the American people.
·
The freedom to be maimed or to lose your life in
a war of aggression against a weak nation who is no threat to America, to kill
or remove their leader and steal their resources. Once our military families have been are
wounded or killed they no longer have any value to the agents of Zion and are
tossed aside like garbage.
·
The freedom to have every phone call, e-mail,
purchase and web search monitored by unknown individuals to see if anything you
say can be construed as anti-Semite.
Anyone who writes, speaks or expresses displeasure with the direction
that these merchants of death are taking America is declared a traitor charged
with espionage and/or imprisoned.
·
Freedom to pursue a higher education just to
become an indentured slave to the Wall Street Vultures whose banks who sell
these government backed education loan securities at premium prices since the forced
repayment of the loans carries all the weight of the United States
Government. In other words, the
government serves the Zionist banking interests not that of the American people
who can be pursued even after death to repay these loan sharks their blood
money.
·
The freedom for the Zionist neocons to traverse
the globe spreading death, destruction and evil at the tip of the sword of the
U.S. military unimpeded of restraints by the American government or
international law.
These are just a few of the examples of freedom meaning nothing
left to lose. America is at a precipice,
this is the war of the century. Will
America’s dinosaurs in congress whose fealty to Zionist special interests has
put America at the risk of extinction, win yet again? These agents of Zion have bankrupted America,
destroyed our armed forces, destroyed our educational system, destroyed
America’s infrastructure, destroyed the pillars of capitalism and plunged
Americans into an abyss of debt, drug addiction, homelessness and helplessness
not seen since the Great Depression.
While these foreign agents have always been around the
periphery of American governance since the era of FDR, their firm grasp on the
American government wasn’t complete until the overthrow of the American
government on December 12, 2000. The 2000
election was unique in that the Zionist agents in the American government had
seized majorities in both the Republican and Democratic Parties that were
willing to overthrow their own country’s government and turn it over to foreign
agents.
The Iraq war would not have been possible without complete
control over both corrupt parties.
Looking back we can see how nothing has changed since the bicameral
coup. From Mint Press:
Excerpt:
16 Years After Iraq, the US Has Become a Nation of Passive Neocons
After
Iraq, the neocons began waging another war, one for America’s soul.
WASHINGTON (Opinion) — Sixteen
years have passed and the memory of the
Iraq War is distant for many, save for the millions of people — Iraqi and
American alike — who saw their lives destroyed by one of the greatest lies ever
sold to the American public.
Yet, while plenty of Americans
sleep easy thinking that such an atrocity as the invasion and occupation of
Iraq could never happen again, the U.S.
government has continuously been involved in many smaller, equally disastrous
wars — both seen and unseen — largely
thanks to the fact that those who brought us the Iraq War remain both respected
and still present in the halls of power…
Indeed, the only thing the domestic
outrage over the Iraq War seemed to accomplish has been a massive effort waged by the government and the corporate elite to
engineer a public that doesn’t
complain and doesn’t care when their government meddles or invades another
country…
Our forgetfulness has informed our
silence and our silence is our complicity in the crimes — past and present
— orchestrated by the neocons, who never
left government after Iraq but instead rebranded themselves and helped to
culturally engineer our passivity. As a consequence, we have again been
hoodwinked by the neocons, who have transformed America in their image, creating
a nation of neocon enablers, a nation of passive neocons.
Iraq War lies revisited
Though the lies that led the U.S.
to invade Iraq are well-documented, they deserve to be remembered… Yet arguably more important than the lies
told in the direct lead-up to the war, is the conclusive evidence that key officials in the Bush administration,
many of them members of the neoconservative organization known as the Project
for a New American Century (PNAC), had planned and called for an invasion of
Iraq long before the September 11th attacks had even taken place…
Some researchers say the plan for
the Iraq War began decades before with the drafting of the 1992 Defense Policy Guidance (DPG), which was overseen by Paul
Wolfowitz, then Under-Secretary of Defense for Policy, who would later become
one of the chief architects of the 2003 Iraq War…
PNAC is arguably best known for
publishing the document “Rebuilding America’s Defenses” in September 2000. That
document, which cites the DPG as its inspiration, contains many controversial passages, one of which reads:
The United States has for decades
sought to play a more permanent role in Gulf regional security. While the
unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate justification, the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends
the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein.”
After George W. Bush was
declared the winner of the 2000 election, many PNAC signatories took
prominent positions in his administration, including Cheney and Rumsfeld.
Other PNAC signatories — including Dov Zakheim, John Bolton, and Elliott Abrams — would also soon find their way
into the Bush administration, where they too would become intimately involved
in planning and executing the Iraq War. Notably, Bush’s brother Jeb Bush was
also a PNAC signatory.
Once the Bush administration took office, planning for the invasion of
Iraq quickly moved ahead, with Saddam’s removal the priority topic during
Bush’s inaugural national-security meeting. Former Treasury Secretary Paul
O’Neill later recalled that the meeting “was all about finding a way to do it.
The president saying, ‘Go find me a way to do this.’”
Just two weeks later, Vice President Dick Cheney — former
Halliburton CEO — took the helm of a newly formed energy task force that began secretly meeting with top oil
executives. In a matter of weeks, by March 2001, the Pentagon produced a document called “Foreign Suitors for Iraqi
Oilfield Contracts” for Cheney’s taskforce, which included potential
areas of Iraq primed for exploratory drilling. Notably, other top Bush
officials, such as Condoleezza Rice, were, like Cheney, former petroleum
industry executives…
On September 19, 2001, the
Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board, chaired by Richard Perle — another PNAC member
— declared that Iraq must be invaded
after Afghanistan. The next day, PNAC, in a letter to Bush, wrote:
Even if evidence does not link Iraq directly to the attack, any
strategy aiming at the eradication of terrorism and its sponsors must include a
determined effort to remove Saddam Hussein from power.” It was not until December 2001 that the administration, led by Cheney, had begun to claim that Saddam was
linked to Al Qaeda…
As the public outrage over the lies
and years-old schemes that led to the Iraq war mounted, it was not the exposure of their crimes that riled neoconservatives.
Instead, their concern was over the lingering public outrage that severely
limited the U.S.’ ability to intervene militarily abroad, leading them to
develop more covert operations and other “regime-change” methods aside from
outright military intervention…
In addition to the rise of more
covert “regime-change” operations after Iraq, a concerted effort began that aimed to whitewash neoconservatives,
particularly the prominent neocons who had been the architects of the Iraq War.
These neocons began to rebrand themselves, dumping the now-tainted PNAC in
favor of the Foreign Policy Initiative and several other prominent think-tanks
that obfuscate their past. Their
rebranding has been so successful that PNAC co-founders like Bill Kristol
are now considered a part of the Democratic-led “Resistance” to President
Donlad (sic) Trump.
By 2008, the neocons made it clear
that rebranding their ideology was the plan, with PNAC co-founder Robert Kagan penning the article “Neocon Nation,” in
which, in an effort to whitewash the ideology’s bloodsoaked legacy, he
claimed that neoconservatism is “deeply rooted in American history and widely
shared by Americans.”
Of course, Kagan’s claim was ironic
given that he once criticized Colin Powell for not believing that “the United
States should enter conflicts without strong public support,” revealing Kagan’s own disdain for the opinion of the American public. However, his
2008 article shows how, after Iraq, the neocons began waging another war, one
for America’s soul.
Obama and “The World the Kagans Made”
After Barack Obama won the 2008
presidential election, many Americans
felt that the days of “wars for oil” and wars built on lies would end,
particularly after then-President-elect Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize for
his warm rhetoric about the need for world peace. Sadly, to this day, many who
viscerally opposed the Bush administration’s Iraq War either fail or refuse to
acknowledge that Obama was every bit as murderous as his predecessor…
While neoconservatives,
particularly those who brought us the Iraq War under Bush, are often associated
with the Republican Party, the Obama
administration — particularly the Hillary Clinton-led State Department — was
plugged directly into the same network of neoconservative actors responsible
for the destruction of Iraq.
Indeed, upon becoming secretary of
state, Clinton quickly appointed Robert
Kagan to her 25-member Foreign Affairs Policy Board, a position he continued to
hold after John Kerry took over the State Department…
Kagan, one of the most influential
and prominent neocons of all, served as a State Department official in the
Reagan administration and later went on to co-found PNAC in 1997. As early as 1998, Kagan was calling for the
U.S. government to “remove Mr. Hussein and his regime from power…”
However, Kagan’s troubling track record didn’t stop the Obama administration
from giving both Kagan and his wife considerable influence over government
policy. In 2011, the Obama administration brought on Kagan’s wife, Victoria
Nuland, to serve as State Department spokesperson.
Nuland was subsequently given
the post of Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs in
2013, which she used to engineer the
2014 “regime change” coup in Ukraine — an event that continues to have
deadly consequences in that country and has even helped bolster Neo-Nazi elements in the United States.
Nuland is a textbook example of the continuity of the neocons from the
Bush administration to the Obama administration…
Trump: “Against” the Iraq War But
Willingly Surrounded By Iraq War Criminals
Though Donald Trump blasted the
Iraq War, and the Bush administration’s role in creating it, on the campaign
trail, he — like Obama before him — has invited neocons into his administration
since its inception. Trump’s first
secretary of defense, Jim “Mad Dog” Mattis, as well as his first national
security advisor, H.R. McMaster, were close to Iraq War architect and influential neocon Paul Wolfowitz — so much
so that Wolfowitz was covertly guiding their policy through email
correspondence in the early days of the Trump administration.
Mattis’ nomination by Trump was
particularly strange given the latter’s frequent criticism of the Iraq War,
where Mattis earned his nickname “Mad
Dog” after overseeing the 2004 sieges of Fallujah, in which the U.S. military
illegally used white phosphorus, a chemical weapon, as well as depleted uranium
in the densely populated Iraqi city. As a consequence of the U.S.’ attack
over a decade ago, FALLUJAH’S CHILDREN
CONTINUE TO BE BORN WITH HORRIFIC BIRTH DEFECTS.
While Mattis and McMaster have
since departed, the neocons are more
powerful than ever in the Trump administration, as seen in the appointment of
another PNAC signatory, John Bolton, to the role of national security advisor. In
addition, PNAC signatory, Elliot Abrams, was recently named special
representative for Venezuela, despite his role in the Iran-Contra affair and
in arming Latin American death squads that slaughtered thousands of civilians,
and also despite the fact that Abrams is a convicted felon.
A Nation of Enablers
Though they have done their best to
hide it, the United States has become a nation governed by and for the
neoconservatives and their various corporate clients. The outrage
voiced over their crimes in Iraq — to them — was not a call for change but
merely an indicator that such outrage must be reduced and silenced, a task
since accomplished through cultural engineering and, more recently, censorship.
Since the Iraq War, neocons and
their allies have used every tool at their disposal to mold us in their image,
creating an uncaring nation that feels little or no empathy for the millions
murdered and maimed in their name; a
nation that is not repulsed by the fact that many of its top public officials
are convicted war criminals; a nation that worships war and death and mocks
anti-war voices…
With millions set to die in Yemen from a man-made famine supported by
the U.S. and a war being planned for Venezuela, a country that is twice the
size of Iraq, our silence and noninterest in these matters is our complicity.
How many millions must neocons and their ilk murder before we say
enough is enough? The “War on Terror” alone has already taken an estimated
8 million lives. How many nations will we allow its architects to destroy? We
have already laid waste to Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Iraq, and Somalia;
engineered the war in South Sudan; supported the war in Yemen and the
destruction of Palestine. Would Venezuela be the “last straw” that
finally rouses us to action? It seems unlikely…
The neocons are still in power and still the public face of American
policy only because we allow it. That simple fact means that they will
remain in power until we say we have had enough. How many years after the Iraq
War will it be before that moment finally arrives?.
Where are the charges against these war criminals for being
unregistered agents of a foreign country?
If there is any question whether or not these neocon Zionists promote
Netanyahu’s agenda over the interests of the American people than let me dispel
them. Make no mistake America’s government
serves Netanyahu first and foremost above all else. From Times of Israel:
Excerpts:
Pompeo accepted almost all Netanyahu’s requests, senior Israeli
official says
PM said to exit meeting feeling he
has influence over US policy; countries cooperating on Syria withdrawal; lone
issue yet to be worked out is Israeli jets deal with Croatia
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had almost all of his requests
accepted during his meeting in Brazil with US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo,
a senior Israeli diplomatic official said Wednesday. Netanyahu met Pompeo in the capital Brasilia,
where the Israeli premier was on an official visit, and both men later
attended the inauguration of Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro.
Pompeo
assured Netanyahu during the meeting that the planned withdrawal of US ground
forces from Syria will not alter Washington’s commitment to countering
Iranian aggression and maintaining Israel’s security. Netanyahu left the meeting feeling that
Israel has influence over US policy in certain areas, the Israeli official
told reporters Wednesday, adding that Israel
and the United States were working on “various ideas regarding Syria that will
help Israel…”
Israeli officials are concerned that the planned withdrawal of the
2,000 US military personnel from Syria will create a military vacuum
enabling Iran to increase its foothold in the country, where it is supporting
the Syrian regime in ending the country’s civil war… “Israel received almost everything it wanted”
during the Tuesday meeting in Brasilia, the official said. “Israel had 8
requests — 7 of which were accepted.”
The lone issue still to be worked
out between the parties, according to the official, is Israel’s sale of aging F-16 fighter jets to Croatia. Quoting unnamed Israeli officials,
Channel 10 news reported last month the Trump administration was angry
Israel added advanced Israeli-made electronic systems to the F-16s as part
of efforts to convince Croatia to buy the planes.
The officials told the network the US believes Israel unfairly
profited through its actions, as the F-16s are American-made and were not
supposed to be sold to a third party without its approval.
US President Donald Trump had stunned allies — and prompted the
resignation of his respected defense secretary, Jim Mattis — by abruptly announcing on December 19 that the Islamic State
jihadists were defeated and that US troops in Syria were ready to leave.
A senior Israeli official said
Monday that Netanyahu has asked Trump to stagger the US withdrawal over
a lengthy period of time, rather than carry out an immediate pullout. The New York Times then reported that Trump has agreed to allow the US military
to gradually pull troops out of Syria over a period of about four months,
rather than the rapid withdrawal he had initially indicated when announcing the
measure…
It’s pretty evident who is pulling Pompeo’s strings and it’s
not the President of the United States. But
Pompeo’s allegiance to Netanyahu is only outdone by that of National Security
Advisor John Bolton. Stymied by the
bogus Mueller anal probe, President Trump fell into the Zionist trap when he
named some of the most virulent anti-American Zionists to head up his foreign
policy.
The very people who were part and parcel to the Russia-gate
hoax that has hamstrung Trump’s “America First” policy now advance the
anti-American Zionist agenda. From MintPress:
Excerpt:
Bolton’s Past Advocacy for Israel at US Expense Heralds Dangerous New
Era in Geopolitics
WASHINGTON – Last Thursday,
President Trump announced that former UN
ambassador John Bolton, once called the “most dangerous man” in the entire
George W. Bush administration, would replace H.R. McMaster as national
security adviser, making him the man in
charge of what the President sees and hears regarding issues of national
security. Bolton will officially take over McMaster’s post on April 9.
The appointment was not surprising.
Indeed, earlier this month, MintPress reported that McMaster was soon to be
replaced – largely at the behest of billionaire Republican donor and militant Zionist
Sheldon Adelson – and that Bolton was a top contender for that
position, largely due to Bolton’s reputation as a “stalwart friend of
Israel” and his frequent calls for military action against Iran, Israel’s
regional arch-rival.
Yet, Bolton’s appointment – placed in the greater context of recent
changes to Trump’s cabinet – is a
harrowing portent for those opposed to more U.S. regime-change wars. Mike
Pompeo, another proponent of war with Iran, is set to take over the State
Department; and Gina Haspel — whose nickname “Bloody Gina” speaks to her
history of overseeing torture and depreciating human life — is slated to take
over for Pompeo as head of the CIA…
Though he is just one of the war
hawks now roosting in the Trump administration, Bolton is arguably more
dangerous than all the rest due to his bellicose rhetoric, unilateral
decision-making, and his “kiss up, kick down” style of interaction with
superiors and colleagues, allowing him to be remarkably effective in getting
his way…
Bolton has already exercised great
influence over the president, reportedly
adding statements to Trump’s speech at the United Nations without the knowledge
of Trump’s staff. Thus, Bolton is
set to have a disproportionately influential role in the Trump administration,
making it essential to examine what his appointment will likely mean for U.S.
government policy, particularly regarding geopolitical “hotspots” such as the
Middle East and the Koreas.
Though the domestic reaction to Bolton’s
appointment was rather mixed, top
ministers of the right-wing Israeli government lavished praise upon the
soon-to-be National Security Adviser, calling him “one of the most
outstanding” allies to Israel in U.S. politics, and a “true friend” to the
Jewish state who brings “great experience and original thinking” to “the most
sympathetic administration toward Israel of all time.”
Indeed, Bolton’s ties to Israel are
as deep as they are long-standing — so deep that some have posited that HIS
COMMITMENT TO EXTREME ZIONISM HAS LED HIM TO BETRAY THE NATIONAL INTEREST OF
HIS OWN COUNTRY ON MORE THAN ONE OCCASION.
For instance, Danny Gillerman, the
former Israeli ambassador to the UN, recently noted that Bolton, when serving in the Bush administration, was prone TO “DIRECT FIRE ON HIS OWN FORCES,” — I.E., THE U.S. GOVERNMENT — in order to advance the goals of the
Israeli government…
In addition, Bolton garnered a
reputation – as well as the ire of State Department officials at the time – for violating State Department protocol by
acting unilaterally in matters of diplomacy to negotiate privately in Israel.
The New York Times reported in 2005 that Bolton
traveled to Israel without the required State Department clearance in 2003 and
2004 in a direct effort to undermine then-Secretary of State Colin Powell.
As journalist Gareth Porter noted:
[A]t the very moment that Powell
was saying administration policy was not to attack Iran, Bolton was working with the Israelis to lay the groundwork for just
such a war.” Bolton’s numerous private and unannounced visits to Israel entailed meetings with officials of Mossad,
Israel’s intelligence service, including Meir Dagan, then Mossad’s
director. Despite his flagrant
violations of government rules, Bolton
remained the main liaison between the U.S. and Israeli governments under Bush.
Bolton has pressured Israeli officials to attack Iran even when calling for such an attack was
not the U.S. government’s position. According to Shaul Mofaz,
former Israeli defense minister, Bolton “tried to convince me that Israel needs
to attack Iran,” which Mofaz recently asserted was not “a smart move – not on the part of the Americans today or
anyone else until the threat is real…”
Bolton has also praised President
Trump’s recent decision to recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, and
relocate the U.S. embassy in Israel accordingly – a policy change allegedly orchestrated by pro-Israel Republican
mega-donor Sheldon Adelson — as an “injection of reality.”
In addition, he has strongly promoted the construction of illegal
settlements on Palestinian land, stating recently that Israelis “ought to
be able to build houses wherever they want to, including all of the lands of
Judea and Samaria [Palestine’s West Bank].”
"At every turn, Zionist
Neocon (aka ZioCon) John Bolton has
shilled for Israel - NO MATTER THE COST OR CONSEQUENCE TO THE SAFETY OF THE
AMERICAN PEOPLE."
Given his embrace of extremist Zionism, it is no surprise that Bolton
has found himself replacing H.R. McMaster, whose ouster was orchestrated by
billionaire Republican donor Sheldon Adelson…
Adelson’s push to have Bolton
installed comes at a crucial time, as Israel is currently preparing for war on
“three fronts” — Palestine, Lebanon, and Syria – and is actively lobbying for
American aid and involvement in launching that war. With Bolton in the Trump
administration, along with numerous other staunch Israel allies in key
government positions, Israel will likely
get that aid in addition to AMERICAN TROOPS FIGHTING ALONGSIDE THEM, even if
Israel is the aggressor in the imminent conflict.
The timing of Bolton’s appointment
as National Security Adviser is also noteworthy, as it comes little over a
month before the U.S. embassy is set to move to Jerusalem, when tensions
between Israel, Palestine and its neighbors will be at their highest and when a
war is most likely to break out. Bolton is set to ensure strong U.S. support for any Israeli military action that takes
place during this time, even though
Israel is explicitly planning to target civilians and civilian infrastructure.
With these criminal neocons ignoring America’s elected
president and following orders directly from Netanyahu all hell is being
unleashed on the world’s most vulnerable nations. From Strategic Culture:
Excerpt:
Trump’s CIA Now Unbound and Back to Its Traditional Hijinks
Under the directorship of torture and black site maven Gina Haspel,
Donald Trump’s Central Intelligence Agency has returned to its traditional
roots of conducting “black bag” operations and disrupting electrical grids through
cyber-attacks.
The Venezuelan government has
accused the Trump administration of giving the green light for a series of
crippling power failures in Venezuela, which affected 22 of Venezuela’s 23
states, including the capital of Caracas. The
long-duration power failures were cited by US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo as
a reason for the US withdrawing its diplomats from Caracas.
Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro
announced that an international commission assisted by specialists from Russia,
China, Iran, and the United Nations would help his country analyze the sources
of the Venezuelan electrical grid cyber-attack. Initial cyber-forensics by Venezuela traced some of the cyber warfare
being waged against Venezuela to nodes in Houston and Chicago. In addition to electricity, water service was disrupted in Venezuela…
Hybrid warfare against Venezuela, which includes economic, diplomatic,
and cyber, has the backing of the neo-conservatives who now call the shots
for the Trump White House. They include, in addition to Pompeo,
national security adviser John Bolton; Iran-Contra felon Elliott Abrams,
Trump’s special envoy to the US-backed opposition-led rump Venezuelan
government of Juan Guaido; Cuban-American Mauricio Claver-Carone, the senior
director for Western Hemisphere affairs at the National Security Council; and
Florida Republican Senator Marco Rubio, a Cuban-American, who represents the
interests of South Florida’s right-wing oligarch exiles from Venezuela and
other Latin American countries.
While Trump was preparing for his Hanoi summit meeting with North
Korean leader Kim Jong Un, Trump’s second summit with Kim, Haspel’s CIA dug into its old bag of black operations, while also
engaging in the more modern form of cyber-attack in targeting North Korea.
On February 22, 2019, ten males, all wearing masks, broke into the
North Korean embassy, which is located in the residential suburb of
Aravaca, north of Madrid, Spain, and
subjected eight embassy staff members to brutal interrogation tactics,
including tying up the diplomats, throwing black bags over their heads (a
specialty of Ms. Haspel), and subjecting them to beatings.
One female diplomat managed to
escape through a second-floor window and her screams alerted a neighbor, who
promptly called the police. Two embassy
employees required medical attention from their injuries.
The Spanish police and
National Intelligence Center (CNI) linked two of the embassy invaders to the
CIA. “El Pais,” a Spanish national newspaper, reported that the CIA
issued one of its standard “denials,” however, the paper stated that Spanish
authorities found the denial from Langley, Virginia to be “unconvincing.” “El Pais” reported that the invasion
of the North Korean embassy by the CIA had severely harmed relations between
Madrid and Washington.
The National Police Corps’ General Commissariat of Information (CGI)
and CNI concluded that the attack and occupation of the North Korean
embassy was not carried out by common criminals but was the work of a “military cell” that stole mobile phones and
computers.
Two of the embassy invaders were
identified as Koreans and, based on CGI’s and CNI’s analysis of security camera
video footage, they were further
recognized as Koreans linked to the CIA... The embassy invaders escaped
from the embassy using two North Korean luxury sedans bearing diplomatic
plates. The cars were later found abandoned.
The criminal inquiry into the
incident is now before the Spanish High
Court, the Audiencia Nacional, which could order the arrests of the embassy
attackers and, if they are in the United States or South Korea, have
Spain’s INTERPOL national bureau put out a Red Notice for their arrest and
extradition to Spain to stand trial.
Spanish authorities believe the
CIA’s embassy attackers were looking for information on Kim Hyok Chol, the
former North Korean ambassador to Spain, who was declared “persona non
grata” by the Spanish government in 2017. Kim Hyok Chol, a career diplomat from
one of North Korea’s elite families who studied French at the Pyongyang
University of Foreign Studies and speaks
fluent English, is now one of Kim Jong Un’s trusted diplomatic advisers on
nuclear talks with the Trump administration and he traveled with Chairman Kim
to the failed Hanoi summit with Trump.
With certainty, Kim Hyok Chol thoroughly briefed Kim Jong Un on the
CIA’s storming of his old diplomatic post in Spain. When Trump and Chairman
Kim met in Hanoi on February 27 and if the issue of the CIA’s siege of the
North Korean embassy was brought up, that could have been enough to derail the
summit.
Considering the fact that war
hawks like Bolton, Abrams, and Pompeo are now calling the foreign policy shots
for the Trump administration,
the attack on the North Korean
embassy in Madrid, just five days prior to the Hanoi summit, may have been ordered by Washington’s
neo-con cell with the intention of scuttling the second meeting between Trump
and Kim and put on ice any future meetings.
There is further evidence that suggests the neo-cons, in cahoots with
Haspel at the CIA, set out to disrupt the Hanoi summit. While Trump was
meeting with Kim in Vietnam, the CIA is believed to have launched a
cyber-attack on the Korean American National Coordinating Council (KANCC) in
New York, an organization with ties to the Pyongyang government…
The Trump-Kim Hanoi summit was reported to have hit a roadblock over
North Korea’s request for a partial lifting of US sanctions on North Korea,
in return for the continued North Korean moratorium on nuclear testing and a
partial freeze on production of fissile material.
With the CIA’s attack on the North Korean embassy in Spain still fresh
in the minds of the North Korean side and the
neo-cons’ insistence, pushed by Bolton and Pompeo, for complete North Korean
nuclear disarmament, the Hanoi summit was destined for failure. And, with Bolton, Abrams, Pompeo, and
other dangerous neo-cons in charge at the White House and the State Department
-- and Haspel dancing to their tune at the CIA - North Korea and Venezuela are
not the only countries currently in the gunsights of the Trump administration.
The latest Bolton/Pompeo Zionist adventure has been the
vicious plot to overthrow the elected Bolivarian government of President
Nicolas Maduro of Venezuela and install a CIA agent as their president. While America’s media, intelligence
apparatus, military industrial complex and treasury have been taken over by
these neocon Zionists, retired intelligence and military officials are calling
on the Military to resist the illegal orders of these foreign agents. From Information Clearinghouse:
Excerpt:
Veterans Call on U.S. Troops to Resist Illegal Orders to Invade
Venezuela
March 19, 2019 "Information
Clearing House" - Veterans For
Peace (VFP) calls on all members of the U.S. military to refuse illegal orders
to intervene in Venezuela. Furthermore, VFP urges all U.S. military leaders
to inform the president that they will order their units to stand down from
preparations to invade Venezuela.
President Donald Trump has called on Venezuelan soldiers to disobey
orders and join coup perpetrators headed by U.S.-backed opposition leader, Juan
Guaidó. If they do not do this,
President Trump threatened: “You will find no safe harbor, no easy exit and no
way out. You will lose everything.”
Veterans For Peace President,
Gerry Condon states, “While President Trump speaks of supporting democracy in
Venezuela and Latin America, the real
purpose of the U.S. assault on the Venezuelan government is to fully open the
vast Venezuelan oil reserves to U.S. and other Western oil corporations as well
as to destroy progressive governments in Latin America that put their own
peoples’ needs above the profits of foreign corporations.”
Illegal, immoral and irresponsible U.S. actions, including
"sanctions" (economic war) have already taken a great toll on the
people Venezuela. Nonetheless, the
vast majority of Venezuelan people and military are standing firm against
foreign intervention.
There is a very real possibility
that President Trump will order U.S. troops to intervene in Venezuela, whether
through a direct invasion and occupation, or through support for irregular
counter-revolutionary forces. This would
likely lead to a widening war that could spread to other Latin American
countries and the Caribbean, bringing increasing suffering to the peoples of
Latin America and the U.S.
It is illegal under both U.S.
and international law to launch a military attack against another nation unless
it is clearly in self-defense, and is approved by the United
Nations…
These neocons have no interest in following international
laws, after all they have already managed not only to get away with murder on a
genocidal scale but have never left the halls of power. Venezuela is their most recent botched,
stupid attempt at regime change. In a
recent interview Comrade Elliot Abrams posited a brain twister to justify the
U.S. declaring a CIA operative Juan Guaido as interim president of Venezuela.
From Caitlin Johnstone at Lew Rockwell:
Excerpt:
America’s Venezuela Strategy: Coup By Sheer Narrative Control
The Trump administration is working to overthrow the government of
Venezuela. They are not at this time doing this by military invasion, nor
by funneling thousands of armed militants into the country, nor even solely
with starvation sanctions and CIA ops.
The first and foremost means of overthrowing Venezuela’s government
currently being utilized by the United States government is the low-risk,
low-cost plan to simply control the stories that everyone tells themselves
about who is in charge in Venezuela…
The Trump administration is
exploiting this exact principle in Venezuela by singling out some guy named Juan and calling him Mister President,
despite the fact that he’s never received a single vote for that office and
holds no actual power…
Everything the Trump administration
does to Venezuela is done with the goal of controlling the stories people tell
about it. They smash the country with
starvation sanctions, then tell everyone to believe that Maduro is starving his
people.
They stage a “humanitarian aid”
stunt on Venezuela’s border, then they lie and tell everyone that Maduro is
blocking all aid to Venezuela and setting aid trucks on fire, because he wants
to starve the hungry and kill the sick. It’s all about controlling the narrative
with the goal of changing who is recognized as the legitimate president of
Venezuela.
We saw this illustrated especially clearly in a recent press briefing
with the State Department’s “Special Representative for Venezuela”, war
criminal Elliott Abrams. Abrams was asked by a reporter to “explain to
us the article under which Mr. Guaido declared himself president” because “It
is said that it has expired last month.”
Indeed, when Guaido declared himself interim president back in January we were
told that it would be a month-long position in the interim while a new election
is prepared. As Reuters reported at the time, “Venezuela’s constitution
says if the presidency is determined to be vacant, new elections should be
called in 30 days and that the head of the congress should assume the
presidency in the meantime.”
But, since the Trump
administration’s coup-by-narrative has not gone as planned, Abrams stumbled all over himself informing the press that the
goalposts of the story have been moved:
ABRAMS: As to the Venezuelan
constitution, the National Assembly has passed a resolution that states that that 30-day period of interim presidency
will not start ending or counting until the day Nicolas Maduro leaves power. So
the 30 days doesn’t start now, it starts after Maduro. And they – that’s a
resolution of the National Assembly.
QUESTION: When did they – they did that after he —
ABRAMS: They did that – this is
roughly a month ago. We could try to find the date for you.
QUESTION: When he was – when he was – took the mantle of interim president,
that wasn’t there.
ABRAMS: Yes, when – that’s
correct. And so people —
QUESTION: Can you do that ex post facto like that?
ABRAMS: When people ask a question
how do —
QUESTION: That seems to be like saying I was elected for four years to be president,
and then two years in you change the rules so that your term didn’t start –
hasn’t even started yet. How does that happen?
ABRAMS: Well, you don’t get a vote
because you’re not in the National Assembly.
QUESTION: Well, you don’t. You’re not in the National Assembly either.
QUESTION: If it matters, does the
U.S. view that as constitutional under their system?
MR ABRAMS: Yes. I mean, we’re taking the – the National Assembly is the only
legitimate democratic institution left in Venezuela, and their interpretation
of the constitution, as you know, is that as of the date of this alleged term
for Maduro, the presidency is vacant. But they have also said that that 30-day
period starts when Maduro goes.
QUESTION: So Juan Guaido is the interim president of an interim that doesn’t
exist yet?
MR ABRAMS: The 30-day end to his
interim presidency starts counting. Because
he’s not in power, that’s the problem. Maduro is still there. So they
have decided that they will count that from when he actually is in power and
Maduro’s gone. I think it’s logical.
QUESTION: So then he really isn’t interim president, then?
MR ABRAMS: He is interim
president, but he’s not —
QUESTION: With no power.
MR ABRAMS: — able to exercise the
powers of the office because Maduro still is there.
QUESTION: So their interpretation is that until and unless he actually has the
power to run the country, he’s not actually the interim president?
MR ABRAMS: No. Their interpretation
is that the constitution requires a 30-day interim period, but it – those 30
days should not be counted while Maduro is still there exercising the powers of
his former office.
So to recap, Guaido is still the president of Venezuela after his 30-day window
closed because his interim presidency doesn’t currently exist, and because he
has no power. By those standards, I’m just as much president of Venezuela
as Guaido is. Where’s my meeting with Mike Pence?
But of course facts don’t figure
into this equation at all, because this is a coup by narrative. As we discussed
yesterday, narrative always takes precedence over fact in these games. They will keep referring to Juan the guy as
“President Guaido”, despite the admitted fact that he does not actually have
any of the powers or recognition that an actual president has, and
despite the fact that there is currently a guy in Caracas who does have all
those things. They will keep advancing this narrative control war until it
either succeeds or fails, and in the case of the latter they’ll change tactics
and try something else.
The battle for power is the battle
to control as many humans as possible, and the battle to control as many humans
as possible is the battle to control the stories those humans are telling each
other. Humans are storytelling animals, so if
you can control the stories you can control the humans. Understand this and
you’ll understand the behaviors of governments and media around the world.
Reminds me of the old routine “Who’s on first” the
nonsensical comedy routine of Abbot and Costello. The American people have nothing against the
people of Venezuela nor President Maduro, therefore they must be lied into
hating Maduro and believing that American military intervention is necessary to
“free the people of Venezuela from their own ignorance” and remove their
elected leader. The truth is the neocon’s
want to free them of their natural resources and right to self-governance.
These purely evil plans have one goal only, the goal to
seize the massive natural resources of Venezuela through American military
intervention. Those resources are then
to be divvied up among multi-national Zionist owned corporations. Nothing is to be gained by the people of
Venezuela, nor is there anything to be gained by the people of America who will
suffer immensely by “freeing the American people of their earned right to Social
Security, Medicare, retirement, Medicaid, Education, Infrastructure, Veteran
care and treasury.”
That is what these Zionist neocons do, they destroy America
for their profit. America has been a
pain in the side to the Zionist neocons who have a deep hatred of America for
being a check on the New World Order a/k/a Zionist imperialism that was
concocted in the 1980’s. These criminals
have never been brought to justice and now are running America’s foreign and
domestic policy, the goal of which is to destroy the American people and the
people of the world.
It would be one thing if these Neocon Zionist agents were
competent, but they are not. They are
the polar opposite of competent. Every one
of their military interventions have been abject failures. We now are beginning to see the horrific
results of their miserable failures.
Their first failure was Afghanistan where after almost 20 years of American
occupation US soldiers continue to die.
For what???
Their second HUGE failure is the almost 20 year illegal,
immoral and criminal occupation of Iraq.
Their dream of a multi-national rape of the oil reserves and a client
state willing to wage war against Iran is a bloody, deathly delusion. From Uprooted Palestinians:
Excerpt:
ELIJAH J. MAGNIER: “IRAN UPSTAGES THE US IN IRAQ”
Iranian President Hassan Rouhani is
visiting Iraq for three days, leading a large political and business delegation
to deepen the relationship between the two countries. Rouhani met with the
Iraqi President, Prime Minister, and Speaker of Parliament. The Iranian President visited Karbalaa this afternoon, is spending
the night in Najaf and will be visiting on Wednesday the highest religious
authority (Marjaiya) in the city the Grand Ayatollah Sayyed Ali al-Sistani,
Sayyed Mohamad Saeed al-Hakeem, Sheikh Ishaq al-Fayyad and Sheikh Bashir
al-Najafi.
Rouhani’s public visit contrasts starkly with Trump’s recent covert
visit to Iraq. Moreover, the projected economic and commercial cooperation
between Iraq and Iran will not only mitigate US unilateral sanctions but will
likely contribute to their failure. The bottom line question now arises: will Trump accept his loss to Iran or will
he choose to lose Iraq as well by imposing sanctions on Mesopotamia?
During
the last week of 2018, President Trump’s
plane turned off its lights to land safely in the US part of Ayn al-Assad
base in Anbar province. Trump’s visit was kept secret and the Iraqi
Prime Minister was informed on the same morning. Trump refused to land on the
Iraqi side of the same base (Iraq and the US share the same military base with
US forces holding full sovereignty over their area). For this reason, Prime Minister Adel Abdel Mahdi, the Speaker Mohamad
al-Halbousi and the President Barham Saleh refused to meet Trump, who stuck
to his schedule and landed at night.
Trump concluded his visit in
three hours and left under darkness of the night. He is reported to have murmured that it was not right that, for security
reasons, the US president was forced
to visit in secrecy in the middle of the night a country where the US has
invested hundreds of billions of dollars in its stability.
On the other hand, Rouhani informed the Iraqi presidency of
his visit a week in advance; the visit was publicly announced at the same time.
Iraqi officials coordinated the schedule of the Iranian President’s trip with
their Iranian counterparts. Rouhani is due to remain in Iraq for three days
to conclude important economic-commercial deals, raising the level of commerce
between the two countries to 20 billion dollars…
Trump has two choices. He could
choose to cut his relationship with Iraq, which would amount to shooting
himself in the foot. The presence of US forces in Iraq is essential to US
objectives and hegemony in the Middle East. Moreover, it is unclear for how
long US forces will be able to occupy Syria.
The alternative would be for Trump to accept the fact that his
sanctions against Iran will fail as Iranian-Iraqi energy and commercial deals
develop. In this case, the US President would be accepting the failure
of his sanctions and his plan to change the Iranian regime “in a few months”.
Whatever he decides, Trump has
lost: the US establishment failed in its
attempt to damage Iran and either change its ruling system or bring the country
to its knees. All Trump has accomplished is to put stress on the Iranian
economy, bringing hardship to the population while forcing local officials to
find new solutions, with the help of Iraq’s new leadership. The US failure
to impose its proxies as rulers of Iraq helped Soleimani win his medal of
honour.
Now that the Mueller witch hunt is over Trump would be wise
to dump this criminal cabal and revert to his natural instincts of pursuing
peace and cooperation. The neocon
Zionist adventure into regime change in Venezuela is already doomed and sure to
be a major disaster. Just as Putin’s
Russia, with its superior military capabilities was able to send the neocons running
with their tails tucked between their legs in Syria, Putin is ready to protect
the sovereignty of Venezuela. From Geopolitics:
Excerpt:
Russia Gives US Red Line on Venezuela
At a high-level meeting in Rome
this week, it seems that Russia
reiterated a grave warning to the US – Moscow will not tolerate American
military intervention to topple the Venezuelan government with whom it is
allied.
Meanwhile, back in Washington DC,
President Donald Trump was again bragging that the military option was still on
the table, in his press conference with Brazilian counterpart Jair Bolsonaro. Trump is bluffing or not yet up to speed
with being apprised of Russia’s red line.
The meeting in the Italian capital
between US “special envoy” on Venezuelan affairs Elliot Abrams and Russia’s
deputy foreign minister Sergei Ryabkov had an air of urgency in its
arrangement. The US State Department
announced the tête-à-tête only three days beforehand. The two officials
also reportedly held their two-hour discussions in a Rome hotel, a venue
indicating ad hoc arrangement.
Abrams is no ordinary diplomat. He is a regime-change specialist with a
criminal record for sponsoring terrorist operations, specifically the
infamous Iran-Contra affair to destabilize Nicaragua during the 1980s. His
appointment by President Trump to the “Venezuela file” only underscores the
serious intent in Washington for regime change in Caracas. Whether it gets away
with that intent is another matter.
Moscow’s interlocutor, Sergei
Ryabkov, is known to not mince his words, having earlier castigated Washington
for seeking global military domination. He
calls a spade a spade, and presumably a criminal a criminal.
The encounter in Rome this week was
described as “frank” and “serious” – which is diplomatic code for a blazing
exchange. The timing comes at a high-stakes moment, after Venezuela having been thrown into chaos last week from civilian
power blackouts that many observers, including the Kremlin, blame on American
cyber sabotage. The power grid
outage followed a failed attempt by Washington to stage a provocation with the
Venezuelan military over humanitarian aid deliveries last month from
neighboring Colombia.
The fact that Washington’s efforts
to overthrow the elected President Nicolas Maduro have so far floundered, might
suggest that the Americans are intensifying their campaign to destabilize the
country, with the objective of
installing US-backed opposition figure Juan Guaido. He declared himself “acting
president” in January with Washington’s imprimatur.
Given that the nationwide power blackouts seem to have failed in fomenting a
revolt by the civilian population or the military against Maduro, the next
option tempting Washington could be the military one.
It seems significant that
Washington has recently evacuated its last remaining diplomats from the South
American country. US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo commented on the evacuation
by saying that having US personnel on the ground “was limiting” Washington’s
scope for action. Also, American Airlines reportedly cancelled all its services
to Venezuela in the past week. Again, suggesting that the US was considering a
military intervention, either directly
with its troops or covertly by weaponizing local proxies. The latter certainly
falls under Abrams’ purview.
After the Rome meeting, Ryabkov
said bluntly: “We assume that Washington treats our priorities seriously, our
approach and warnings.” One of those
warnings delivered by Ryabkov is understood to have been that no American military intervention in
Venezuela will be tolerated by Moscow.
For his part, Abrams sounded as if he had emerged from the meeting after having been
given a severe reprimand. “No, we did not come to a meeting of minds, but I
think the talks were positive in the sense that both sides emerged with a
better understanding of the other’s views,” he told reporters.
“A better understanding of the other’s views,” means that the American
side was given a red line to back off. The
arrogance of the Americans is staggering. Abrams seems, according to US
reporting, to have flown to Rome with the expectation of working out with
Ryabkov a “transition” or “compromise” on
who gets the “title of president” of Venezuela. That’s what he no doubt
meant when he said after the meeting “there was not a meeting of minds”, but
rather he got “a better understanding” of Russia’s position.
Washington’s gambit is a replay of Syria. During the eight-year war
in that country, the US continually proffered the demand of a “political
transition” which at the end would see President Bashar al Assad standing down.
By contrast, Russia’s unflinching
position on Syria has always been that it’s not up to any external power to
decide Syria’s politics. It is a sovereign matter for the Syrian people to
determine independently.
Nearly three years after Russia intervened militarily in Syria to
salvage the Arab country from a US-backed covert war for regime change, the
American side has manifestly given up on its erstwhile imperious demands for
“political transition”. The principle of Syrian sovereignty has prevailed, in
large part because of Russia’s trenchant defense of its Arab ally.
Likewise, Washington, in its incorrigible arrogance, is getting another lesson
from Russia – this time in its own presumed “back yard” of Latin America… Moscow has reiterated countless times
that the legitimate president of Venezuela is Nicolas Maduro whom the people
voted for last year by an overwhelming majority in a free and fair election
– albeit boycotted by the US-orchestrated opposition.
The framework Washington is attempting to set up of choosing between
their desired “interim president” and incumbent Maduro is an entirely spurious
one. It is not even worthy to be discussed because it is a gross violation
of Venezuela’s sovereignty. Who is Washington to even dare try to impose its
false choice?
On Venezuela, Russia is having to
remind the criminal American rulers – again – about international law and
respect for national sovereignty, as Moscow earlier did with regard to Syria. And in
case Washington gets into a huff and tries the military option, Moscow this
week told regime-change henchman Abrams that that’s a red line. If
Washington has any sense of rationale left, it will know from its Syria fiasco
that Russia has Venezuela’s back covered.
Political force is out. Military
force is out. Respect international law and Venezuela’s sovereignty. That’s
Russia’s eminently reasonable ultimatum to Washington. Now, the desperate Americans could still try
more sabotage, cyber or financial. But
their options are limited, contrary to what Trump thinks.
How the days of American
imperialist swagger are numbered. There
was a time when it could rampage all over Latin America. Not any more,
evidently. Thanks in part to Russia’s global standing and military power.
Will the new members of congress repel the barrage of slings
and arrows raining down on them from the Zionist Deep State and shed light on
the true State of the Union, a dying super power who has been destroyed by
“elected” and “unelected” puppet agents of a foreign nation?
Much like the new members of congress, President Trump came
into office pledging to begin an era of “America First” the antithesis of the
neocon status quo, of the Zionist controlled government policy of “Netanyahu’s Israel
First.”
President George Washington warned against a “passionate attachment” to any foreign
nation that might create the illusion of some “common interest … where no
common interest exists.” It is
eerie to realize that the “passionate attachment to a foreign nation” that President
Washington warned about is the reality we find ourselves in today, President
Trump included.
Will Trump be able to stand up to these interlopers in his
administration now that the bogus Mueller probe is over? Will Americans come to their senses and
reject the incumbent politicians who have betrayed America on behalf of a
foreign nation? Or, will the neocon
Zionists give the Venezuelan people the kind of “freedom” they are famous for? That is the kind of “freedom that is just
another word for nothing left to lose.”
I guess we’ll see.
No comments:
Post a Comment