“There is nothing which I dread so much as a division of the republic
into two great parties, each arranged under its leader, and concerting measures
in opposition to each other. This, in my humble apprehension, is to be dreaded
as the greatest political evil under our Constitution.” ~ John Adams
The confirmation hearings to seat Brett Kavanaugh on the
highest court in America have awakened a sleeping giant. The hearings to seat the highly partisan,
ultra-right wing Federalist Society’s choice for a life-long position on the
high court sent the two corrupt parties scurrying to their partisan sides bracing
for a brutal fight on behalf of the billionaire, campaign contributors they
serve.
The credible charges of sexual assault during the 1980’s
brought against Kavanaugh by a high school acquaintance have ripped a scab off
the wounds of sexual assault victims, both male and female who have buried
their horrific memories for decades.
Unfortunately for years and especially during the 1980’s, the victims of
sexual assault were shamed into silence.
The Kavanaugh hearings have unearthed those latent wounds and shown the
bright klieg lights on America’s hidden shame of marginalizing sexual assault
thus ripping the nation apart.
During the testimony by Ford and Kavanaugh, the two-parties’
politically charged reactions to the allegations and their often times flippant
and hostile treatment of the witnesses served only to further enrage people on all
sides of the spectrum. Partisan talk
radio and cable bobble heads spewed intentionally inaccurate talking points
contrived in various stink tanks for utmost emotional outrage to sway the
public to their respective sides causing even deeper division in the nation.
We no longer have a functioning government and all positions
that are filled through the confirmation process are filled by equally corrupt,
partisan hacks. The two-party system is
unresponsive to the American people and serves only the globalists who
installed them in power. Following the
Supreme Court’s partisan decisions in Citizens United and in repealing Civil
Rights Era laws enacted to protect the rights of minorities, money has flooded
into the electoral process drowning out the voices of the people.
The two-parties cower in fear of the very intelligence
agencies they are constitutionally required to monitor and rein in. The behemoth Homeland Security Agency that
they created is an extraconstitutional monster that has irreparably destroyed
the American form of self-government. I
fear it may be too late and too far gone for America to survive, but then again
that was the plan all along.
The Kavanaugh hearings have revealed the ugly reality that
the two parties are not interested in vetting nominees sent to them, not by the
President but by various stink tanks with a preordained agenda to further
destroy the American system of government.
The parties dutifully take their sides, sparring for the cameras and
then in the end confirm the highly compromised individual before them on behalf
of their financial benefactors.
It is all a grotesque show, a display that is designed to
tell the American people “f” you, we don’t serve you, we don’t care about you,
we will do whatever we are told to do by our overlords in spite of you. Is it any wonder that people in America and
the world are clamoring for a populist agenda, something the two parties abhor?
The people overwhelmingly support social programs, clean air
and clean water, safe food and products, safe infrastructure, regulated banks, good
paying jobs, decent educational opportunity and healthcare for all. These are all things that the majority on the
high court seeks to destroy. In the end it
doesn’t matter, the politicians serve only their corporate and financial overlords. There is no difference between the
parties. From Caitlin Johnstone at
Consortium News:
Excerpt:
Extremists Unite to Diss Populism as Threat to Democracy
If there’s one thing that brings a
tear to my eye, it’s the inspiration I
feel when watching Republican-aligned neoconservatives and Democrat-aligned
neoconservatives find a way to bridge their almost nonexistent differences and
come together to discuss the many, many, many, many, many, many many many
things they have in common.
In a conference at the Gerald R.
Ford School of Public Policy, “Resistance”
leader and professional left-puncher Neera Tanden met with Iraq-raping neocon
Bill Kristol to discuss bipartisanship and shared values. While leprechauns
held hands and danced beneath candy rainbows and gumdrop Reaper drones, the duo
engaged in a friendly, playful conversation with the event’s host in a debate
format which was not unlike watching the Pillsbury Doughboy have a pillow fight
with himself in a padded room after drinking a bottle of NyQuil.
To get the event started, the host
whose name I refuse to learn asked the pair
to discuss briefly what common ground such wildly different people could
possibly share to make such a strange taboo-shattering dialogue possible.
“Issues around national security
and believing in democratic principles as they relate to foreign policy,” replied Tanden. “And opposing
authoritarianism, and opposing the kind
of creeping populism that undermines democracy itself...”
Kristol co-signed Tanden’s anti-populist rhetoric and her open
endorsement of neoconservative foreign policy, and went on to say that
another thing he and Tanden have in common is that they’ve both served in
government. That makes you realize that nothing’s black and white and
everything’s kinda nebulous and amorphous so it doesn’t really matter if you, say for example, help deceive your
country into a horrific blunder that ends up killing a whole lot of people for
no good reason…
“I do think if you’ve served in
government… that you do have somewhat
more of a sense of the complexity of things, and many of its decisions are
not black and white, that in public policy there are plusses and minuses to
most policies,” Kristol said. “There are authentic disagreements both about
values, but also just about how certain things are gonna work or not work… and
that is what adds a kind of humility to
one’s belief that one is kind of always right about everything.”
I found this very funny coming from
the man who is notoriously always wrong about everything, and I’d like to point
out that “complexity” is a key talking
point that the neoconservatives who’ve been consistently proven completely
wrong about everything are fond of repeating.
Everything’s complicated and
nothing’s really known and it’s all a
big blurry mess so maybe butchering a million Iraqis and destabilizing the
Middle East was a good thing. Check out this short clip of John Bolton
being confronted by Tucker Carlson about what a spectacular error the Iraq
invasion was for a great example of this:
I listened to the whole conference,
but it was basically one long smear of amicable politeness which was the verbal
equivalent of the color beige, so I had difficulty tuning in. Both
Tanden and Kristol hate the far left (or as those of us outside the U.S.
pronounce it, “the center”), both Tanden and Kristol hate Trump, and
hey maybe Americans have a lot more in common than they think and everyone can
come together and together together togetherness blah blah.
At one point Kristol said something about disagreeing with internet censorship,
which was weird because his Weekly Standard actively participates in
Facebook censorship as one of its authorized “fact checkers”.
The buzzword “bipartisan” gets used
a lot in U.S. politics because it gives the
illusion that whatever agenda it’s being applied to must have some deep
universal truth to it for such wildly divergent ideologies to set aside their
differences in order to advance it. But what it usually means is Democrat neocons and Republican neocons
working together to inflict new horrors upon the world.
America’s two mainstream political parties agree furiously with one another
on war, neoliberalism, Orwellian surveillance, and every other agenda which increases the power and profit of the
plutocratic class which owns them both. The plutocrat-owned mass
media plays up the differences between Democrats and Republicans to hysterical
proportions, when in reality the
debate over which one is worse is like arguing over whether a serial killer’s
arms or legs are more evil.
Neera Tanden and Bill Kristol are the same fucking person. They’re
both toxic limbs on the same toxic beast, feeding
the lives of ordinary people at home and abroad into its gaping mouth in
service of the powerful. And populism, which is nothing other than support
for the protection of common folk from the powerful, is the only antidote to
such toxins. Saying populism undermines democracy is like saying democracy
undermines democracy.
Amen, I now know why Caitlin Johnstone is fast becoming my
favorite writers. The Kavanaugh hearings
are just a side show to lull the American people into believing there is a
vetting process for justices who serve on the highest court for the rest of
their lives. There’s not. The justices are selected for their past
service to the Deep State and unwavering fealty. Laughingly we are told these partisans are
“contextualists” they are “conservatives” or even “Constitutionalists” when
they are anything but.
“Blind party loyalty
will be our downfall. We must follow the truth wherever it leads.”
~ DaShanne Stokes
Anyone from either party who questions the character or
judicial temperance of the candidate is shot down and minimalized for even
questioning the motives of the stink tank selected lackey as Republican Justin
Amash found out. From The Hill:
Excerpt:
GOP Rep. Amash slams Kavanaugh on government surveillance rulings
Rep. Justin Amash (R-Mich.) on
Monday called President Trump Supreme
Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh a “disappointing pick,” ripping the judge’s
past rulings on surveillance issues. The
congressman cited a 2015 opinion written by Kavanaugh while serving on the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, that found “the Government’s metadata collection program is entirely
consistent with the Fourth Amendment.”
Amash disagreed with that ruling,
saying it creates “a rubber stamp for
the executive branch.” “Future
decisions on the constitutionality of government surveillance of Americans will
be huge. We can’t afford a rubber stamp for the executive branch,” Amash
tweeted. He also included a quote from Kavanaugh’s opinion in the case, stating
“that critical national security need outweighs the impact on privacy
occasioned by this program.”
Kavanaugh had written the concurring opinion in 2015, rejecting a
request to rehear a case on whether the National Security Agency’s program on
warrantless phone metadata collection was legal. Trump on Monday tapped Kavanaugh to replace
retiring Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy.
Conservatives have largely applauded the appointment, while some
prominent Democrats, including Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.),
have vowed to oppose the pick.
Amash is not the only GOP lawmaker
to have been critical of Kavanaugh's past rulings. Republican Sen. Rand Paul (Ky.) has also been
a critic of some of Kavanaugh's past rulings on surveillance. After the announcement of Kavanaugh as the
nominee Monday, Paul said he would
review the pick with “an open mind.”
When Senator Rand Paul says he will view the nominee with
“an open mind” he means he will toe the line. What kind of “open mind” must you have to
consider voting to put someone who defies the Constitution of the United States
on the Supreme Court for the rest of his life?
Judge Napolitano succinctly described Kavanaugh’s anti-Constitution
rulings on the court he serves.
There are many, many reasons to reject Brett Kavanaugh for
the Supreme Court, and many, many questions that should be asked by the two
parties, but won’t be asked, not by Republicans and not by Democrats. Why won’t they at least ask? From Mother Jones:
Excerpt:
The Many Mysteries of Brett Kavanaugh’s Finances
Who made the down payment on his
house? How did he come up with $92,000 in country club fees?
Before President Donald Trump
nominated Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court, he had a lot of debt. In May 2017, he reported owing between
$60,004 and $200,000 on three credit cards and a loan against his retirement
account. By the time Trump nominated him to the high court in July 2018,
those debts had vanished.
Overall, his reported income and
assets didn’t seem sufficient to pay off all that debt while maintaining his
upper-class lifestyle: an expensive house in an exclusive suburban neighborhood, two kids in a $10,500-a-year private
school, and a membership in a posh country club reported to charge $92,000 in
initiation fees. His financial disclosure forms have raised more questions than
they’ve answered, leading to speculation about whether he’s had a private benefactor and what sorts of conflicts that
relationship might entail.
No other recent Supreme Court
nominee has come before the Senate with so many unanswered questions regarding
finances. That’s partly because many of Kavanaugh’s predecessors were
a lot richer than he is. Chief Justice John Roberts, for instance, had been
making $1 million a year in private practice before joining the DC Circuit as a
judge.
The poorer nominees had debts, but
explainable ones, such as the $15,000 Sonia Sotomayor owed to her dentist. Neil Gorsuch came the closest to
financial scandal when he disclosed that he owned a mountain fishing lodge in
Colorado with two men who are top deputies to the billionaire Philip F. Anschutz, who had championed
Gorsuch’s nomination.
Kavanaugh’s finances are far more
mysterious. During his confirmation hearing last week, he escaped a public discussion
of his spending habits because no senator asked about it. But on
Tuesday, Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), a member of the Senate Judiciary
Committee, sent Kavanaugh 14 pages of post-hearing follow-up questions, many of
which involved his finances. On Thursday, Kavanaugh supplied answers, but he
dodged some of the questions and left much of his financial situation
unexplained.
A number of the questions
Whitehouse sent Kavanaugh dealt with the house he bought in tony Chevy Chase,
Maryland, in 2006 for $1.225 million. Kavanaugh would have needed $245,000 in
cash for the traditional 20 percent down payment on the house. But in 2005,
when his nomination to the DC Circuit was pending, Kavanaugh reported a total
net worth to the Senate of about $91,000, which reflected a mere $10,000 in the
bank and $25,000 in credit card debt. According
to his financial disclosure forms before and after the purchase of his house in
2006, Kavanaugh’s liquid assets and bank balances never totaled more than
$65,000, and those balances didn’t decline after the purchase of the house…
Other questions from Whitehouse
addressed Kavanaugh’s unusual debt
history. Not long after Trump nominated him, the Washington Post reported
that since joining the DC Circuit Court of Appeals as a judge in 2006, Kavanaugh had run up a significant
amount of debt that often appeared to exceed the value of his cash and
investment assets. His debts on three credit cards, as well as a loan
against his retirement account, totaled between $60,000 and $200,000
in 2016, according to his financial disclosure forms. The next year, his debts vanished…
The White House didn’t fully
address how Kavanaugh managed to incur all that debt and pay it off in a matter
of months on his federal judge’s salary of $220,600 a year. (His wife left the
workforce in 2010 and returned in 2015,
when she took a part-time, $66,000-a-year job as the town manager in
their village of 225 homes.)…
(Kavanaugh worked in private practice for only about three years,
in between stints at the office of the independent counsel during the
Clinton administration.)… (Kavanaugh had
a privileged, private-school upbringing as the son of a Washington lobbyist for the cosmetics industry and a state
prosecutor.)…
The White House has worked hard to frame Kavanaugh as a mainstream
fellow who, just like ordinary American dads, loves sports and drives the
carpool. Publicly disclosing the extent to which his parents or in-laws may be
subsidizing his high-end lifestyle could probably undermine that portrayal.
Hmm, “no other recent Supreme Court nominee has come before
the Senate with so many unanswered questions regarding finances.” The only justice that came close was the
Federalist Society’s nominee “Neil Gorsuch” who was championed by billionaire
“Philip F. Anschutz” whose two deputies own a mountain fishing lodge along with
Gorsuch in Colorado. That seems really
“fishy” to me. Who is this billionaire
Anschutz who championed Gorsuch? Well
according to an article in Salon:
“Anschutz,
whose business empire ranges from real estate and telecommunications to
railroads and oil and gas, is first known to have been connected to Gorsuch in
the early 2000s, when Gorsuch represented both Anschutz and his companies as an
outside counsel from the firm Kellogg Huber, according to The New York Times. Given Anschutz's ownership of
conservative publications like The Weekly Standard and The Washington Examiner,
it is quite likely that he shares a sense of ideological kinship with Gorsuch,
who has long been on the conservative end of the political spectrum.”
Interesting that Anschultz owns the conservative rag “The
Weekly Standard” home to the “Iraq-raping neocon” Bill Kristol. Anschultz’ Weekly Standard has been hired by
Facebook to censor its content. That is
what our Supreme Court has become, it’s truly disgraceful:
With a fascist the problem is never how best to present the truth to
the public but how best to use the news
to deceive the public into giving the fascist and his group more money or
more power... They claim to be super-patriots, but they would destroy every
liberty guaranteed by the Constitution. They
demand free enterprise, but are the spokesmen for monopoly and vested interest.
Their final objective, toward which all their deceit is directed, is to capture
political power so that, using the power of the state and the power of the
market simultaneously, they may keep the common man in eternal subjection. ~
Henry A. Wallace
So how well does the Supreme Court work when it’s packed
with justices whose life-long seats on the high court were bought by
billionaires with cases slotted to come before it? Is the court truly nonpartisan calling balls
and strikes fairly? From Chuck Baldwin
at Lew Rockwell:
Excerpt:
He Blew It!
Donald Trump was elected President on the promise that he
would drain the swamp and dismantle the Deep State. And many conservatives
and Christians thoroughly believe that Trump is actually doing what he
promised. But is he? I think not.
Donald Trump had one chance to prove that he was serious about draining
the swamp and dismantling the Deep State. ONE CHANCE. That one chance was
his first two years in office. AND HE
BLEW IT.
Trump appointed more Deep State CFR members and Bilderbergers
(including Neil Gorsuch, James Mattis, John Bolton, et al.) to his
administration than Barack Obama. And don’t be taken in by all of the political
bickering surrounding Trump’s Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.
The conservatives’ defense of
Kavanaugh is as irrelevant as the liberals’ accusations against Kavanaugh… In addition (and more relevant to the 9/11
discussion), Trump brought Deep State warlock, Rudy Giuliani, to the White
House. As Mayor of New York City, Giuliani, more than any other single
individual, provided cover for the real
attackers of 9/11 by overseeing the
massive effort of destroying the evidence from that horrific crime scene.
Rudy Giuliani is the quintessential
Deep State operative. The criminals who
masterminded and carried out the 9/11 attacks could not have succeeded without
the help of Rudy Giuliani. He was a major player in 9/11. Yet, Trump brings this conscienceless Deep
State puppet into the White House and gives him one of the most trusted
positions in his government.
Had Trump been serious about
draining the swamp and dismantling the Deep State, he would have begun immediately after being inaugurated exposing the
major Deep State players from both parties (including the Clintons, Bushes,
Dick Cheney, Giuliani, Michael Chertoff, etc.) and from the alphabet
agencies that have millions of skeletons (literally) in their bloody closets.
But instead of exposing them, Trump continued to cover for them or even HIRE
them.
But instead of hiring Deep State
toadies like Giuliani, Trump should have
created an independent commission to thoroughly investigate 9/11. If he had
been serious about dismantling the Deep State, that is exactly what he would
have done. But he didn’t; and he won’t. He won’t because Trump is determined to
keep the crimes of the Deep State covered up…
From this point on, it doesn’t matter
to a tinker’s dam what Trump does or doesn’t do, as he has proven that he
either didn’t mean a word he said while campaigning or didn’t have the man
stuff to actually follow through with what he promised. From now on, Trump will be simply dancing the famous Potomac Two-Step
all over Washington, D.C…
Folks, let this sink in: the Deep State has nothing to do with
partisan politics. It has nothing to do with the entire left-right
political wrangling, name calling, posturing, etc., that consumes the mainstream
media. All of that is nothing but public theater to distract the American
people from what is really going on—OR NOT going on.
Donald Trump had one chance to prove he was serious about draining the
swamp and dismantling the Deep State: his first two years in office. And
the 17th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks serves as just another reminder that HE BLEW IT!..
We have been bamboozled, folks. Everything we’ve been told about
9/11 and the “War on Terror” is a big fat LIE…
If enough of the American people
could come to grips with the truth about 9/11 and the “War on Terror,” it would
change the course of history, save thousands and even millions of lives and,
yes, save our republic. As it is, the
deception of 9/11 and the “War on Terror” envelops both political parties in
Washington, D.C., including Donald Trump—and even America’s pastors and
churches.
Sad, but true. There
are VERY FEW in our government that give a rip about the American people. Most are there to perpetuate the myth of 911
and to protect the perpetrators embedded in our government as well as other
governments. There is one bright light
in the congress and that is Senator Sheldon Whitehouse. Whitehouse knows that Kavanaugh hearing is a
sham. Excerpts from Whitehouse’s openingstatement before the Kavanaugh hearing.
Excerpt:
Whitehouse Reveals Kavanaugh’s Pro-Corporate, Right-Wing Record in
SCOTUS Hearing Opener
Washington, DC — At
today’s Senate Judiciary
Committee hearing for Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, Senator Sheldon
Whitehouse (D-RI) pinpointed Kavanaugh’s
troubling bias in favor of right-wing and corporate interests throughout his
career in Republican politics and on the federal bench, and compared
Kavanaugh’s partiality to the same bias that has taken root in Chief Justice
John Roberts’s Supreme Court…
A review of the Supreme Court’s
jurisprudence during the Roberts Era reveals that in the most controversial and salient civil cases — those
decided by bare 5–4 or 5–3 majorities — when
the right wing of the Court has voted en bloc to form the majority, they do
so to advance far-right and corporate interests a striking 92 percent of the
time.
In those cases, the “Roberts Five” — Chief
Justice John Roberts, Justice Samuel Alito, Justice Clarence Thomas, Justice
Anthony Kennedy, and Justice Antonin Scalia (replaced last year by Justice Neil
Gorsuch) — have
reliably voted in lockstep to help Republicans win elections, to protect
corporations from liability, to abridge civil rights, and to advance the
far right social agenda.
A review of Brett Kavanaugh’s
jurisprudence on the D.C. Circuit reveals that in the most controversial and
salient civil cases — those
decided by bare 2–1 majorities — when
Kavanaugh is in the majority with another Republican-appointed judge, he votes to advance far-right and corporate
interests a striking 91 percent of the time…
Further, in these cases, the
Roberts Five has endorsed the positions advanced by the high-profile
conservative groups the Chamber of Commerce, the Criminal Justice Legal
Foundation, and the Washington Legal Foundation 100 percent of the time. In
its 5–4 decisions, the Roberts Five have
opened up the doors for dark money to flood the political system, rolled back
important voting rights and environmental protections, and made it easier
for employers to discriminate against their employees…
An examination of District of
Columbia Court of Appeals Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s written opinions reveals that
he sided with conservative amici curiae (“friends of the court”) 91 percent of
the time. In these cases, Kavanaugh
wrote opinions limiting collective bargaining rights, letting polluters
pollute, blurring the line between the separation of church and state,
protecting corporations from liability, and expanding the scope of the
Second Amendment…
When the Roberts Five saddles up, THESE SO-CALLED CONSERVATIVES ARE ANYTHING
BUT JUDICIALLY CONSERVATIVE. They
readily overturn precedent, toss out statutes passed by wide bipartisan margins,
and decide on broad constitutional issues they need not reach. Modesty, originalism, stare decisis, all
these supposedly conservative judicial principles, all have the hoof prints of
the Roberts Five all across their backs, wherever those principles got
in the way of wins for the Big Republican interests.
The litany of Roberts Five
decisions explains why big Republican interests want Kavanaugh on the Court so
badly that Republicans trampled so much
Senate precedent to shove him through; so let’s review the litany…
Here’s how the rigged game works: big business and partisan groups fund the
Federalist Society, which picked Gorsuch and now Kavanaugh... big business and partisan groups fund the
Judicial Crisis Network, which runs dark-money political campaigns to influence
Senators in confirmation votes, as they’ve done for Gorsuch and now
Kavanaugh. Who pays millions of
dollars for that, and what their expectations are, is a deep dark secret…
The sad fact is that there is no consequence for telling
the Committee fairy tales about stare decisis, and then riding off with the
Roberts Five, trampling across whatever precedent gets in the way of letting
those Big Republican interests keep winning 5–4 partisan decisions.
Every. Damned. Time.
Well not to worry America, we have an opposition party of
fighters. The Democrats are going to
join together as a bloc and stop the confirmation of another right-wing,
partisan hack with an anti-Constitution agenda.
The people have a Constitutional warrior in the Democratic Party, there
will be no backing down. From SplinterNews:
Excerpt:
DNC Chair Gives the Thumbs-Up to Any Democrats Who Might Vote for
Kavanaugh
There is absolutely no reason—political, moral, strategic, you
name it—for any Democrat to vote to confirm Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme
Court. There are plenty of good reasons for Democrats to vote against
Kavanaugh, starting with the very basic one that a far-right partisan who
has been credibly accused of multiple incidents of sexual assault should
not be let anywhere near the Supreme Court.
It’s also pretty stupid, when your
party is trying to harness the energy of a hyper-mobilized base fueled by women
and people of color, to have members of
your party stick their necks out for a man who has become the ultimate symbol
of elite, white, patriarchal anger and entitlement.
But don’t tell that to Democratic
National Committee chairman Tom Perez! In an onstage interview with Wall Street
Journal reporter Reid Epstein at the Texas Tribune Festival in Austin on Friday, Perez was asked whether he thought it was acceptable for a Democrat to vote
for Kavanaugh. After some hemming and hawing, he finally gave his answer: sure!..
Again! Let me stress! At this point,
voting against Brett Kavanaugh should be
the most basic thing possible for anyone calling themselves a Democrat!
This was true before his Senate hearing, but voting to confirm him after that
hellish frenzy of male disgust at the mere idea of female power should get you
run out of town instantly! When you say that it’s fine for Democrats to back
him, you are saying that the rage and anguish and fear that people—especially
women—feel about his potential confirmation is meaningless to you! This is not
complicated!!!
As long as Democrats like Tom Perez keep selling out their voters like
this, they will keep sending the message that there is no reason to trust
them with anything.
The confirmation hearings to seat Brett Kavanaugh on the
highest court in America for the rest of his life have awakened a sleeping
giant. While the American people clamor
for a populist agenda, the corrupt two-parties continue to pursue unending war
as they allow America to disintegrate and fall into disrepair and neglect. We no
longer have a functioning government and all positions that are filled through
the confirmation process are filled by equally corrupt, politically partisan
hacks.
The two-party system is corrupt and unresponsive to the
American people and serve only the globalists who installed them in our
government. The government that rules us
is not elected by the people, it is elected by money. The awakened Sleeping Giant can’t find its
way out of the darkness that has enveloped the world while he slept.
Unless in the unlikely event Donald Trump withdraws
Kavanaugh’s nomination he will be confirmed.
The Supreme Court is already tainted and horribly corrupted just like
the rest of our government. For America
there are no do-overs, no atonement for the sins of the two-party system, just
the continued death knoll for “of, by and for the people government.” I fear it is too late for the American
people, but I must believe that our Democracy can withstand this fascist
takeover. God, I hope so.
