Big Lie: As Deep State celebrates 18th
anniversary of Saudi funded 911 terror Pompeo demands US bomb Iran to avenge
attack on Saudi oil
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will
eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as
the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military
consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use
all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the
lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.” ~ Joseph Goebbels
"Faith is something you believe that nobody in his right mind
would believe" ~ Archie Bunker
The 18th anniversary of the “big lie” that
allowed the Zionist regime to overthrow the American government and launch the
New World Order has passed. Who blew up World Trade Center and the
Pentagon ~ nineteen guys with box cutters or the CIA/Mossad/MI6 cabal? Once again the CIA controlled media have
advanced the Big Lie that a rag tag bunch of terrorists outmaneuvered the
greatest intelligence operation ever assembled and blew up the World Trade
Center and the Pentagon.
We are to believe that “some people” who took flying lessons
in Florida and Minnesota were able to overcome the flight crews on commercial
aircrafts and turn the planes around and aim them at the World Trade Center and
Pentagon and use them as missiles to blow up a couple the most protected
structures in America with no response from the air traffic controllers. The ridiculousness of this scenario which was
presented as fact by the American government requires a huge leap of
faith. But then again, as Archie Bunker
said “Faith is something you believe that nobody in his right mind would
believe.” From Veterans Today:
Excerpt:
Recovered From Russian Servers: 2010, 9/11 and the Impossibility of
Flying Heavy Aircraft without Training
There are some who maintain that the mythical 9/11 hijackers, although
proven to be too incompetent to fly a little Cessna 172, had acquired the
impressive skills that enabled them to fly airliners by training in flight
simulators…
A common misconception non-pilots
have about simulators is how “easy” it is to operate them. They are indeed relatively easy to operate if the objective is to make
a few lazy turns and frolic about in the “open sky”. But if the intent is
to execute any kind of a maneuver with even the least bit of precision, the
task immediately becomes quite daunting.
And if the aim is to navigate to a
specific geographic location hundreds of miles away while flying at over 500
MPH, 30,000 feet above the ground the
challenges become virtually impossible for an untrained pilot. And this, precisely, is what the four hijacker pilots who could not fly a
Cessna around an airport by themselves are alleged to have accomplished in
multi-ton, high-speed commercial jets on 9/11…
In order to operate a modern flight simulator with any level of skill,
one has to not only be a decent pilot to begin with, but also a skilled
instrument-rated one to boot — and be thoroughly familiar with the actual
aircraft type the simulator represents, since the cockpit layouts vary between
aircraft…
In the case of a Boeing 757 or 767, the pilot would be faced with an
EFIS (Electronic Flight Instrumentation System) panel comprised of six large
multi-mode LCDs interspersed with
clusters of assorted “hard” instruments. These displays process the raw
aircraft system and flight data into an integrated picture of the aircraft
situation, position and progress, not only in horizontal and vertical
dimensions, but also with regard to time and speed as well.
When flying “blind”, I.e., with no
ground reference cues, it takes a
highly skilled pilot to interpret, and then apply, this data intelligently.
If one cannot translate this information
quickly, precisely and accurately (and it takes an instrument-rated pilot
to do so), one would have ZERO SITUATIONAL AWARENESS. I.e., the pilot wouldn’t
have a clue where s/he was in relation to the earth. Flight under
such conditions is referred to as “IFR”, or Instrument Flight Rules…
Let me place this in the context of
the 9/11 hijacker-pilots. These men were
repeatedly deemed incompetent to solo a simple Cessna-172 — an elementary
exercise that involves flying this little trainer once around the patch on a
sunny day. A student’s first solo flight involves a simple circuit: take-off,
followed by four gentle left turns ending with a landing back on the runway.
This is as basic as flying can possibly get.
Not one of the hijackers was
deemed fit to perform this most elementary exercise by himself. In fact, here’s what their flight
instructors had to say about the aptitude of these budding aviators:
Mohammed Atta: “His attention span was zero.”
Khalid Al-Mihdhar: “We didn’t kick him out, but he didn’t live up to
our standards.”
Marwan Al-Shehhi: “He was dropped because of his limited English and
incompetence at the controls.”
Salem Al-Hazmi: “We advised him to quit after two lessons.”
Hani Hanjour: “His English was horrible, and his mechanical skills were
even worse. It was like he had hardly even ever driven a car. I’m still to this
day amazed that he could have flown into the Pentagon. He could not fly at
all.”
Now let’s take a look at American
Airlines Flight 77. Passenger/hijacker
Hani Hanjour presumably rises from his seat midway through the flight,
viciously fights his way into the cockpit with his cohorts, overpowers Captain
Charles F. Burlingame and First Officer David Charlebois, and somehow manages
to toss them out of the cockpit (for starters, very difficult to achieve in
a cramped environment without inadvertently impacting the yoke and thereby
disengaging the autopilot).
One would correctly presume that this would present considerable
difficulties to a little chap with a box cutter—Burlingame was a tough,
burly, ex-Vietnam F4 fighter jock who had flown over 100 combat missions. Every pilot who knows him says that
rather than politely hand over the controls, Burlingame would have instantly
rolled the plane on its back so that Hanjour would have broken his neck
when he hit the floor. But let’s ignore this almost natural reaction
expected of a fighter pilot and proceed with this charade…
Imagine that Hanjour overpowers the flight deck crew, removes them from
the cockpit and takes his position in the captain’s seat… If Hanjour looked straight ahead through the
windshield, or off to his left at the ground, at best he would see, 35,000 feet
— 7 miles — below him, a murky brownish-grey-green landscape, virtually devoid
of any significant surface detail,
while the aircraft he was now piloting was moving along, almost imperceptibly
and in eerie silence, at around 500 MPH (about 750 feet every second).
In a real-world scenario, with
this kind of “situational NON-awareness”, Hanjour might as well have been
flying over Argentina, Russia, or Japan—he wouldn’t have had a clue as to
where, precisely, he was.
After a few seconds (at 750
ft/sec), Hanjour would figure out there’s little point in looking
outside—there’s nothing there to give him any real visual cues.
For a man who had previously wrestled with little Cessnas, following freeways
and railroad tracks (and always in the comforting presence of an instructor),
this would have been a strange, eerily unsettling environment indeed…
He would then have to very quickly
interpret his heading, ground track, altitude, and airspeed information on the
displays before he could even figure out where in the world he was, much
less where the Pentagon was located in relation to his position.
After all, before he can crash
into a target, he has to first find the target.
It is very difficult to explain
this scenario, of an utter lack of ground reference, to non-pilots; but
let it suffice to say that for these incompetent hijacker non-pilots to even
consider grappling with such a daunting task would have been utterly
overwhelming. They wouldn’t have known
where to begin.
But, for the sake of discussion let’s stretch things beyond all
plausibility and say that Hanjour—whose flight instructor claimed “couldn’t
fly at all”—somehow managed to figure out their exact position on the
American landscape in relation to their intended target as they traversed the
earth at a speed five times faster than
they had ever flown by themselves before.
Once he had determined exactly
where he was, he would need to figure out where the Pentagon was located in relation
to his rapidly-changing position. He
would then need to plot a course to his target (one he cannot see with his eyes—remember, our ace is flying solely
on instruments)…
If one is to believe the
official story, all of this was supposedly accomplished by raw student pilots
while flying blind at 500 MPH over unfamiliar (and practically invisible)
terrain, using complex methodologies and employing sophisticated instruments…
To get around this little problem, the official storyline suggests these men
manually flew their aircraft to their respective targets (NB: This
still wouldn’t relieve them of the burden of navigation). But let’s assume Hanjour disengaged the
autopilot and auto-throttle and hand-flew the aircraft to its intended—and
invisible—target on instruments alone until such time as he could get a visual
fix.
This would have necessitated him to fly back across West Virginia and
Virginia to Washington DC. (This portion of Flight 77’s flight path
cannot be corroborated by any radar evidence that exists, because the aircraft
is said to have suddenly disappeared from radar screens over Ohio.)
According to FAA radar
controllers, “Flight 77” then suddenly pops up over Washington DC and executes
an incredibly precise diving turn at a rate of 360 degrees/minute while
descending at 3,500 ft/min, at the end of which “Hanjour” allegedly levels out
at ground level. Oh, I almost forgot: He also had the
presence of mind to turn off the transponder in the middle of this incredibly
difficult maneuver (one of his instructors later commented the hapless fellow
couldn’t have spelt the word if his life depended on it).
The maneuver was in fact so
precisely executed that the air traffic controllers at Dulles refused to
believe the blip on their screen was a commercial airliner. Danielle O’Brian,
one of the air traffic controllers at Dulles who reported seeing the aircraft
at 9:25 said, “The speed, the
maneuverability, the way that he turned, we all thought in the radar room, all
of us experienced air traffic controllers, that that was a military plane.”
And then, all of a sudden we
have magic. Voila! Hanjour finds the Pentagon sitting squarely in his sights
right before him.
But even that wasn’t good enough
for this fanatic Muslim kamikaze pilot. You see, he found that his “missile” was heading towards one of the most
densely populated wings of the Pentagon—and one occupied by top military brass,
including the Secretary of Defense, Rumsfeld.
Presumably in order to save
these men’s lives, he then executes a sweeping 270-degree turn and
approaches the building from the opposite direction and aligns himself with the
only wing of the Pentagon that was virtually uninhabited due to extensive
renovations that were underway (there were some 120 civilians construction workers
in that wing who were killed; their work included blast-proofing the outside
wall of that wing)…
Let it suffice to say that it
is physically impossible to fly a 200,000-lb airliner 20 feet above the ground
at 400 MPH…
The writers of the official
storyline expect us to believe, that once the flight deck crews had
been overpowered, and the hijackers “took control” of the various aircraft,
their intended targets suddenly popped up in their windshields as they would
have in some arcade game, and all that these fellows would have had to do
was simply aim their airplanes at the buildings and fly into them.
Most people who have been exposed
only to the official storyline have never been on the flight deck of an
airliner at altitude and looked at the outside world; if they had,
they’d realize the absurdity of this kind of reasoning.
“The lie can be
maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the
political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie.” How true, and having a CIA controlled
media helps to maintain the “Big Lie” and all its “political, economic and/or
military consequences of the lie.”
The lie persists today and so do all its consequences. Seven wars have been started as a consequence
of the “Big Lie.” In an ironic turn of events, the CIA/MI6 and Mossad have
“become” (and I use the term “become” loosely) the biggest recruiters of
terrorists providing financial and logistical support under the guise of the
“war on terrorism. (Who can forget the fleet of brand new Toyota SUV’s provided
to ISIS in Syria) From Global Research:
Excerpt:
The Mystery of ISIS’ Toyota Army Solved
The US Treasury has recently opened
an inquiry about the so-called “Islamic State’s” (ISIS/ISIL) use of large
numbers of brand-new Toyota trucks. The issue has arisen in the wake of
Russia’s air operations over Syria and growing
global suspicion that the US itself has played a key role in arming, funding,
and intentionally perpetuating the terrorist army across Syria and Iraq. ABC News in their article, “US Officials
Ask How ISIS Got So Many Toyota Trucks,” reports:
U.S. counter-terror officials have asked Toyota, the world’s second
largest auto maker, to help them determine how ISIS has managed to acquire the
large number of Toyota pick-up trucks and SUVs seen prominently in the
terror group’s propaganda videos in Iraq, Syria and Libya, ABC News has
learned.
Toyota says it does not know how ISIS obtained the vehicles and is
“supporting” the inquiry led by the Terror Financing unit of the Treasury
Department — part of a broad U.S. effort to prevent Western-made goods from
ending up in the hands of the terror group.
The report went on to cite Iraqi Ambassador to the US, Lukman Faily:
“This is a question we’ve been
asking our neighbors,” Faily said.
“How could these brand new trucks… these four wheel drives, hundreds of them —
where are they coming from?” Not
surprisingly, it appears the US Treasury
is asking the wrong party. Instead of Toyota, the US Treasury’s inquiry should
have started next door at the US State Department.
Mystery Solved
Just last year it was reported that the US State Department had been
sending in fleets of specifically Toyota-brand trucks into Syria to whom they
claimed was the “Free Syrian Army.” US
foundation-funded Public Radio International (PRI) reported in a 2014 article
titled, “This one Toyota pickup truck
is at the top of the shopping list for the Free Syrian Army — and the
Taliban,” that:
The U.S. Government Supplied
ISIS’ Iconic Pickup Trucks
Recently, when the US State
Department resumed sending non-lethal aid to Syrian rebels, the delivery list included 43 Toyota trucks. Hiluxes were on the Free Syrian Army’s
wish list. Oubai Shahbander, a Washington-based advisor to the Syrian National
Coalition, is a fan of the truck.
“Specific equipment like the Toyota
Hiluxes are what we refer to as force enablers for the moderate opposition
forces on the ground,” he adds. Shahbander says
the US-supplied pickups will be delivering troops and supplies into battle.
Some of the fleet will even become battlefield weapons..
The British government has
also admittedly supplied a number of vehicles to terrorists fighting inside of
Syria. The British Independent’s 2013 article titled, “Revealed:
What the West has given Syria’s rebels,” reported that (emphasis added):
So far the UK has sent around £8m of “non-lethal” aid, according to
official papers seen by The Independent,
comprising five 4×4 vehicles with ballistic protection; 20 sets of body armour;
four trucks (three 25 tonne, one 20 tonne); six 4×4 SUVs; five non-armoured
pick-ups; one recovery vehicle; four fork-lifts; three advanced “resilience
kits” for region hubs, designed to rescue people in emergencies; 130 solar
powered batteries; around 400 radios; water purification and rubbish collection
kits; laptops; VSATs (small satellite systems for data communications) and
printers.
It’s fair to say that whatever
pipeline the US State Department and the British government used to supply
terrorists in Syria with these trucks was likely used to send additional
vehicles before and after these reports were made public.
The mystery of how hundreds of
identical, brand-new ISIS-owned Toyota trucks have made it into Syria is
solved. Not only has the US and British
government admitted in the past to supplying them, their military forces and
intelligence agencies ply the borders of Turkey, Jordan, and even Iraq where
these fleets of trucks must have surely passed on their way to Syria – even
if other regional actors supplied them.
While previous admissions to
supplying the vehicles implicates the West directly, that nothing resembling interdiction operations have been set up
along any of these borders implicates the West as complicit with other parties
also supplying vehicles to terrorists inside of Syria.
What Mystery?
Of course, much of this is not new
information. So the question remains – why is the US Treasury just now carrying
on with this transparent charade? Perhaps
those in Washington believe that if the US government is the one asking this
obvious question of how ISIS has managed to field such an impressive mechanized
army in the middle of the Syrian desert, no one will suspect they had a role in
it.
Of course, the trucks didn’t
materialize in Syria. They originated
outside of Syria and were brought in, and in great numbers, with the explicit
knowledge and/or direct complicity of the US and its regional allies. ASKING TOYOTA WHERE THE US STATE
DEPARTMENT’S OWN TRUCKS CAME FROM IS ANOTHER INDICATION OF JUST HOW LOST US
FOREIGN POLICY, LEGITIMACY, AND CREDIBILITY HAS BECOME.
Russia’s intervention, and what
should become a widely supported anti-terror coalition must keep
in mind the criminality of the US and its partners when choosing
its own partners in efforts to restore security and order across the Middle
East and North Africa.
Ahh, yes it’s the proverbial chicken and the egg question, what
came first? Was it the 911 attacks that
resulted in the US/MI6/Mossad support of terrorists or was the US/MI6/Mossad
recruiting and supporting the terrorists who perpetrated the 911 attacks? That is the question that the media should be
asking, but alas “fat chance” for the media’s job is to “repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus
by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.” From David Stockman at Lew Rockwell:
Excerpt:
Locked and Loaded on Behalf of Empire First
American democracy and capitalist prosperity are dying on the vine of
Empire. And this weekend’s drone attack on the largest oil processing
facility on the planet is a graphic case of why. So is the related picture below.
The scene is of Yemenis burying a busload of children who were obliterated by
American-made bombs delivered by American-made Saudi aircraft, which
were being navigated to target by US command and control assets.
This particular cruel foray was
just one of thousands of sorties
launched by the Saudis since 2015, which have resulted in upwards of 100,000
civilian deaths in northern Yemen and the virtual destruction of its
economy – meaning horrific outbreaks of starvation, cholera and other
diseases have become commonplace.
The cost to the Yemenis in misery and human life is incalculable.
Nor can the stain of these genocidal attacks on America’s moral stature be
gainsaid. Yet Washington’s collaboration in this mayhem is not based on even a
smidgen of national interest or homeland security.
To the contrary, the Houthi who
took control of Yemen’s capital (Sana’a) and who dominate the population of
northern Yemen, are a second cousin practitioner of the Shiite confession of
Islam. Accordingly, they are aligned with the Shiite regime of Iran and have
received modest aid and weapons from
Tehran in support of their struggle for independence from the Saudi-supported
government in exile and its alignment with a motley array of
Sunni-jihadist, Muslim Brotherhood and other anti-Shiite factions in southern
Yemen.
Of course, given the fact that Yemen was divided into two countries –
North and South Yemen – for nearly three decades between the early 1960s and
early 1990s, it’s obvious that no war, bloodshed or devastation is needed at
all to solve the religious and ethnic enmities of that godforsaken armpit
of the world. All that’s needed is re-partition.
It’s
simple. Two countries. No war. No misery. No genocide.
And, in fact, back in 2015
Washington could have told the new Saudi King (Salman) in no uncertain terms to
accept partition or “no tickie, no washie”. That is, don’t you dare use a single American supplied aircraft or bomb to carry
out war against the Houthi of North Yemen – or we will cut off resupply of spare-parts
and technical support to the Saudi military’s advanced American-made
weaponry. And without the latter, of
course, Switzerland would soon become the new abode of the monarchy.
But Washington’s neocons were having none of letting the world go its
own way and staying out of other people’s quarrels. To the contrary, the neocons on
Capitol Hill and in the national security bureaucracy were dead-set on war with
Iran’s current regime, and saw an attack on the Houthi as a way to
administer a bloody-nose to Tehran; and one which could be performed with no
muss or fuss by nominal Saudi proxies.
At the time, Obama was on the verge
of his single greatest foreign policy achievement in the form of the Nuke Deal
with Iran, but Barry was a weak double-talker when push-came-to-shove. So he
failed to step in forcefully and deter the Saudis from their own folly, thereby
throwing a bone to the Netanyahu fifth column in Washington who were
otherwise dead-set against the deal, and even invited Bibi to give a speech
to a joint session of Congress that was an hideous affront to the American
president.
So the Saudis were manipulated into massive but wholly unnecessary
military attacks on their southern neighbor. In effect, they became
unwitting mercenaries – handmaids of Empire – because it suited Washington’s
purposes. Someday they may actually
learn that Washington’s “friendship” is a many edged sword. But in the end it’s
based on mobilizing “allies” to buy its
weapons and to march into conflicts which keep America’s Warfare State in
fiscal clover.
In the big picture context,
therefore, Empire Firsters have managed
to get Washington squarely in the middle of a 1300 year-old Shiite/Sunni
conflict – one that is now being waged in the clash between Saudi Arabia
and Iran. But that conflict has no bearing whatsoever on Homeland security: America
has never had, does not have now, nor ever will have a dog in that hunt.
The
Sunni/Shiite religious schism is their business to fight out, as it has been
since 632AD…
But Washington does not have a snowballs’ chance in the hot place of being
any more successful at regime change in Persia, than it has been in Iraq,
Syria, Libya, Somalia etc. And more importantly, Iran with a tiny $15 billion defense budget and $450 billion GDP has
never threatened the American Homeland and has zero capacity to do so
anyway.
But that has not stopped the Washington/Netanyahu War Party. We’d
bet dollars-to-donuts that when the Saudis were green lighted back in 2015 to
proceed with their Yemen adventure that they did not remotely contemplate
that the Nuke Deal would be shit-canned by a new administration and that it
would proceed to launch all-out economic war against its rival on the other
side of the Persian Gulf.
Stated differently, we don’t think Riyadh anticipated the
arrival of Donald Trump in the Oval Office or, more importantly, that he
would be surrounded by the deplorable retinue of Bibi retainers and neocon
acolytes who falsely persuaded the ill-educated New York real estate
mogul gambler that Obama’s Nuke Deal was the worst foreign policy agreement in
recorded history.
It wasn’t. It was actually a clever
diplomatic scam of sorts in which the Iranians agreed to give up a nuclear
weapons program, which both the CIA and IAEA (International Atomic
Energy Agency) agreed was disbanded way back in 2003, in return for the
release of several tens of billions of long ago sequestered funds, which was
their own money in the first place.
It also submitted itself to a
draconian inspection regime. The latter was with respect to a drastically
scaled-back uranium enrichment program to produce civilian reactor fuel at 3.5%
purity (vs. 90% bomb grade), which it is
entitled to have as a signatory to the nuclear nonproliferation treaty along
with several dozen other countries.
More importantly, it paved the way
for the return of Iran to unhindered global commerce and the maximization of
its great hydrocarbon resource for the benefit of its long-suffering people. So
doing, the nuke deal paved the way for
Iran’s moderate leadership under President Hassan Rouhani and its capable and
American educated foreign minister, Javad Zarif, to steer Iran along a path
that might have defused the three decade long confrontation with Washington.
But it was not to be because
the Washington neocons were not about to give up the “enemy” state that keeps
them in business, and Bibi Netanyahu was not about to give up the “existential
enemy” that keeps his motley coalition of settler parties and
ultra-orthodox religious factions together and ensures his tenure in office.
Instead, under the vile leadership of the late John Bolton we now have the
nastiest economic warfare campaign that has ever been launched by Washington.
It includes browbeating virtually every country and every significant company
in the world not to buy Iranian oil or transact most other forms of business – upon threat of secondary sanctions and
exclusion from the U.S. controlled SWIFT global payments system…
Needless to say, the fools advising the Donald have now backed
Iran into an impossible corner. They
must strike back – as they apparently did through their Houthi proxies this
weekend – or see their country virtually destroyed, and for what?
The
answer is not that they violated either the letter or the spirit of the Nuke
Deal – because they did not.
No, they are on the receiving end of Washington economic warfare machine
solely because Bibi and the neocons do not like Iran’s foreign policy and its
legitimate alliances with Shiite-oriented governments and parties in Iraq,
Syria and Hezbollah/Lebanon; and because the
Warfare State has made Iran its designated enemy and bogeyman needed to keep
its massive defense budgets flowing.
So we can imagine the Saudis
surprise and/or chagrin. By going after
the Houthi they have ended up putting virtually 100% of the economic resources
and wealth on which the Kingdom depends in harms’ way (and jeopardizing
Aramco’s pending IPO needed to liquefy it), and for reasons that are far afield
from their own national security (they
could readily coexist with Iran and have done so through most of modern
history)
Whether
they acknowledge it or not, the War Party has made the Kingdom hostage to it
own demented ambitions.
Yet that’s how the Empire rolls.
The Persian Gulf is on the verge of an apocalyptic eruption that is absolutely
not in the interest of any producer – Iraq, Kuwait, Iran, Saudi Arabia, UAE,
Bahrain, Qatar – that borders on its waters. But events may now overtake sanity because the one person who could
reel in the impending catastrophe is busy tweeting proof that he is dangerously
ignorant of the issues and stakes involved:
President Trump warned on Sunday
that the US was “locked and loaded,” and prepared to strike when America and
Saudi Arabia identified who was responsible.
“There is reason to believe that we know the culprit, are locked and
loaded depending on verification,” Mr. Trump wrote on Twitter. “But are waiting to hear from the Kingdom
as to who they believe was the cause of this attack, and under what terms we would
proceed!”
On Monday, Mr. Trump tweeted a reminder of Iran’s behavior when it shot down a US
drone in June, a strike that led the US to prepare a military strike
against Iran. Mr. Trump called off the strike after having second thoughts.
“Remember when Iran shot down a drone, saying knowingly that it was in
their ‘airspace’ when, in fact, it was nowhere close,” he said. “They stuck strongly to that story
knowing that it was a very big lie. Now they say they had nothing to do with
the attack on Saudi Arabia. We’ll see?”
No, POTUS, the real culprit is
the War Party that has utterly mis-educated you on the Nuke Deal, the phony
threat Iran allegedly poses to Homeland security and the impossible corner into
which you have backed the government in Tehran.
You came to Washington to house-clean the Swamp and to put America
First at the center of the nation’s failed foreign policy. What you are in
danger of accomplishing is enabling the Empire Firsters to ignite a
conflagration in the Persian Gulf that could bring the entire world economy to
its knees.
And, by the way, ensure that you leave office in January 2021 with a
likely berth in a place not nearly as commodious as Trump Tower.
President Trump is surrounded by agents of the
CIA/MI6/Mossad whose sole purpose is to wage World War III for Empire and a one
world order. The problem is that Saudi
Arabia is on a fool’s mission. They
believe they are protected by the American military industrial complex’s expensive
“missile shield” boondoggle. From Finian
Cunningham at Strategic Culture:
Excerpt:
Yemeni Killer Blow to House of Saud
The Yemeni rebels’ drone blitz on the “nerve center” of Saudi Arabia’s
oil industry was a devastating counter-offensive which potentially could end
the four-year war in short order. What is even more catastrophic for the
Saudi monarchy – especially the ambitious Crown Prince – is that the Houthi rebels have wielded the ultimate
power to crash the kingdom’s oil economy.
Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman
(MbS) was the main architect of the disastrous Saudi war on Yemen. His
military hard-man display was meant to consolidate his rise to power as heir to
the Saudi throne. It was a calculation
based on the blood of the Yemeni people. But now the war has gone from a
callous game to a far-more dangerous threat to the House of Saud’s seat of
power. If the Saudi oil economy is put at severe risk, then the lifeline for
the monarchy is liable to be cut.
After last weekend’s spectacular
air strike on the main oil processing plant in Saudi Arabia – northeast of the
capital Riyadh, some 1,000 kms from Yemen – the Houthi military leadership is warning that more deeply-penetrating
aerial attacks are on the way. The Yemeni rebels have demonstrated that
nowhere in Saudi Arabia is safe.
Saudi air defenses and their
multi-billion-dollar US Patriot anti-missile systems have been rendered useless
against an-ever increasing arsenal of more sophisticated unmanned aerial
vehicles (UAVs) operated out of Yemen. UN experts reckon that the Houthis’ UAV-X drone has a range of up to
1,500 kms, which means that all of the Saudi oil infrastructure located in the
Eastern Province near the Persian Gulf is a viable target.
Last weekend’s air strikes carried out with 10 drones, according to the
Houthis, caused Saudi oil output to shut down by nearly half. The main
target – the Abqaiq refinery – processes some 70 per cent of all Saudi crude
destined for export. It is not clear when the processing plant can be restored
to normal function. It may take weeks or even months. But if the Yemeni rebels can inflict that extent of damage in one air
raid, it is not hard to foresee how the Saudi oil-dependent economy could
conceivably be brought to a crippling standstill.
“The only option for the Saudi
government is to stop attacking us,” said a Houthi military
spokesman following the drone strikes. The
rebels also warned foreign workers in Saudi Arabia associated with the
country’s oil industry to vacate.
The Yemenis have a gun to the House
of Saud’s head. It must give the rebels
great satisfaction to finally have the Saudi monarchy in their cross-hairs after four years of Yemen suffering
relentless aerial bombardment and siege by the US-backed Saudi military.
The Saudi-led war on its southern neighbor – the poorest country in the
Arab region – was always an outrageous aggression under the guise of supporting the return of a corrupt crony
who had been ousted by the Yemenis in early 2015. Up to 100,000 people have been killed – most of them from the
indiscriminate bombing campaign by Saudi (and Emirati) warplanes supplied and
armed by the US, Britain and France. Millions face starvation in what
the UN calls the worst humanitarian crisis for many years.
The Saudi rulers, Western governments and media have tried to
obscure the genocidal war on Yemen as a “proxy war” involving Iran, as if
Tehran is the instigator of subverting Saudi Arabia from the south. Iran
backs the Houthis politically, and perhaps also militarily more recently, but
any involvement by Tehran is a reaction to the initial Western-backed Saudi
aggression against Yemen.
Claims by US and Saudi officials that Iran is responsible for the
latest air strikes on Saudi Arabia’s vital oil industry are more of the same
obfuscation. Such muddying of the waters is an attempt to distract from
the central point that the Houthis are
retaliating with the legitimate right of self-defense after years of merciless
slaughter inflicted on their people by the Western-backed Saudi
coalition.
There’s another urgent reason for
why the Saudi rulers and the US are trying to blame Iran for the latest drone
attacks on the Saudi oil industry. If admitted that the air raids were carried
out primarily by the Houthis – perhaps even with Iranian drone technology –
then that admission points to the
complete vulnerability of the Saudi oil economy and the very power structure of
the monarchial rulers.
A hint of the trepidation being
felt in Riyadh are reports that the latest air strikes have rattled stock
markets for Saudi petrochemical companies. WORSE,
IT IS ALSO REPORTED THAT THE ATTACKS MAY DELAY THE PLANNED STOCK MARKET LISTING
OF SAUDI ARAMCO, THE STATE-OWNED OIL COMPANY. Worse still, the valuation of
the company may be slashed due to the perceived risk from further Yemeni air
strikes.
The planned Initial Public Offering (IPO) of Aramco – whereby the Saudi
state is SELLING A PORTION OF THE COMPANY TO PRIVATE INVESTORS – has been
one of the most talked about events in recent years among international
business. The IPO which is due to be launched next year has been called THE “BIGGEST-EVER” STOCK MARKET SELL-OFF…
After the Houthis’ devastating air
attacks on the Saudi oil heartland – the crown jewels of the kingdom –
potential investors are now reportedly looking warily at the future risk of
Aramco. Valuation of the company in the
aftermath of the Yemeni drone strikes has been slashed by some estimates to
$300 billion – that’s down by 85 per cent from the previous aspired-for $2,000
billion…
It must be alarming to the young Saudi potentate that US President
Donald Trump has begun to play down any retaliation against Iran, saying that
he doesn’t want to be drawn into a war. That means the Saudi monarchs are on their own
and at the mercy of the Houthis and what they do next. The downfall of the
scheming Crown Prince evokes a Shakespearian drama of treachery.
Bingo, the reason “media whores” like Lindsay Graham are
demanding Trump blow up Iran is because their Zionist financial backers are demanding
it. Before the smoke was cleared Graham,
Pompeo and the entire Zionist CIA/MI6/Mossad backed cabal blamed Iran, with
absolutely no evidence what so ever.
From Tom Luongo:
Excerpt:
Questions, Not Answers Surround U.S. Push to War with Iran
When President Trump fired National
Security Adviser John Bolton last week rational people the world over cheered. When there was news that Trump would meet on the sidelines of the U.N. General
Assembly with Iran’s President Rouhani in a few weeks there were sighs of
relief. When Benjamin Netanyahu goes to Moscow to get Vladimir Putin’s
blessing to continue airstrikes in Syria and was told no, the world said,
“Finally! Enough is enough.”
The problem is that there were also very powerful people who
were not happy about these things. Moreover,
there are a lot of nervous people out there worried that Tuesday’s election in
Israel will not go the way they want it.
A lot of people have invested a
lot of time and money in ensuring Netanyahu stays in power. And I don’t
just mean Bibi himself, who will likely go to jail on corruption charges if he
doesn’t win.
I mean a lot of people in the U.S., Saudi Arabia, the U.K. and in
Europe, all of the places where anti-Russian, anti-Iranian and pro-Israeli sentiments
abound. And this brings up the main
question I always have in the wake of one of these major escalations of
tensions with the country currently catching the Twin Eyes of Sauron in D.C.
and Tel Aviv.
Why do they always seem to occur right after moments of de-escalation
and there’s the threat of peace breaking out somewhere? Why
is it that every time President Trump tries to push the U.S. and the world away
from war within a few days there’s an incident which pushes us right back to
the brink of it?
Trump visits Kim Jong-un in North Korea, making history, there are
attacks on UAE oil tankers. Trump refuses to attack Iran over them shooting
down a Global Hawk drone in Iranian airspace escorted by a fully-crewed
Poseiden P-8. Britain seizes the Grace
1 oil tanker. Israel attacks Shi’ite Militia targets outside of Baghdad.
Go back to President Trump’s first, and biggest, geopolitical blunder in April
2017. The Syrian Army wins a major
battle and is on the verge of victory, and a chemical weapons attack happens
deep in Al-Qaeda controlled territory blamed on the SAA. Trump
then launches 57 tomahawks at the Al-Shairat airbase.
Trump declares we’re pulling out of Syria, Israel openly bombs targets
deep in Syria. His staff, including John Bolton, freak out and walk it
back.
The Houthis send a couple of drones at an Aramco facility far beyond
their known capabilities and the UAE pulls out of the Saudi coalition in Yemen.
MOSCOW HAS HAD ITS FILL OF NETANYAHU. He’s openly mocking Trump at international forums, first offering to
sell the U.S. Russia’s hypersonic missiles at the G-20 and then offering to sell S-400 missile defense systems to the Saudis to
protect their people from outside actors. All with tongue firmly
implanted in cheek, but like with all good comedy a core of undeniable truth.
Things look bad for the alliance between the U.S., Israel and Saudi
Arabia, when your opponents are
laughing at you openly. In that moment Putin exposed that the emperor truly was standing naked in front of
the world.
And yet, after all of these
coincidences I’m supposed to believe,
without evidence again, that Iran would jeopardize its future at the very
moment when everything is beginning to break their way and the U.S. maximum
pressure campaign is failing?
The very fact that we have been shown zero proof of what
happened more than 48 hours after the event which has every neocon in the U.S.
clamoring for war is your biggest tell that there is something very off
about this incident.
EVEN PRESIDENT TRUMP DOESN’T BELIEVE THIS as he is taking the same
tack rhetorically now that he did after the U.S. Global Hawk drone was shot
down.
We’ve gone from:
Donald J. Trump
✔
@realDonaldTrump
Saudi Arabia oil supply was
attacked. There is reason to believe
that we know the culprit, are locked and loaded depending on verification,
but are waiting to hear from the Kingdom as to who they believe was the cause
of this attack, and under what terms we would proceed!
85.9K
5:50 PM - Sep 15, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
56.9K people are talking about
this
To:
“I don’t want to have war with
anybody” but our military is prepared, Trump says at the White House, where he
was meeting with Bahrain Crown Prince Salman bin Hamad Al Khalifa. Furthermore, the president said the US is not looking
at retaliatory options until he has “definitive proof” that Iran was
responsible for attacks on Saudi Arabian oil facilities.
Still, Trump told reporters in the
Oval Office that the US “is prepared” if the attacks warrant a response. Also notably, when asked if he has promised to protect the Saudis, the president
responded “No, I haven’t promised the Saudis that… We have to sit down with
the Saudis and work something out.”
Moreover, the stunning lack of support from Europe and the rest of the world
makes it incredibly suspect that the story that we’ve been told to date,
just like with the Global Hawk drone, is anything close to the real one. I
guess we’re not even trying to get Europe on our side to form ‘coalitions of
the willing’ anymore. And it
seems Trump may believe that as well.
In the end, as always, we should be asking the most salient
question surrounding this attack. Cui Bono? (Who Benefits?) Because it certainly isn’t Iran. But we know who. The bombs had barely hit their targets when AIPAC’s favorite son,
Lindsay Graham, was out in full throat for war. Secretary of State Mike
Pompeo told the world Iran was behind 100 strikes of this kind.
NOT A SHRED OF EVIDENCE. And
Trump’s first response was to subordinate U.S. troops sworn to uphold the
Constitution and defend the U.S. to the terrorist-funding, repressive regime in
Saudi Arabia to do what, exactly?
The Saudis needs $80+ per
barrel oil. The U.S. frackers need $60+ and zero-bound
interest rates to keep the red ink flowing just slow enough to get
yield-starved pension funds to bite on the next round of unpayable loans.
Israel needs a strong alliance
and U.S. presence in the Middle East lest it have to act like a normal country by
respecting its borders and making nice with its neighbors now that it has been exposed as one of the chief
architects and supporters of the project to turn Syria into a failed state
run by Takfiri crazies and anyone else no one wants in their back yard.
But the biggest question of all in
this is simple. HOW DUMB DO THESE PEOPLE
THINK WE ARE? We can read licence
plates from space but we can’t tell
where a swarm of missiles that his one of the most strategically important
piece of real estate in the entire world came from? Seriously?
Whenever a major incident like this happens there’s always this
ridiculous fog of war over what happened to obfuscate reality and blame the
current enemy of the empire. The truth
is that the Houthis could have pulled this off with help from Iran and there’s
little to stop it from happening again and again. They proved their point a few
weeks ago.
The Saudis have lost in Yemen.
They are now losing a helluva lot more than that. Iran is serious about taking everyone’s
ability to sell oil off the table if they are denied. Why should anyone be surprised that the
Houthis want to cripple Saudi Arabia for its disastrous war and Iran wouldn’t
want to assist them in doing so? Moreover,
why isn’t their response justified given the blatant aggression against both?
When is someone in D.C. going
to finally realize there is no winning play with Iran anymore except peace?
The neocon Zionist, America hating cabal that has taken over
Washington uses the American military and our troops like pawns on a
chessboard. As Tom Luongo points out, “Trump’s
first response was to subordinate U.S. troops sworn to uphold the Constitution and defend the U.S. to the terrorist-funding, repressive regime in Saudi Arabia to do what,
exactly?
How do our military members feel about having their lives
sacrificed for the oil profits of a country that funded the 911 terror attacks
on America? From Military Times:
Excerpt:
Veterans doubt value of wars in Iraq, Afghanistan in new poll
Most veterans believe the wars in
Iraq and Afghanistan were not worth fighting, and a majority also view U.S. military efforts in Syria as too costly
in dollars and casualties, according to a new poll from the Pew Research
Center released Wednesday.
In a survey of nearly 1,300
veterans conducted in May and June, 64
percent of those surveyed said the war in Iraq was not worth fighting, as
opposed to just 33 percent who said the security benefits outweighed the
sacrifices. For Afghanistan, 58 percent of veterans said that
fight was not worthwhile, versus 38 percent who believed it was. Results
from both questions closely track with the opinions of the American public at
large.
Trump: Pentagon leaders want to keep troops in Afghanistan
The commander in chief said he wants to end the 19-year-old war,
but also worries that may allow terrorist groups to attack the United States.
More veterans also had a negative view of U.S. involvement in Syria (55
percent) than a positive view (42 percent). Pew Research officials said the
rate of support for each of the conflicts did not change significantly for
veterans’ different eras of service, military rank or combat exposure. More than 4,500 U.S. service members have
died in Iraq since the start of combat there in 2003, and more
than 2,400 have been killed in the nearly 18-year-old fighting in Afghanistan…
A Military Times survey of active-duty troops conducted last fall found
that about 45 percent worry that the United States will be drawn into
another major military conflict soon. But more than half of that group
saw Iraq and Afghanistan as little to no threat to American national security
today.
Among the veterans polled by Pew Research officials, more approved of
Trump’s dealings with North Korea (60 percent) and Russia (54 percent) than
oppose his recent outreach.
And Trump also received strong
support for his tough talk with NATO allies, whom he has accused of not
contributing enough resources to global anti-terrorism and security efforts. More than half (54 percent) said they
approve of his handling of those traditional American alliances.
Yes 45 percent of active-duty troops are worried that the US
will be drawn into another “major conflict” in addition to the ones that they
already feel are “not worth it.” They
have good reason to worry, especially since the neocons want Trump to hand over
decisions of war and peace to the “terrorist-funding,
repressive regime in Saudi Arabia.” In the recent debate of the “Deep State
approved” Democratic Presidential Candidates not one of them expressed any
concern over these wars based on lies.
None of them have any concern over risking more American lives in wars
for the CIA/MI6/Mossad lies.
The only candidate that has concerns over turning the
American military over to the Saudi regime is Tulsi Gabbard, who was not
allowed on the stage for the debates.
Gabbard has been blacklisted by the CIA controlled media. After all, as Goebbels said “. It thus becomes vitally important for the
State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal
enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the
State.” From Veterans Today:
Excerpt:
Tulsi Gabbard to Trump: We are not your “prostitutes”
Regardless of your political views,
you should all agree with Gabbard that Trump is acting like Saudi Arabia’s
“bitch…”
Rep. Tulsi Gabbard has recently
grabbed Donald Trump by the balls and told him something that he was obviously
not expecting. “My fellow service
members and I, we are not your prostitutes,” Gabbard said in response to
Trump’s huffing and puffing about more wars in the Middle East for Saudi Arabia
and Israel. “You are not our pimp.”
The congresswoman was just getting
started. She moved on to say:
“Mr. President, as you know, I have
never engaged in hateful rhetoric against you or your family and I never will.
But your offering our military assets to
the dictator of Saudi Arabia to use as he sees fit is a betrayal of my brothers
and sisters in uniform who are ready to give our lives for our country…”
Gabbard continued: “Offering to place our military assets
under the command of a foreign country—Saudi Arabia—is a disgrace and betrayal
of my patriotic brothers and sisters in uniform and to our Constitution…
Trump awaits instructions from his Saudi masters. Having our country act as
Saudi Arabia’s bitch is not “America First.”
As I have argued in the past, it is
somewhat premature to formulate a complete opinion on Gabbard, but she has said
the right thing so far. In fact, her
record is far better than numerous presidents, both past and present.
As we have documented in the past,
Gabbard is an Iraq war veteran, and she
knew what happened to her fellow soldiers who died for Israel, the Neocon war
machine, and the military industrial complex. She also seems to be aware
that the war in Iraq alone will cost American taxpayers at least six trillion
dollars. She is almost certainly aware
of the fact that at least “360,000
Iraq and Afghanistan veterans may have suffered brain injuries.”
Gabbard is smart enough to realize that the Neocon path leads to death,
chaos, and destruction. She knows that virtually nothing good has come out
of the Israeli narrative in the Middle East—a narrative which has brought
America on the brink of collapse in the Middle East. Therefore, she is asking
for a U-turn.
The first step for change, she says, is to “stand up against powerful
politicians from both parties” who take their orders from the Neocons and war
machine. These people don’t care about you, me, the average American, the
people in the Middle East, or the American economy for that matter. They only
care about fulfilling a diabolical ideology in the Middle East and much of the
world.
These people ought to stop once and
for all. Regardless of your political views, you should all agree with Gabbard that Trump is acting like Saudi
Arabia’s “bitch.”
Yes, the 18th anniversary of the “big lie” that
allowed the Zionist regime to overthrow the American government and launch the
New World Order has passed. Who blew up World Trade Center and the
Pentagon ~ nineteen guys with box cutters or the CIA/Mossad/MI6 cabal? 18 years after the 911 attacks on America,
the terrorists behind the attacks now control the levers of power in
America. The only hope for America and
the world lies with the American people.
Are they up to the task? Will
they take off their blinders and take back their country?
President Donald Trump campaigned on a platform of populism
and ending useless wars based on the lies concocted in the bowels of the State
Department and Pentagon by the CIA/Mossad and MI6. Trump has been at war with these neocons that
have infested his Administration.
In the Democratic field of candidates for president, with
the exception of Tulsi Gabbard, there is no opposition to the CIA/MI6/Mossad
agenda, and Tulsi is not allowed into the spotlight. Trump is the only force keeping America out
of World War III and as things look now, he will be reelected.
In order for the world to move on and embrace a world of
peace and prosperity the question must be answered “Who blew up World Trade
Center and the Pentagon ~ nineteen guys with box cutters or the CIA/Mossad/MI6
cabal?” The Big Lie must be put to rest
and the perpetrators of these crimes against humanity must be brought to
justice.
The question is can Trump do it? If he does he will have the support of the
American people and the world. It’s
time the American people realize that the official explanation of how 911
happened is something that “nobody in their right mind would believe.”
No comments:
Post a Comment