Ding dong the EU/NATO witch is dead. The cabal that overthrew the U.S. Government in 2000 has had a long run laying waste not only to America but countries around the world. US Senate Republicans in concert with Senate Democrats stopped the rightful winner of the 2000 election from taking office and installed George W. Bush. From Miller Center:
Excerpt:
George W. Bush - Americans
votes in the 2000 presidential election. Vote differentials in several states
are exceedingly close, with the Democratic and Republican candidates disputing
many of those counts, leaving the final result inconclusive. November 07, 2000.
George W. Bush - 12/12/2000: In
a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court stops the recount of votes in several
contested Florida counties. The Democratic candidate, Vice President Albert
Gore Jr., concedes the election, leaving Governor George W. Bush of Texas, the
Republican candidate, as President-elect. December 12, 2000
December
15, 2000, just three days after an extremely partisan and ideological Supreme
Court stepped in and stopped the recount of votes cast in Florida, the U.S.
Senate passed the Graham Leach Bliley Bill that deregulated derivatives
trading, insurance companies and banking.
No more meddlesome usury laws.
Oh,
life was good for rightwing extremists.
They not only had control of the governments of the U.S. and Britain,
but they controlled all news media in both countries. C-Span became the mouthpiece of these
extremists making every wild accusation against Saddam Hussein imaginable to
justify the Iraq war. No accusation was
too extreme when made by members of the Heritage Foundation, American
Enterprise Institute, Cato Institute, Rand Corporation and all the think tanks
that control the agenda of C-Span.
Excerpt:
The
Gore Commission Demanded Tougher Airline Security, But Airlines And Conservatives
Said No: Janet Hessert
"The
federal government should consider aviation security as a national security
issue, and provide substantial funding for capital improvements. The Commission
believes that terrorist attacks on civil aviation are directed at the United
States, and that there should be an ongoing federal commitment to reducing the
threats that they pose."
Gore
Commission final report, February 12, 1997
…And the airlines made sure their views
on costly anti-terrorism regulations were heard on Capitol Hill. The industry
had contributed to the 1995-96 campaigns of 10 of the 12 members on the House
Appropriations subcommittee on transportation - - the committee that funds the
FAA. The Senate Aviation Subcommittee had similar ties to the airline industry:
eight of nine Republican senators serving on that subcommittee in 1996 had
received airline PAC contributions; only one of the eight Democrats on that
subcommittee did.
Excerpt:
They went to great pains not to sound as
though they were telling the president “We told you so.”
But on Wednesday, two former senators,
the bipartisan co-chairs of a Defense Department-chartered commission on
national security, spoke with something between frustration and regret about
how White House officials failed to embrace any of the recommendations to
prevent acts of domestic terrorism delivered earlier this year.
Bush administration officials told former
Sens. Gary Hart, D-Colo., and Warren Rudman, R-N.H., that they preferred
instead to put aside the recommendations issued in the January report by the
U.S. Commission on National Security/21st Century. Instead, the White House
announced in May that it would have Vice President Dick Cheney study the
potential problem of domestic terrorism—which the bipartisan group had already
spent two and a half years studying—while assigning responsibility for dealing
with the issue to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, headed by former
Bush campaign manager Joe Allbaugh…
Yes,
the Bush/Cheney Administration chose to ignore the two years of work of the
bipartisan Hart/Rudman Commission and put “Vice President” Cheney and Bush’s
“campaign manager” in charge of a new study.
Before the White House decided to go in
its own direction, Congress seemed to be taking the commission's suggestions
seriously, according to Hart and Rudman. “Frankly, the White House shut it
down,” Hart says. “The president said 'Please wait, we're going to turn this
over to the vice president. We believe FEMA is competent to coordinate this
effort.' And so Congress moved on to
other things, like tax cuts and the issue of the day.”
“We predicted it,” Hart says of Tuesday's
horrific events. “We said Americans will likely die on American soil, possibly
in large numbers—that's a quote [from the commission's Phase One Report] from
the fall of 1999.”....
Richard
Clark, the counter-terrorism czar, said the threats were so great and urgent
that he felt like his hair was on fire.
Clark personally traveled to Crawford, Texas where Bush was on vacation,
to deliver a verbal and well as written Presidential Daily Briefing of the
threat. That later came to be known as
the August 6th Presidential Daily Briefing. From Salon:
Excerpt:
Ron
Suskind’s “The One Percent Doctrine” is out this week, and the Washington
Post’s Barton Gellman says it’s full of “jaw-dropping stories” about the Bush
administration’s war on terror.
Or
lack thereof.
We’ve
known for years now that George W. Bush received a presidential daily briefing
on Aug. 6, 2001, in which he was warned: “Bin Laden Determined to Strike in
U.S.” We’ve known for almost as long that Bush went fishing afterward.
What
we didn’t know is what happened in between the briefing and the fishing, and
now Suskind is here to tell us. Bush listened to the briefing, Suskind says,
then told the CIA briefer: “All right. You’ve covered your ass, now.”
Excerpt:
George
W. Bush - 01/22/2001: In
one of his first policy decisions, President Bush decides to reinstate the ban
on aid to international groups performing or counseling on abortion. The
ban was initiated by former President Ronald Reagan but is not enforced during
the administration of President Bill Clinton. January 22, 2001
George
W. Bush - 01/29/2001: By
executive order, President Bush creates the Office of Faith-Based and Community
Initiatives. The new office will work to
ease regulations on religious charities and promote grass-roots efforts to
tackle community issues such as aid to the poor and disadvantaged. January 29,
2001
George
W. Bush - 02/16/2001:
United States airplanes attack Iraqi radar sites to enforce a “no-fly zone.”
Bush calls the military action a “routine mission.” February 16, 2001…
Bush/Cheney
came into office with an ideological “faith based” agenda as well as an agenda
to remove Saddam Hussein and take over the Iraqi oil fields. But the signature accomplishment of the Bush
Administration were tax cuts for the rich to the tune of almost $1.5 trillion
dollars.
George W. Bush - 06/07/2001: President Bush
signs a $1.35 trillion tax cut into law. Although the amount falls short of the
$1.60 trillion the administration has been seeking, the bill does slash income
tax rates across the board and provides for the gradual elimination of the
estate tax. June 07, 2001
So
the Bush/Cheney Administration installed their ideological “Project for a new
American Century” pals in the highest levels of government, particularly the
State Department. When the Bush/Cheney
cabal named John Negroponte as United Nations Ambassador, the U.S. was kicked
off the Human Rights Council of the UN.
Negroponte had overseen the death squads in Honduras in the Reagan Administration. From De Rechos:
Excerpt:
John Negroponte was ambassador to
Honduras from 1981-1985. As such he supported and carried out a US-sponsored
policy of violations to human rights and international law. Among other things
he supervised the creation of the El Aguacate air base, where the US trained
Nicaraguan Contras during the 1980's. The base was used as a secret detention
and torture center, in August 2001 excavations at the base discovered the first
of the corpses of the 185 people, including two Americans, who are thought to
have been killed and buried at this base.
During his ambassadorship, human rights
violations in Honduras became systematic. The infamous Battalion 316, trained
by the CIA and Argentine military, kidnaped, tortured and killed hundreds of
people. Negroponte knew about these human rights violations and yet continued
to collaborate with them, while lying to Congress.
President George W. Bush has nominated
Negroponte to be US ambassador before the UN. Human Rights organizations in the US and Latin America have joined
their voices in asking the US Senate to not ratify his nomination.
So
many moons later, the “New American Century” is a proven failure that caused
untold horror and death to hundreds of thousands of people in the U.S., Libya,
Iraq, Afghanistan, Georgia, Gaza, the West Bank, Ukraine, Syria, Somalia, and
on and on.
The
Federal Reserve Bank and their handmaiden the European Central Bank, along with
the United States Senate have systematically taken over governments around the
world and subjugated their populations into poverty, hunger, ignorance,
joblessness, homelessness, and destruction.
The damage to the world’s human and ecological system is incalculable.
But, the overthrow of the
elected government of Ukraine was one regime change too many. The elected leader of Ukraine was removed in
a CIA/State Department coup when he rejected an EU trade deal. From WorldSocialist Web Site:
Excerpt:
Amid intensifying US and European Union
sanctions and military provocations against Russia, the EU and the
Western-backed government in Ukraine yesterday signed a pact that paves the way for brutal austerity measures
and free market “reforms.”
The
EU-Ukraine Association Agreement is based on the deal that former President
Viktor Yanukovych’s Ukrainian government rejected, leading to the US- and
EU-instigated protests and violence that ousted him last month.
The pact, signed in Brussels, declares
that the Ukrainian government must “embark swiftly on an ambitious program of
structural reforms” and submit to “an agreement with the [International
Monetary Fund].” The plans being drawn up are based on the “Greek model”—the
savage cuts imposed on Greece by the IMF and the EU that have produced a
massive growth in unemployment and poverty.
For all their claims of a “democratic
revolution,” the EU leaders and Ukraine’s unelected regime of former bankers,
fascists and oligarchs announced that they would delay finalizing the economic
clauses of the EU association pact—and hence unveiling the austerity
measures—until after elections in May.
The pact is another step toward realising
the underlying objectives of the Ukrainian coup—Ukraine’s integration into the
orbit of the Western powers, the
transformation of the country into a cheap labour platform for global
capitalism and the ratcheting up of economic and strategic pressure on Russia
itself.
Well,
well. “Ding, dong the EU/NATO witch is dead.” The EU/NATO died of an overdose of
hubris. Guess what, the people of the world
have finally had it with their lackey leaders coming down on their lives like a
sledgehammer, while bankers are drowning in a glut of stolen riches.
About 7,000 people marched toward the headquarters of the European Central Bank (ECB) |
So what is the “State of
the European Union?” Let’s take a look,
starting with the European Central Bank/Wall Street. From CNBC:
Excerpt:
Wall Street Shaky on EU
It hasn't been a great year for European
economies. Italy has slid back into a recession. German GDP contracted in the
second quarter, and German finance minister Wolfgang Schaeuble reportedly said
on Thursday that the Eurozone's strongest economy is likely to miss its 1.8
percent growth estimate this year. Across the Eurozone, zero growth was shown
in the second quarter, and recent manufacturing data indicates that the third
quarter may not be much better.
Still, these bad numbers haven't been too
damaging for global risk assets—after all, they have clearly increased the
European Central Bank's appetite to stimulate the economy. But there may be a
limit to how bad Europe can get before bad news becomes bad news once again.
You know what’s funny, the
EU that was created by the “faith based” cabal in the U.S. Government has now
ordered member states to count prostitution, gambling and illegal activity in
their GDP to meet the GDP goals set by the EU.
From LaRouche:
Excerpt:
All
European Union nations that don't already count drugs, prostitution, and other
criminal operations -- legal or not -- in their national GDP figures, will be
required to do so by September, Bloomberg reported June 3.
The 2010 version of the European System
of Accounts is mandatory for EU nations reporting their GDP by September. The
ESA regulations state: “illegal economic actions shall be considered as
transactions when all units involved enter the actions by mutual agreement.
Thus, purchases, sales, or barters of illegal drugs or stolen property are transactions,
while theft is not.”
But Europe's problem may be political
just as much as economic. On the back of the ECB's latest action, worries about
whether the European Union itself can hold may crop up again.
Draghi said on
Thursday that some nations were opposed to the ECB actions, and it has been
reported that German Bundesbank president Jens Weidmann voted against both the
rate cut and the asset purchases. If
tensions between Germany and the ECB fester, and the weaker Eurozone economies
worsen, jitters about an EU breakup may return.
Ouch, jitters about an EU
breakup may return. Dumb asses, they
just got too greedy and Ukraine will be the destruction of the EU and
NATO. The European Central Bank (ECB)
response has been the mirror image of the Federal Reserve’s response in the
US. Bail out Wall Street at the expense
of Main Street. From CNBC:
Excerpt:
The
ECB's triple-interest rate cut and bond-buying announcement surprised investors
on Thursday—and were still sparking debate a day later.
ECB
President Mario Draghi said the council, which includes the central bank chiefs
of each euro zone country, was "un-unanimous" in its decision to cut key
rates to record lows and purchase covered bonds and asset-backed securities—a private-sector version of the quantitative easing practiced
by the U.S. Federal Reserve.
First of all, what the hell
is a “non-unanimous” decision and what in God’s name is a “private-sector
version of the quantitative easing.”
That is staggering. Sounds like
another extremely expensive cheap trick.
The Federal Reserve Bank has been removing trillions of unsecured debt
from the books of Wall Street banks and transferring the debt to the US
taxpayers. So how does a “private-sector
version” work? From CNBC:
Ha ha is this what your bank looks like? |
ECB-watchers were left in the dark as to
which members voted against the measures. However, speculation was rife, as
some countries' central bankers have previously come out as for or against
further easing measures. One vocal critic is German Bundesbank President Jens
Weidmann…
German economists, politicians and
bankers have previously expressed skepticism about asset-buying by the ECB,
mainly because they see it as a means of bolstering profligate southern
European economies at the cost of frugal Germany.
No, German
economists, the asset-buying is bolstering profligate billionaire bankers. Germany has the most to lose, but when the
Federal Reserve holds your gold hostage, there’s not much you can do.
The EU is starting to look
like a parasite feeding off their host nations.
Quantitative easing has been devastating for U.S. particularly in its
failure to create jobs. So how’s the
unemployment rate in the EU? From FoxBusiness News:
Excerpt:
ECB's moves unlikely to
offer struggling Europeans much relief from low pay, high unemployment
WASHINGTON
– For the struggling Spanish shopkeeper or the Portuguese restaurant owner, the
European Central Bank's latest economic stimulus plans won't likely provide
much relief anytime soon. If ever.
Confronting
a stalled economy and painful unemployment across Europe, the ECB is doing what
it can. It surprised economists and investors Thursday by cutting its benchmark
interest rate to a record-low 0.05 percent. And it announced plans to pump
money into the financial system by buying bonds backed by assets such as auto
and credit-card loans.
So, what’s the message the ECB
sends to the unemployed and underemployed?
Drop dead we’re bailing out banks.
And, if that wasn’t devastating enough for the people living in the EU
states, it’s going to get much, much worse.
Russian sanctions against EU’s produce in response to the failed EU
sanctions on Russia, will cause a surplus of perishable goods in the EU.
Excerpt:
Russian sanctions create
surplus of European produce
Russian
sanctions have left farmers in Europe high and dry. If they put their produce
on EU markets, prices would likely crash. So what is to become of this year's
harvest?
Dutch
farmers are not the only
ones having to find new ways to ensure their harvest doesn't go to waste in
light of Russia's sweeping export ban. They need to shift their fruit and
vegetables as quickly as possible, but dumping it on the domestic market would
run the risk of a price collapse.
Greece, which usually ships half of its stone fruit harvest to Russia and is already ailing as
a result of the European economic crisis, stands to be particularly badly
affected by the embargo.
There
are also concerns in Austria, where Maria Sauer of the East Austrian
Farming Association says low prices have producers worried about their
long-term chance of survival. Futures are in jeopardy.
Poland, as the largest apple exporter in the EU
and which also traditionally exports to Russia, has launched a campaign under
the motto: "An apple a day keeps Putin away."
The
most important EU producers of the hard hit fruit are Italy, Spain, France and
Greece. Collectively the union produces some 2.5 million tons of peaches and
1.2 million tons of nectarines annually.
Welcome to the
new world order, starvation, joblessness, homelessness and endless war for profit. All wealth goes to the oligarchs of the US
and EU. So, will the EU help the people
living in member states? Fat
chance.
So let’s take a
look at the “state of the European Union” by member states. Let’s spin the old roulette wheel and see
where it goes. Round, and round and
round, first up the UE State of France:
French President Francois Hollande, right, greets the
President of the European Central Bank, Mario Draghi,
|
Hey
France, so how has life improved for your people since the overthrow of
Ukraine? From International BusinessTimes:
Excerpt:
French
unemployment levels continued to rise in the second quarter, drawing criticism
towards Francois Hollande and his government's job creation programs and
austerity cuts.
Unemployment
rate, gauged based on International Labour Organisation (ILO) standards, edged
up to 10.2% in the second quarter from 10.1% in the first quarter, according to
statistics agency Insee.
The
current rate is close to the 15-year high of 10.3% recorded in the third
quarter of 2013.
Yawza, adjust
those numbers to include the long-term unemployed and underemployed not counted
in the statistic and the rate is about 20%.
So is this acceptable to the French?
From Russia Times:
Excerpt:
Marine
Le Pen, the leader of France’s far-right National Front party, says the EU is
to blame for the crisis in Ukraine as it forced the situation where Kiev had to
choose between East and West…
“The
crisis in Ukraine is all the European Union’s fault. Its leaders negotiated a
trade deal with Ukraine, which essentially blackmailed the country to choose
between Europe and Russia,” Le Pen told Le Monde daily in an interview.
Le
Pen has been a long-standing critic of Europe’s foreign policy and does not see
how Ukraine could join the bloc. “The
European Union's diplomacy is a catastrophe,” Le Pen told RT's Sophie
Shevardnadze in an exclusive interview in June.
“The
EU speaks out on foreign affairs either to create problems, or to make them
worse.”
“Ukraine’s
entry into the European Union; no need to tell fairy tales: Ukraine absolutely
does not have the economic level to join the EU,” Le Pen told RT.
In
her fresh interview with Le Monde, the National Front leader had a positive
attitude towards Russian President Vladimir Putin and the economic model he builds.
And, here is the
most important observation by Le Pen:
“I have a certain
admiration for the man [Putin]. He proposes a patriotic economic model,
radically different than what the Americans are imposing on us,” said Marine Le
Pen…
So what’s Hollande
doing to address these problems created by the EU austerity measures imposed
upon France? Fox News:
Excerpt:
PARIS – President Francois Hollande is
weighing his options after dissolving the government on Monday over open
feuding in the Cabinet about how much cutting -- or spending -- will revive the
country's stagnant economy.
Hollande is to announce a new government
on Tuesday. The debate among French Socialists mirrors one taking place across
Europe on whether to pursue a German-led model of fiscal austerity or use more
government spending to spur growth.
Hollande
has promised cuts to taxes and spending as well as reforms to make it easier
for businesses to open and operate. The measures are meant to
reduce the tax burden for companies and also contain the government's deficit,
which is above the European Union's limit of 3 percent of GDP…
"The
entire world is urging us --even begging us -- to end these absurd austerity
policies that are plunging the Eurozone into an economic slowdown," he
said in a statement to the press.
A total of 3.5 million people in France
do not have a regular residence or have to live in inhuman condition
|
The
entire world is begging France to end the absurd austerity policies of the EU,
but Hollande is going for broke, staying with job killing tax cuts and more people
killing austerity. So are the people of
France in agreement? Reuters:
Excerpt:
Hollande please don't run again,
say 85% of French
8
out of 10 people in France do not want French President François Hollande to
run for re-election in 2017, a new poll says. The Socialist leader's popularity
this week plunged to an all-time low of 13 percent.
Well, well, well. Hollande’s approval is at 13% around the same
as the U.S. Congress, and wait until Putin’s sanctions hit the people of
France.
Excerpt:
French
farmers worry over Russian food embargo.
France exports 50,000 tonnes of fruit and vegetables to Russia each
year.
Russia’s
reprisal against Western sanctions has caused worry in France’s already
struggling agriculture sector that a ban on exports could saturate the market
at home.
Okay, so I’ll
put France in my tinderbox column, ready to explode.
So, back to the
roulette wheel for another spin, round and round we go, next stop Scotland.
SCOTLAND:
Scotland will be the demise
of the UK and subsequently the EU. The
people of Scotland are sick of the fiefdom Britain has imposed and no longer
sees any benefit to being part of the UK.
From the Guardian:
Excerpt:
Shortly after midnight, an email arrives.
From a leading light of the campaign for Scottish independence, one who six
months ago dreamed of nothing better than a decent showing for yes and an
honourable defeat. It says simply: “This just might be happening.”
The pro-union camp can smell the smoke.
It has seen the reports of midnight queues at council offices, as
never-before voters demand they be registered in time to have their say on
18 September. They can see the blue and white placards and badges proliferating
on every surface, they hear the talk of record-breaking turnout – and they fear
the energy, the momentum, is for yes…
“The Conservatives have fucked this
up from beginning to end,” he told me. You
can’t sell to Scots a Scotland forced to live under cuts and privatisation,
slashing the top rate of income tax and imposing the bedroom tax, he said.
You can’t do all that and then turn to the referendum as if it were a separate,
purely constitutional matter. Put another way, none of this would be happening
if there were a Labour government in Westminster.
Aww, come on Scotland the
UK needs your riches to continue their war based economy. From The Telegraph:
Excerpt:
Breakaway
Scotland could put UK defence jobs under threat
BRITISH defence jobs could be under
threat if Scotland votes to become independent, the head of one of the largest suppliers to the UK
military has warned.
Jean-Bernard Levy, chief executive of
French defence group Thales which employs 7,500 people in Britain, said the
company could reassess its commitment to the UK if Scotland breaks away
following a “Yes” vote in the referendum on September 18.
“It is very difficult to make any sort of
predictions, (but) it is clear that if it is cut off from Scotland, the rest of
Great Britain will have fewer resources to devote to defence and this will
inevitably lead us to re-examine our industrial framework,” he told Reuters.
Yes, that what Scotland’s
“Yes” vote means, they are no longer willing to give up butter for guns. This is all about the Benjamin’s. Scotland has been the host and Britain the
parasite. This isn’t about what is good
for the Scottish people, this vote is whether to fund Britain’s imperialist EU
ambitions at the expense of the people.
From The Guardian:
Excerpt:
One of the biggest targets for Scotland's
independence campaign sits behind a high, intimidating wall of reinforced
security fencing and curling banks of razor wire in the southern Highlands:
Faslane naval base, home to Britain's nuclear missile fleet.
Stretched along the shoreline of a
secluded sea loch underneath the gnarled mountains of Argyll, Faslane has been
a focus for often large protests for decades. Tens of thousands of peace
campaigners have laid siege to its gates, hacked at its fence and blocked
nearby roads in protest; some have sneaked in by sea, once clambering inside a
Trident submarine…
And just as David Cameron prepares to
welcome NATO leaders such as Barack Obama to the defence alliance's summit at
Celtic Manor in Wales on Thursday, the independence campaign landed a
significant coup.
Dame
Mariot Leslie, the UK's most recent ambassador to Nato, disclosed she planned
to vote yes. A former
director general of defence and intelligence at the Foreign Office, Leslie
wrote to the Scotsman newspaper to say she was "in no doubt" that Nato's
28 members would welcome an independent Scotland.
Ha,
ha, ha. Oh stop, my sides hurt, the UK’s
NATO Ambassador is voting “yes” to Scotland shedding the financial yoke that is
the UK under Britain. Now, that’s rich. And while we’re talking about Scotland’s
possible breakaway from Britain let’s talk about who bailed out the Royal Bank
of Scotland in 2008?
I’ll give you a hint, a
crooked, unaccountable central bank that prints up greenbacks at no expense to
the private bank, and unloads the trillions in debt on the American
People. If you guessed the Federal
Reserve Bank, you get a cigar. From
Huffington Post:
Excerpt:
Over and over again we hear from
anti-independence campaigners (especially failed former Chancellor Alastair
Darling) that an independent Scotland could not have afforded to bail out the
Scottish banks. After all, Alastair knows best! He was in charge when they
collapsed!
His argument relies on the assertion that
banks are bailed out by the taxpayers of the country in which the institution
is headquartered. This simply isn't true…
Yeah,
you’ve got that right.
At the time of the crash, the media
constantly told us that Barclays didn't need a taxpayer bailout at all. But in
fact, Barclays Bank - yes, that English based bank - received the single
biggest bailout package of any UK bank. It was just that most of it didn't come
from the UK taxpayer. Instead, Barclays was bailed out to the tune of £552.32bn
(at backdated exchange rates) by the US Federal Reserve and £6bn by the Qatari
Government.
Why did the US Federal Reserve come to
Barclays' rescue if it was not an American bank and so, on the face of it not
its responsibility?
The credit crisis provides us with clear
evidence that banks are not primarily bailed out by the government of the
country hosting their brass plaque.
Hey
America, is that what you voted for? Did
you vote to bail out banks around the world that bought Wall Street’s worthless
mortgage backed securities? That debt
was unloaded on the U.S. taxpayers without their knowledge or consent. Thanks Barack Obama, Joe Biden and Tim
Geithner.
You know this is so much fun, I could do this all day, but my post is getting rather lengthy, so I’ll wrap things up.
December
12, 2000 deserves a place in infamy, equal to Pearl Harbor, D-Day and the attacks
on the World Trade Center September 11, 2001.
December 12th, five corrupt members the United States Supreme
Court overturned hundreds of millions of votes and installed George W. Bush as
President. They did so, with the
complicity of the United States Senate.
Today five members of the Supreme Court are millionaires as are most of the
U.S. Senate.
Without
the Supreme Court coup, the 9-11 attacks more than likely would been thwarted and
there never would have been Bush’s trillions in tax cuts for rich, no Afghanistan
War, no Iraq War. Had Al Gore been
President, we would still have our homes, which would probably be energy
efficient, we’d still have our pensions, jobs and enjoy the American way of
life.
Instead,
we have a lunatic cabal that has destroyed the World. The EU may be dead, NATO may be dead, but in
America, we wish we were dead. That’s
the new world order.
Ding
dong, the EU NATO Witch is dead, and all it took was the invasion of Ukraine.
By
Patricia Baeten
No comments:
Post a Comment